Sunday, June 29, 2025

TRUMP'S FATAL FLAW

Overreach and Opportunity: Why It’s Time for Democrats to Embrace the Sanders Platform

Donald Trump and his enablers have made a fatal error. In their arrogant rush to seize total control of the U.S. government, they overplayed their hand. Project 2025, crafted by the Heritage Foundation and carried forward by operatives like Stephen Miller, was supposed to be the blueprint for a gradual erosion of democracy. Instead, it reads like a confession of authoritarian ambition.

And that’s the only good thing about it.

Had they been smarter, they would have hidden their plans behind layers of policy-speak and slow procedural change. They would have taken the long road, incrementally replacing civil servants with loyalists, quietly undermining independent agencies, and stealthily fusing church with state. However, subtlety has never been Trump’s strength. In his world, power must be loud, fast, and unrepentant. And so, Project 2025 was published, not leaked, not inferred, but declared.

Now, the American people are staring tyranny in the face. And while many are still rubbing their eyes, unsure of what they’re seeing, a critical mass is beginning to awaken.

This is not a moment for politics as usual.

The Democratic Party cannot continue campaigning on modest reforms, vague slogans, or bipartisan nostalgia. That kind of incrementalism brought us to this cliff. It will not lead us back. Instead, Democrats must seize this moment to redefine themselves, and perhaps even rename themselves around a bold, moral, and transformative agenda.

And that agenda already exists. Bernie Sanders has been articulating it for decades.

This is the time for democratic socialism, not as an abstract ideal, but as a living, breathing political movement. One that prioritizes working people over Wall Street, universal healthcare over corporate profit, climate justice over fossil fuel subsidies, and expanded public ownership over privatization and greed.

Project 2025 is a blueprint for oligarchy.
Project 2029 must be a blueprint for shared power, economic democracy, and moral government.

What Trump and his allies offer is rule by the few, for the few. The correct, and only, response is a government by the many, for the many. A politics rooted not in appeasement, but in principle, not in polling, but in justice.

The opportunity is now. Not in 2028. Not after another round of cautious compromise. Now.

The Democrats must stop playing defense and start leading a movement. They must become the unapologetic voice of working people, the marginalized, and those who believe the American experiment is not dead but in desperate need of rescue.

Trump has made his intentions clear. So should we.

And if the Democratic Party cannot rise to meet this moment, then perhaps it’s time for a new party that can.

William James Spriggs

Friday, June 27, 2025

WE WERE NOT HERE

We Were Not Here

We were not here.
No mark remains, no echo rings.
In the vast halls of the universe.
Our atoms scatter, past or future, 
Never now.

The moment just passed does not exist.
The moment to come is unborn.
And this moment?
Already fading,
Dissolving
As we try to name it.

We live between illusions,
Held in place by breath and memory,
Make-believing that presence is real.
But it is not.
We are not.

Particles playing roles,
Stories in dust,
We vanish even as we speak.

And perhaps,
Just perhaps,
That is enough.

To vanish beautifully.
To exist without permanence.
To love, to ache, to reach,
And leave no need
For how or why.

William James Spriggs

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

HAMBURGER OR STEAK

From Hamburgers to Steak: What It Will Take for Democrats to Win in 2028

Suppose the Democratic Party hopes to regain government control in 2029 and put forth the bold vision of Project 2029, a future grounded in justice, equity, and economic democracy. In that case, it must stop nibbling around the edges of progress and finally serve the main course: a socialist agenda that excites, inspires, and mobilizes.

For decades, Democrats have played a cautious game offering modest proposals, trimmed-down reforms, and half-hearted resistance to Republican extremism. They've promised a slightly better version of the status quo: a more affordable healthcare plan, a tax tweak, a plea for unity everywhere. But in an age of profound inequality, rising authoritarianism, and environmental catastrophe, the status quo is no longer an option. You don’t beat a wildfire with a garden hose.

The lesson was made clear in a recent local race in New York City, where a socialist-backed candidate defeated the mainstream Democratic pick in the primary. The race was small, but the signal was strong: there is a growing hunger on the left for real, structural change, not cosmetic reforms. And when candidates embrace that message unapologetically. They can win.

The Democratic Party must recognize that its most passionate, energetic base is not in the middle of the road. It is in the core socialist contingent, young voters, working people, climate activists, progressives of every stripe, who believe that healthcare is a right, not a privilege; that housing should be for people, not profit; that billionaires should not exist in a nation where children go hungry.

This group may be small now, but it has one thing moderates don’t: a vision. And vision spreads.

