Sunday, May 19, 2024

IN FURTHER DEFENSE OF PROPOSAL TO DENY TRUMP

One of you has scoffed at our proposal that President Biden declares Trump's ineligibility to be sworn in as President because he incited an insurrection against the United States and its Constitution.

The executive branch enforces Constitutional provisions all day long. Congress is not required to pass legislation permitting or directing the executive branch to do its Constitutional duty. 

The Supreme Court, fearful of the repercussions of Colorado excluding candidate Trump, held that Congress had to grant that authority. That is the holding of the case. Where did that come from? Not law, not stare decisis, but fear.

The Supreme Court agreed that Trump incited an insurrection against the United States and its Constitution. The facts have been adjudicated. What should we do about it?

Vote. But if Biden wins the popular vote and Trump the electoral vote, who will be President? Trump, for the outdated notion that the popular vote should not be trusted. But he has been adjudicated an insurrection inciter. What of the Constitution's provision that he cannot be President?

The executive branch enforces the law. President Biden can legally declare Trump ineligible and prevent him from assuming office.

With what repercussions? MAGA violence. This is a challenge to proper planning but no worse than the violence Trump will incite if he also loses the electoral vote. Legal challenges. When the Supreme Court, again, out of fear, eschews sound legal reasoning and holds Biden acted illegally (your guess of how tormented that reasoning will be), Biden can ignore the ruling. Yes, just ignore it.

The political fallout is irrelevant. The question is Country or party, democracy or dictatorship. The Trump, MAGA, and Heritage Foundation conspiracy has projected its punch. The majority wants to keep the Constitution even as it tires fitfully to apply it to modern times. We Americans are on an upward trajectory, and we will not fall back. We will continue to make America even greater.



Thursday, May 9, 2024

THE COMPLETE COLLAPSE OF MORALITY IN AMERICA

 

The Complete Collapse of Morality in America: A Blunt Indictment

In the heart of the land of the free and the home of the brave, we face an insidious crisis that threatens to dismantle the very fabric of our society: the collapse of morality. This decay isn't limited to one sector; it pervades every corner of American life, from our political institutions to our places of worship, even, and especially, the majority of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Leadership in America has failed us. Our political leaders, once seen as custodians of public virtue, have become synonymous with corruption and self-interest. Scandals and misconduct are commonplace, eroding public trust and setting a dangerous precedent. Instead of serving the people, these leaders often pursue their own agendas, forsaking the common good for personal gain.

Corporate leaders fare no better. The relentless pursuit of profit at the expense of ethical considerations has led to widespread exploitation and inequality. Companies, once expected to balance profit with social responsibility, now prioritize shareholder returns over everything else. This corporate greed deepens economic divides and reinforces the notion that success is measured solely by material wealth.

Yet, the most egregious failure lies with our religious leaders. Traditionally viewed as society's moral compass, many have succumbed to the temptations they preach against. Evangelical leaders, in particular, have become emblematic of this moral bankruptcy. Their unabashed materialism and the prosperity gospel they espouse have distorted the core teachings of their faith. Instead of guiding their flocks toward humility and compassion, they promote a message that equates faith with financial success, fostering a culture of greed and excess.

Religion meant to be a refuge of morality and humanity, has perversely become a promoter of hedonism and anti-humanism. The sanctity of spiritual guidance has been compromised, and in its place, a rush to self-indulgence and moral relativism has taken root. The institutions that should uplift our spirits and ground our ethics now contribute to our moral decline.

In this era of "I want mine, and I want yours," we have sacrificed our moral code on the altar of self-interest. No institution has escaped this scourge of amorality. Our leaders across all sectors have abandoned their responsibilities, leading us down a path of moral decay. This is a stark reminder that society cannot hope to thrive without a shared ethical foundation.

The road to redemption will be arduous. It requires a collective awakening and a recommitment to the values that once defined our nation. We must hold our leaders accountable, demand integrity, and rebuild our institutions on the principles of the golden rule and equal justice for all.

A postscript on the Supreme Court: Once our most esteemed and incorruptible compass for the ship of state, now in its majority, it represents the most significant degradation of our virtues and secularly evolved advanced sense of human ethics and moral conduct. The greatest perversion of right is the dishonor of using tenure to justify amorality. Five offenders of the public trust should be impeached and imprisoned.