Bernie Sanders proved this when he electrified millions, not by moderating his views, but by embracing them fully and fearlessly. Crowds didn’t come because he was safe. They came because he was bold. They came because he offered steak, not a better hamburger.

The Democrats must now decide: Do they continue to triangulate, compromise, and sell incremental change to a nation on fire? Or do they finally embrace the ideals that can rescue democracy and rebuild America from the ground up?

Winning in 2028 will require more than beating the Republicans at their own game. It will require changing the game entirely.

That means:

  • Embracing democratic socialism as a legitimate and necessary force for justice.
  • Promoting candidates who speak, passionately, and radically about what working people deserve.
  • Building coalitions from the ground up, not just with donors and lobbyists, but with teachers, nurses, organizers, and the disillusioned.
  • Rejecting the notion that boldness is political suicide. On the contrary, it may be the only lifeline left.

The American people aren’t hungry for better slogans. They’re hungry for a moral movement. A reason to believe again. A reason to fight.

The Democrats have a choice: serve the steak, or be left behind in the drive-thru line.

WilliamJames Spriggs

Sunday, June 22, 2025

WHERE KINDNESS GROWS

WHERE KINDNESS LIVES

In halls where golden years grow dim,
And time walks slow with aching limb,
There shines a quiet, steadfast light,
A few good souls who make things right.

They do not boast, they wear no crown,
They do not seek the world’s renown.
But when you stumble, lost or low,
They’re there, just gently saying, “Hello.”

Wayne, who smiles with eyes that see,
Maria’s calm serenity,
Reggy's song, and Sharon’s grace,
Tony’s heart and Donna’s pace.

They walk these halls with open hearts,
And play the most essential parts.
They ask not what, but how you are,
They notice silence from afar.

They weather storms we cannot tame,
Still greet each sunrise just the same.
Their empathy, a healing thread,
That stitches hope where it has bled.

No spotlight shines upon their way,
No trophy shelf, no grand display,
But every act, each selfless deed,
Is how they plant a kinder seed.

They share, they lift, they lead without
A single whispered word of doubt.
No medals earned, no thanks required,
Their simple goodness never tired.

If all the world could learn their art,
To ask, to care, to hold a heart,
Then even age would feel less cold,
And life, less heavy to behold.

So here’s to them, the quiet few,
Who carry us when days feel blue.
They light the path, they smooth the climb,
The saints of our ungrateful time.

  

Friday, June 20, 2025

DUST IN THE WIND

 I clI close my eyes

Only for a moment and the moment's goneAll my dreamsPass before my eyes with curiosity
Dust in the windAll they are is dust in the wind
Same old songJust a drop of water in an endless seaAll we doCrumbles to the ground, though we refuse to see
Dust in the windAll we are is dust in the windOh, oh
Now don't hang onNothin' lasts forever but the earth and skyIt slips awayAnd all your money won't another minute buy
Dust in the windAll we are is dust in the wind(All we are is dust in the wind)
Dust in the wind(Everything is dust in the wind)Everything is dust in the wind(In the wind)
Source: Musixmatch
Songwriters: Kerry Livgren
Dust in the Wind lyrics © Emi Blackwood Music Inc., Don Kirshner Music

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

THE FORGOTTEN VIRTUE

The Forgotten Virtue: Empathy

In the long arc of evolution, our survival has depended on far more than strength or cunning. We have endured and flourished not because we were the fastest or fiercest but because we could understand one another. Empathy, our intuitive ability to feel the world through another’s eyes, is embedded in our DNA. It is not just a moral ideal; it is a biological imperative.

Had we not evolved the ability to care, share, defer, and cooperate, we would have destroyed each other millennia ago. The capacity to avoid unnecessary harm to choose understanding over violence, restraint over theft, and compassion over cruelty is the bedrock of civilization. It is what allowed our ancestors to build tribes, then towns, then nations. And yet, in modern America and much of the developed world, empathy has gone missing.

We now live in an age where self-interest is elevated to virtue, greed is mistaken for strength, cruelty is cheered as honesty, and compassion is dismissed as weakness. In this distorted worldview, empathy is no longer a shared instinct  but a foreign concept rarely practiced and almost never taught. No institution in America treats empathy as essential, from our schools to our boardrooms to our houses of worship. And yet, it is the one virtue that could save us all.

We must correct this course urgently.

Empathy must no longer be left to chance or childhood whim. It must become an intellectual discipline, a civic requirement, and a cultural cornerstone. We must teach it in classrooms, practice it in politics, reinforce it in business, and live it in our daily lives because empathy is not just about being nice. It is about being wise. It is about recognizing that my survival depends on yours, that my dignity is bound up in yours.