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

IN SEARCH OF CHARACTER TRAITS

 Rediscovering Character: The Quest for Integrity, Courage, and Truthfulness

In an era where headlines are dominated by scandals, trust seems fleeting, and integrity often takes a backseat to expedience, the concept of character has become a lamented relic of the past. Once revered and celebrated, qualities like honesty, truthfulness, integrity, and courage now seem like rare gems in a world increasingly defined by cynicism and self-interest.

Character traits are the foundational elements of human virtue, the moral compass that guides our actions and shapes our identities. They are the bedrock upon which civilizations are built, the glue that holds societies together, and the beacon that inspires future generations. Yet, in our modern landscape, they have been relegated to the periphery of our collective consciousness.

Gone are the days when we spoke of individuals in terms of their character with admiration and respect. The notion of an "elder statesman" or a "pillar of the community" seems like a quaint relic of a bygone era. Instead, we find ourselves confronted with a culture that often rewards cunning over integrity, where the loudest voice drowns out the voice of reason and where self-promotion eclipses selflessness.

But amidst this apparent dearth of character, there remains a flicker of hope—a recognition that the absence of these virtues is not inevitable and that their revival is not beyond reach. Indeed, the fact that we mourn their loss speaks to their enduring value and deep-seated yearning for their return.

So, what are these elusive qualities that we so sorely miss?

First and foremost is honesty. In a world plagued by misinformation and deceit, honesty is a beacon of clarity and trustworthiness. It is the foundation of all meaningful relationships, the cornerstone of a just society, and the hallmark of authentic leadership.

Linked closely with honesty is integrity—the unwavering adherence to moral and ethical principles, even in the face of adversity. Integrity gives substance to our words, credibility to our actions, and authenticity to our character.

Then there is courage—the willingness to stand up for what is right, even when it is unpopular or dangerous. Courage is the fuel that drives progress, the antidote to complacency, and the catalyst for change.

And let us not forget humility—a trait often overlooked but essential in tempering the ego and fostering genuine connection. Humility is the antidote to arrogance, the bridge to empathy, and the cornerstone of true wisdom.

So, how do we rediscover and cultivate these virtues in a world seemingly overrun by their absence?

It begins with a collective reaffirmation of their importance—a recommitment to values that transcend individual gain and societal trends. We must consciously strive to embody these traits, leading by example and inspiring others to do the same.

Education also plays a crucial role in imparting knowledge, instilling values, and nurturing character. Schools, families, and communities must work together to cultivate environments that promote honesty, integrity, and empathy, fostering a new generation of leaders guided by principle rather than expediency.

Moreover, we must hold ourselves and others accountable for our actions, refusing to turn a blind eye to dishonesty, corruption, or injustice. We must demand transparency, integrity, and accountability from our leaders, recognizing that authentic leadership is not measured by power or prestige but by character and service.

Character revival requires a collective effort—recognizing that our cherished values are not relics of the past but timeless principles that transcend cultural, political, and social divides. It is a journey of self-discovery and collective renewal—a quest to reclaim our humanity and rebuild a world guided by honesty, integrity, and courage.

In the end, the true, accurate measure of a society is not its wealth, power, or prestige but the character of its people. We hope to build a future worthy of our highest aspirations by reclaiming and nurturing the virtues of honesty, integrity, and courage.

Top of Form

 

Monday, April 29, 2024

THE PRESIDENT IS A PUBLIC SERVANT (LIMITS ON IMMUNITY)

 Understanding the Boundaries of Presidential Immunity: Serving the Public Interest

In the realm of governance, presidential immunity is both a shield and a sword, wielded to protect the highest office in the land from undue scrutiny and legal entanglements. However, this immunity is not without its limits. While it safeguards the integrity of the presidency, it is firmly tethered to the actions undertaken within the scope of the president's duties and for the exclusive benefit of the public, not the individual occupying the office.

At the heart of the matter lies the principle that no one, not even the president, is above the law. This notion is enshrined in the legal framework of many democracies worldwide, including the United States. Yet, the interpretation and application of presidential immunity have often sparked debates and legal battles, mainly when allegations of misconduct or wrongdoing arise.