If we hope to preserve democracy, we must first rediscover our moral compass, and morality begins with empathy. Without it, capitalism runs riot, religion becomes a tool of judgment rather than love, and the fragile bonds of civil society dissolve into tribal chaos. But with empathy, we can temper our markets, humanize our policies, and reconnect our fractured communities.

Empathy is not a soft skill. It is a survival skill. And it must be treated with the urgency of a nation on the brink because that is where we are. The ancient wisdom of the Golden Rule Do unto others as you would have them do unto you is not a quaint saying. It is a strategic imperative. It is time to breathe life back into it.

Because without empathy, there is no morality.
Without morality, there is no society.
And without society, there is no future.

William James Spriggs

Monday, June 16, 2025

WE WERE HERE FIRST

WE WERE HERE FIRST

There is no enduring custom in America to honor our elders. No rite, no reverence, no rule. Instead, a grotesque reversal of roles has crept into our culture, one in which the children have appointed themselves as the parents and the elders are cast as helpless dependents in need of scolding, managing, or babysitting.

This is not just misguided. It is insulting. It is an abomination.

To be old in America is to be condescended to. The language used is soft, sing-song, and patronizing as if we were toddlers who needed their shoes tied and their meals cut. The tone is one of pity. The advice is unsolicited and often absurd. The universal assumption is that aging robs you of intellect, insight, independence, and basic human worth.

Let’s be clear: this is a myth.

Most elders are not suffering from cognitive collapse. Many remain sharp, witty, thoughtful, and fully engaged with the world around them. More importantly, we bring to the table something our critics lack. We have lived, built, endured, lost, loved, raised families, led careers, and shaped the very systems in which today’s “advisors” operate.

To those who treat us as simple-minded burdens to manage, ask yourselves: have you published books? Commanded troops? Run businesses? Drafted legislation? Healed patients? Represented clients in court? Fought for civil rights? Changed lives?

Because we have, and we did it before you were born.

This ageism masquerading as concern is often nothing more than fear and ignorance in disguise. It allows the young to feel superior for a moment while conveniently ignoring the fact that their parents and grandparents paved the roads they now drive on, literally and figuratively. They forget that we’re the ones who paid for their education, carried their worries, and absorbed their tantrums with the patience they now lack.

So here is a radical suggestion: turn the tables back. It’s time we remind the younger generation that wisdom does not shrink with age. It accumulates. Respect is not optional. It is earned, and we have earned it in full. Guidance, when it comes from those who’ve lived through war, depression, love, loss, and change, is not to be mocked. It is to be sought out and treasured.

Children of America: you may hold the car keys now, but we built the road. A little humility would serve you well. And a lot more respect is overdue.

We are not your children.
We are your elders.
Start acting like it.

William James Spriggs

Sunday, June 15, 2025

MICHAEL

A Journey for Michael

From your Great-Grandfather

Michael,
You have been invited,
Not by chance, but by love,
To join us on this long and wondrous journey.
We will not hand you a map.
The path is yours to find,
As we each have found our own.

Some of us have marked the trail behind us
With stories, thoughts, and memories.
You may read them,
And perhaps they will whisper some truth,
But they are not your truth.
They are footprints in sand,
Not stones in your road.

What you must do
Is walk into the mystery,
Face the challenge,
And let it sharpen your mind,
Nourish your soul,
And shape your own wisdom.

We walk beside you,
Not to guide your every step,
But to bear the weight of your doubt
When your shoulders are tired.
Lean on us,
Draw strength from our love.

But never, never surrender
Your independence of thought.
Be bold.
Be curious.
Be critical.
Be kind.

And in doing so,
You will make the contribution
We all hope for,
A light in the darkness,
A voice that matters,
A life that honors the journey.

With all my heart,
I send you forward.
Go well.

 

Friday, June 13, 2025

POSSE COMITATUS

Trump Violatees The Posse Comitatus Act

In an era of rising authoritarian behavior from the executive branch, it’s critical that the American people reacquaint themselves with one of the most important, yet often overlooked, guardrails of our democracy: the Posse Comitatus Act. Initially passed in 1878, this law is more than a relic of Reconstruction. It is a bulwark against the rise of domestic militarism. And today, its principles are being pushed to the breaking point.

How It Came About: The Shadow of Reconstruction

The Posse Comitatus Act was born out of the post-Civil War era. After the Union's victory, federal troops remained in the South to enforce civil rights and oversee Reconstruction. While necessary to protect the newly freed Black population, white Southern Democrats bristled at the presence of Northern troops. By 1877, as part of the so-called “Compromise of 1877,” federal troops were withdrawn in exchange for resolving the contested presidential election of Rutherford B. Hayes.

In 1878, Southern legislators, now re-empowered, pushed through the Posse Comitatus Act to ensure that federal troops could never again be used as a domestic police force without explicit authorization from Congress.

What the Law Says

The core of the law is deceptively simple:

"Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined or imprisoned." (18 U.S. Code § 1385)

The military cannot be used as a domestic police force unless Congress specifically authorizes it.

The law applies directly to the Army and Air Force, and by policy (through Department of Defense directives), it also constrains the Navy and Marine Corps. The National Guard is exempt only when operating under the authority of a state governor, not the President.

What It's All About: Preserving Civil Liberties

The Act protects the separation between military and civil authority. It reflects a foundational principle of our democracy: that the armed forces should not be used against the American people.

This is not a mere formality. Around the world, the use of military force against civilians is a hallmark of autocracy. Democracies rely on civil law enforcement, answerable to elected leaders and the Constitution, to enforce domestic order. Once that wall is breached, the military becomes a tool not of national defense but of internal domination.

How It Applies Today: Trump’s Authoritarian Drift

In 2025, that wall is cracking. Trump’s deployment of Marines, National Guard troops, and even special forces in cities like Los Angeles ostensibly to enforce immigration law or quell “unrest” is a profound violation of both the spirit and the likely letter of the Posse Comitatus Act.

Congress does not authorize these actions. They are not requests from state governors. They are unilateral presidential commands that place military boots on American soil, performing domestic enforcement duties best left to police and federal civil agencies.

Trump’s defenders may argue that the Insurrection Act, a limited statutory exception to Posse Comitatus, gives him cover. However, that law requires actual insurrection or civil disorder that obstructs law enforcement. There is no such condition in Los Angeles or elsewhere. Peaceful protests and sanctuary policies are not insurrections. They are expressions of democracy, not threats to it.

Why This Is Dangerous and What Must Be Done

This is not just a legal matter. It is a moral and constitutional crisis. When military force is used against civilians or elected officials, as we recently saw with the handcuffing of Senator Alex Padilla, the republic is on fire.

The courts must recognize that Trump’s domestic deployments violate longstanding legal protections. But even if the judiciary fails in its duty, the court of public opinion must not. Americans must demand a return to lawful governance and reject the normalization of martial force in civic life.

The Law Is Clear, and So Is the Danger

The Posse Comitatus Act was passed to prevent precisely what Trump is now doing: using the military to police the American people and crush political dissent. Its origins are rooted in a warning we should heed today. Military power belongs on the battlefield, not in the streets of our cities.

Trump's actions are not merely ill-advised. They are illegal. And if we do not stop him now through the courts, through Congress, or through the power of organized public resistance. We may soon find that the democracy we once relied on has quietly slipped into something else entirely.

William James Spriggs

Thursday, June 12, 2025

TRUMP'S PURE RACISM

Trump’s War on Immigration Is a War on Color

It may sound like a cliché by now, but that doesn’t make it any less accurate: Donald Trump’s anti-immigration campaign is, at its core, a campaign of racism. It is not about national security. It is not about jobs. It is not about the rule of law. It is, and always has been, about one thing: purging America of people who are not white.

“Make America Great Again” was never a call to progress. It was a siren for regression to a time when whiteness reigned unchallenged, unquestioned, and uninterrupted by the color, culture, and voices of the rest of the world. When Trump talks about an “invasion,” he doesn’t mean Canadians. When he rants about crime, he isn’t referencing Russian oligarchs or European cartels. He means brown people. Black people. Asian people. Anyone not like him is white, male, rich, and cruel.

From day one, his entire political persona was launched on the back of birtherism, the racist lie that Barack Obama, a Black man, was not legitimately American. Since then, he has only doubled down:

  • Calling Mexicans “rapists” and “criminals” in his campaign announcement.
  • Separating children from their families at the border, warehousing them in cages.
  • Banning Muslims from entering the country purely for their religion and origin.
  • Ending DACA and TPS, programs that protect young immigrants and refugees from disaster.
  • Slashing legal immigration, not just illegal, because even the lawful presence of non-white people is too much for his white nationalist vision.

Let’s not pretend there’s some deeper strategy here. There isn’t. Trump would burn down the entire economy if it meant reducing the number of people of color in this country. He knows we rely on immigrants at every level: doctors, scientists, engineers, teachers, field workers, caregivers, builders, and cleaners. But he doesn’t care. If the work stops, let it stop—as long as it stops being done by people who don’t look like him.