Presidential immunity finds its roots in the need to shield the head of state from frivolous lawsuits and distractions that could impede their ability to govern effectively. It ensures that the president can carry out their duties without constant fear of legal repercussions for every decision made or action taken. However, this immunity is not a carte blanche for unchecked authority but a carefully balanced protection designed to serve the greater good.

One crucial aspect of presidential immunity is its limitation to actions undertaken within the scope of the president's official duties. This means that while in office, the president enjoys protection from legal liability for acts performed in their official capacity. For instance, decisions related to foreign policy, national security, and executive orders fall squarely within this domain. However, actions taken for personal gain or outside the purview of presidential authority are not shielded by this immunity.

Furthermore, presidential immunity is contingent upon actions that benefit the public exclusively. In other words, any act shielded by this immunity must serve the nation's interests as a whole rather than the president's personal interests. This distinction is crucial in ensuring that the privilege of immunity is not abused for self-serving purposes but remains a tool for advancing the common good.

The rationale behind this limitation is clear: the presidency is an institution entrusted with immense power and responsibility, and its actions must be guided by the principles of transparency, accountability, and the public interest. Granting immunity solely for actions that serve these ideals upholds the integrity of the office and reinforces the bond of trust between the government and the governed.

Moreover, presidential immunity is not static but subject to interpretation and evolution. Over the years, courts have grappled with defining boundaries and weighing their implications in changing societal norms and legal precedents. For instance, the landmark Supreme Court case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald in 1982 established the doctrine of absolute immunity for the president from civil lawsuits for official acts. However, subsequent rulings and legal challenges have refined and sometimes constrained this doctrine, underscoring the dynamic nature of presidential immunity in the legal landscape.

In conclusion, presidential immunity serves as a vital safeguard for the effective functioning of the executive branch, shielding the president from legal distractions that could hinder their ability to govern. However, this immunity has its limitations. It is limited to actions undertaken within the scope of the president's duties and exclusively benefiting the public interest. By upholding these principles, presidential immunity strikes a delicate balance between protecting the presidency and ensuring accountability to the people it serves.

Top of Form

 

Sunday, April 28, 2024

WARNING: FROM HERITAGE FOUNDATION TO OLIGARCHY/THEOCRACY

Look up its propaganda: https://www.heritage.org/about-heritage/mission. Yes, read and consider what it actually is doing. It supported Trump and handpicked the Supreme Court majority to name but a portion of America it has in its scorpion claws. Here is the stinger. They plan to take over ultimate power through DJT, dismantle the government, and install a permanent oligarchy/theocracy. Read their propaganda and the 2025 plan. Kiss the Constitution and civil rights goodbye.

This is not a conspiracy theory. Today's best evidence is the errant SC that tossed the stare decisis rule of law and overturned Roe. Now, it is signaling the postponement of all actions against DJT, except the NY trial, which is in progress until they go away. Again, it ignores precedent and the rule of law on executive immunity. Its precedent in Winstar will be sidestepped if and when it rules on DJT's immunity.

The Heritage Foundation is a shadow fascist political party supporting means to its end. The end is to replace individual rights with total government control to benefit the rich and the Christian religion. "From empowering parents in education, reversing growing spending and inflation, and protecting the unborn, to securing America’s borders, countering the threat of Communist China, holding Big Tech accountable, and ensuring free and fair elections—Heritage is on the front lines in the fight to help Americans thrive."

The Heritage Foundation hand picked Supreme Court Justices so that the court could kill the rule of law by eliminating stare decisis, the basic principle that prior precedents must be followed. We now have official anarchy as sanctioned by the highest court. 

Clever, intelligent, well-financed, and well-connected, this juggernaut is silently rolling all over the sleeping majority on its way to total dominance. The Supreme Court majority are shills and sycophants for installing the hand-picked operatives. Again, just look at how it eviscerates the rule of law.

We who swear to defend the Constitution are duty-bound to fight against the Heritage Foundation and its henchmen on the bench. We must speak out and vote with Joe Biden to remain the land of the free and the home of the brave.