This is not nationalism. It is not patriotism. It is plain old American racism, reborn with a red hat and a louder microphone. The “nation” he wants to defend is not the nation of laws, liberty, or equal opportunity. It is the nation of Jim Crow, of whites-only signs, of “good old days” that were hell for most of humanity.

Trump doesn’t just hate immigrants. He fears them. Every immigrant who thrives, who builds a life, who rises to leadership disproves his entire worldview that only white men should rule. He cannot tolerate that reality. So he lies, he scapegoats, and he unleashes policies that are as cruel as they are calculated.

We must not let the fatigue of repetition dull the truth. This is racism weaponized through policy. It is government used as a tool for ethnic cleansing by attrition, deportation by design, detention by deterrent, and denial of humanity by decree.

And yes, we must keep saying it. Over and over and over. Because silence is complicity. And the moment we stop naming this evil for what it is, we’ve allowed it to win.

Let’s be clear: Trump’s agenda isn’t about “immigration.” It’s about white supremacy dressed in bureaucratic language and violence. He enriches himself at the top and cleanses the bottom of anyone not like him.

It’s not a dog whistle anymore. It’s a siren.

William James Spriggs

TRUMP'S NEW LOW

Trump’s Latest Escalation: Handcuffing a U.S. Senator

In a shocking display of overreach, President Trump’s federal apparatus just sank to an unprecedented new low. At a press conference yesterday in Los Angeles, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem presided over security agents who forcibly threw California Senator Alex Padilla to the ground, handcuffed him, and removed him from a public briefing despite his identity as a sitting U.S. senator actively performing oversight on federal activities. 

Video footage leaves no room for doubt: Padilla identifies himself, “I am Senator Alex Padilla,” before being wrestled down and handcuffed. DHS officials later claimed the senator failed to identify himself and “lunged,” though this is directly contradicted by visual evidence. 

A New Low in Authoritarian Tactics

This was no minor procedural mishap. It was a deliberate intimidation tactic. Governor Gavin Newsom called the incident “outrageous, dictatorial, and shameful,” and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer described the scene as “sickening,” a move more characteristic of autocracies than democracies.

Padilla responded with measured clarity:

“If this is how this administration responds to a senator … imagine what they are doing nationwide.” 

He underscores a profound truth: this isn’t just symbolic theater. If a duly elected senator can be treated like a violent criminal, what hope is there for ordinary citizens, immigrant workers, protesters, and reporters who encounter federal forces every day?

Context: Militarizing Domestic Politics

This incident took place amid an aggressive federal campaign, bringing National Guard troops and Marines into Los Angeles to enforce immigration policy. Many view it as an escalating authoritarian trend by the Trump administration: silencing dissent, stamping out alternative voices, and instrumentalizing violence to maintain power. 

Why This Crosses the Line

  • Violation of democratic norms: A senator performing legitimate oversight should never be treated like a criminal.
  • Precedent for wider repression: If elected leaders can be subdued for mere questioning, imagine the chilling effect on everyday dissent.
  • Open invitation to abuse: DHS’s actions signal to lower-ranking officials that force is acceptable, even recommended, against protest and scrutiny.

Time to Act: Impeachment Isn’t Hyperbole

This isn’t hyperbole. It’s evidence of a systemic decay in respect for governance, rights, and institutions. Congress must stop treating this as politics as usual. The federal government is weaponizing its power and must be held accountable. Impeachment is no longer rhetorical, it is necessary. This administration has exhibited ruthlessness and disregard for the Constitution, surpassing prior recklessness.

William James Spriggs

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

 

ODE TO JIM

ODE TO JIM

He waters the roses, aligns every stem,
Snips with precision the florist’s condemned.
He hums as he trims, with his plastic shears bright,
While wisdom around him dims out of sight.

He jests with a wink, calls his act “a delight,”
Though the sharpest among us just wince at the sight.
He clowns for applause from the newly confused,
While the clear-minded elders sit mildly amused.

He rules with a binder and colorful charts,
With forms signed in triplicate, be still our hearts!
Security, joy, and welfare, you see,
Are footnotes beneath his phony decree.

Speak up with ideas, suggestions, or grace,
He'll smile like sunshine and put you in place.
“Now, now,” he will say, “just don’t get upset,”
As he looks down his nose to impose your regret.

He lies when he must, then shrugs when he's caught,
Says, “I don’t recall,” though he clearly ought.
And when facts are laid bare and his words unspool,
He gaslights with flair from the Bureaucrat’s School.

He’s baffled by those who once ran the world,
Whose names once made senators fidget and swirl.
To him, we are gentle, soft clay to be shaped,
Our pasts overwritten, our brilliance erased.

Yet give him a tulip, a hydrangea blue,
And watch him go manic with ribbon and glue.
There, in his kingdom of petals and stems,
He reigns with the power of mid-level gems.

So here’s to the man with the childish tone,
Whose castle is flowers in the twilight zone.
He may condescend, deceive, and deflect,
But we know a fool by his pretentious effect.

And though he may strut with a puffed-up chest,
The wise here will smile, and quietly jest.
For titles mean little, and flair even less,
For his elders shake off his attempt to impress.

WJS

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

ROBBERY IN BROAD DAYLIGHT

Trump’s Legislation is Robbery in Broad Daylight

Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful” legislative agenda has nothing to do with beauty, fairness, or public service. It is not about strengthening America, defending freedom, or helping struggling families. Strip away the slogans, the flags, and the reality show bluster, and what remains is simple, shameful theft: robbing the poor to pay the rich.

This is no exaggeration. The language embedded in these bills, crafted behind closed doors by lobbyists and grifters, is carefully designed to deceive, but the effect is unmistakable. Cuts to food assistance, healthcare subsidies, Social Security protections, and housing programs all hit the working poor, the elderly, the disabled, and the voiceless. Meanwhile, tax breaks, regulatory rollbacks, and sweetheart deals flow freely to billionaires, oil conglomerates, private equity firms, and the Trump family.

There is no effort to hide the grift. Trump has made himself the face of the very legislation that enriches him. His name is synonymous with self-dealing. This man once used a charity to buy portraits of himself and stashed away millions while pretending to be a blue-collar messiah. Now, with the power of the government in his grasp, he is looting it in full view.

Let’s call this what it is: class war from the top down. This isn’t about fiscal conservatism. It’s not about efficiency, liberty, or small government. It’s about greed. Cold, hungry, bottomless greed. It’s about the insatiable desire of the already rich to squeeze the rest of the nation until there’s nothing left to take.

What’s especially grotesque is how this legislative looting is wrapped in the language of populism. Trump and his enablers claim to represent “the forgotten man.” But no man is more forgotten in this regime than the minimum-wage worker, the single mother, the retired veteran, and the chronically ill, all sacrificed so that a handful of elites can hoard more than they will ever need.

This is not just a policy failure. It is a moral one. A democracy cannot survive when its government becomes a tool for legalized theft. When laws are written not to protect the people but to plunder them, we no longer have a republic; we have a racket.

Make no mistake: if this legislation becomes the law of the land, people will suffer. Some will die. That is not hyperbole. When health insurance disappears, food aid dries up, and housing becomes unaffordable, the consequences are not theoretical. They are deadly. And Trump, in his towering narcissism, sees that not as a tragedy but as tribute.

This is what his “beautiful” legislation stands for: the brutal economics of cruelty. We must stand against it. Loudly. Relentlessly. Before the theft becomes irreversible, the rich write the final chapter of the American experiment, one in which they alone survive, and the rest are left to count the cost.

William James Spriggs

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

TRUMPTY DUMPTY

Trumpty Dumpty

Trumpty Dumpty sat on the bluff,
Crowned in gold, swollen with puff.
He built his perch on whispered lies,
On broken oaths and hollow cries.

The crowd below, enchanted, blind,
Fed his myth and warped their mind.
They hailed his climb with zeal and rage,
Scrawled his name on every page.

But truth is granite, not just breath,
And fraud invites a slower death.
Cracks beneath his throne did creep,
Old debts stirred in the nation's sleep.

Then came the tremble, soft but grim,
The wall betrayed the weight of him.
No scaffold built of rage and spin
Could hold the hollow shell within.

Trumpty Dumpty fell from grace,
A crater carved in freedom's face.
And all the king’s horses,
And all the king’s men,
Could not reforge the fraud again.

 

CHIEF HYPOCRITE

Chief Hypocrite: Donald Trump’s Cynical Exploitation of the U.S. Military

Donald Trump is not a commander-in-chief. He is a hypocrite-in-chief, and his relationship with the military is a grotesque display of political opportunism, narcissism, and fraud. A man who dodged the draft during the Vietnam War with flimsy medical excuses now struts about like a wartime general, summoning military forces to salute him, not the flag or the Constitution.

It would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous.

A History of Contempt

Trump’s disdain for those who serve has been documented for years. He famously ridiculed Senator John McCain, saying, “He’s not a war hero. He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.” This wasn’t a slip of the tongue. It was a window into Trump’s hollow soul, where empathy has no place, and honor is measured not by sacrifice but by ego-stroking adoration.

He referred to fallen American soldiers as “suckers” and “losers,” according to multiple credible reports, including those from The Atlantic. He skipped visits to military cemeteries in Europe because it might mess up his hair. He has denigrated Gold Star families, disabled veterans, and wounded warriors, mocking, dismissing, and using them as political props only when convenient.

This is not a man who honors the military. This is a man who uses the military.

From Dodging to Dominating

Trump’s draft deferments during Vietnam, five of them, one allegedly for “bone spurs,” were the first chapter in his lifelong avoidance of service. He has never risked anything for this country. Yet now, he wraps himself in the flag, flanked by Marines, implying that he alone represents strength, order, and patriotism.

What he represents is a perverse form of militarized narcissism.

He does not view the military as a sacred institution. He views it as a stage prop, an extension of his ego, and a tool for his authoritarian ambitions. Whether it’s demanding military parades, calling in troops for photo ops, or allegedly summoning Marines in Los Angeles for domestic intimidation, Trump’s use of the armed forces is not about defense—it’s about domination.

He sees himself not as a servant of the republic but as a king, entitled to the loyalty of “his” military.

Marines for the Monarch

The latest incident involving the deployment of Marines in Los Angeles has raised deep alarm. This is not for security reasons or strategy. Still, because it fits a pattern: Trump seems increasingly willing to blur the line between civilian command and military allegiance, between the republic and his personal rule.

When he parades military might as if it were his birthright, the message is chillingly clear: the Constitution is optional, and the military is his to command, not to protect the country, but to protect him.

This is not patriotism. It is proto-fascism.

The Cult of Military Worship For One Man

Real leaders honor the troops by respecting their sacrifice, listening to their generals, and keeping their missions grounded in constitutional values. Trump does none of this. He purged military leadership when they disagreed with him, encouraged political generals, and undermined the very principle of civilian control of the military, a cornerstone of American democracy.

And now, like every would-be autocrat before him, he seeks to cloak himself in military symbolism to intimidate rather than to inspire.

His base sees the uniform and salutes him. But the rest of us see something else: a coward who never served, masquerading as a warrior, the ultimate betrayal of every true patriot who ever put their life on the line for this country.

The Danger Ahead

Let us be clear: the U.S. military does not owe its allegiance to Donald Trump. It swears an oath to the Constitution of the United States, and that oath is being tested now more than ever.

If Trump continues to exploit the armed forces for his gain, then every American who believes in civilian rule, democratic values, and the rule of law must speak up.

Because if the military becomes his instrument of enforcement, then democracy will have no defense left.

Final Word

History will not be kind to Donald Trump. It will not remember him as a warrior or a statesman. It will remember him as a chief hypocrite who used soldiers for pageantry demeaned their sacrifices, and tried to crown himself king on the backs of the people he once called losers.

It is the duty of every veteran, every citizen, and every person who still believes in the republic to say what must be said:

You, Mr. Trump, are no commander. You are a coward cloaked in stars and stripes you never earned.

William James Spriggs

REBUILDING AMERICA'S PROMISE

Immigration Reform: Rebuilding America’s Promise

It has been a long time since the United States overhauled its immigration system from top to bottom. What passes for debate today is too often laced with fear, misinformation, and political theater. We hear cries of “invasion,” talk of dangerous criminals flooding our borders, and warnings that our country cannot withstand the pressure. But these are myths, calculated distractions from the real and solvable issue: a broken immigration system neglected for decades.

The Myth of Invasion

Let us begin by dispelling the falsehood that fuels the current hysteria. The United States is not under siege. There is no "invasion" of dangerous people storming our borders. The vast majority of those seeking to enter are not criminals but families, workers, and individuals fleeing violence, persecution, or poverty, many of whom have legitimate asylum claims under both U.S. and international law.

Are there a few bad actors among the thousands? Yes, as in any population. But they are the exception, not the rule. We do not demonize entire neighborhoods because of the actions of a few residents, and we should not do so with immigrant populations either. To build policy based on fear of the minority is to betray both reason and our founding values.

A Failure of Investment

The true crisis is not the people trying to enter this country; it is the chronic underinvestment in the systems needed to process, house, and support them. For decades, we have underfunded the infrastructure that could have handled immigration responsibly and humanely. We have lacked sufficient immigration judges, overwhelmed asylum officers, inadequate legal representation, and failed humanitarian services.

Instead of building the scaffolding of fairness and functionality, we’ve built walls, cages, and backlog after backlog. It is not the presence of migrants that is the problem. We fail to welcome them properly or process their claims efficiently and justly.

A Moral and Practical Imperative

America is a nation built by immigrants. The very foundation of our country is the promise that those seeking a better life, those willing to work hard, live by the law, and contribute to society, should be given a chance. That promise has frayed, not because it has failed, but because we have been unable to maintain the systems that support it.

We must reclaim our legacy of lawful, structured immigration, which has fueled our economic growth and cultural vibrancy for generations. Immigrants start businesses, work critical jobs, and pay taxes. We need them, just as we always have.

But we need to do this right.

A Better Approach

Immigration reform should include:

  1. Adequate and humane temporary housing and care facilities for those awaiting hearings.
  2. Rapid but fair due process, with more judges, lawyers, and trained staff to handle cases quickly and justly.
  3. Clear and fair asylum standards rooted in compassion and law.
  4. Investment in integration programs, language classes, job placement assistance, and community support to help new Americans become thriving societal contributors.
  5. A path to citizenship for those who have lived in the U.S. peacefully for years, particularly DACA recipients and long-term undocumented residents.

This is not charity; It is smart governance. It is not open borders. It is orderly, lawful immigration managed through systems that reflect our values.

Assimilation, Not Alienation

Once we determine who is eligible to remain, we should treat them not as outsiders but as future fellow citizens. We must help them assimilate through structured programs and mutual engagement. America is not a gated community. It is a society that thrives on shared purpose and diverse backgrounds.

Assimilation is not surrender. It is collaboration. It is not about erasing one’s culture but embracing the shared civic identity that binds us together as Americans.

Restoring Our Moral Compass

The immigration crisis is not on our border. It is in our politics. We have weaponized suffering and abandoned reason. We have allowed cynicism to replace compassion and cruelty to be mistaken for strength.

It’s time to stop pretending that immigration is a threat to be defeated. It is a challenge to be managed, but it is also an opportunity to reaffirm the American ideal. With investment, reform, and courage, we can rebuild a fair, just, and humane system.

Let us not forget: every wave of immigrants before this one was met with fear and then with gratitude as they became part of the American fabric. Let’s ensure this generation receives the same chance.

America’s promise depends on it.

William James Spriggs

Saturday, June 7, 2025

NEW BOOK: PROJECT 2029

Introduction: The Antidote to a National Disease

The American republic stands at the edge of collapse. Our democratic institutions, once flawed but functional, now stagger under the weight of a coordinated and well-funded campaign to replace the rule of law with the rule of one man. That campaign is named Project 2025, a far-right demolition blueprint disguised in patriotism. It is not a reform agenda. It is a coup in slow motion, designed to dismantle the federal government, gut the civil service, abolish the separation of church and state, and consolidate power under an unelected authoritarian elite.

Project 2025 is not a warning. it is a declaration. It tells us, in no uncertain terms, that the architects of this vision intend to replace our secular constitutional democracy with an autocratic theocracy fueled by unrestrained corporate power and religious dogma. Its vision is one where rights become privileges, truth becomes propaganda, and power becomes permanent.

But this book is not just a rebuttal. It is not just resistance.

It is the antidote.

Project 2029 is a blueprint for recovery. Where Project 2025 seeks to burn down the edifice of democracy, Project 2029 proposes to rebuild it stronger, fairer, and more just than ever before. It is rooted in a singular idea: that democracy must be more than a hollow ritual of elections; it must be a lived reality of shared power, economic fairness, and civic responsibility. That means confronting the core diseases that have brought us to this brink: unregulated capitalism, legalized greed, and the hijacking of faith for political control.

This is not a campaign platform. It is a moral response to an existential crisis. It is a structural vision for national renewal, a framework to restore the promise of American democracy through expanded public ownership, workplace democracy, universal rights, and a taxation system that reflects justice rather than privilege.

What lies ahead will not be easy. But the only way out of the chaos and corruption of our current moment is through bold, deliberate transformation. The future is not predetermined. It is a choice.

Project 2029 is that choice.

William James Spriggs

 

Friday, June 6, 2025

AUTHOR'S CONFESSION

Author’s Confession: The Long Road Back

I must tell you something I have not yet admitted aloud, not in the pages that follow, not in the hopeful language I have labored to maintain, and not even in the blueprint I have drafted with purpose and resolve.

I do not believe this will happen. Not soon. Not in my lifetime.

The book you hold is an act of will, not of belief. It is written with clarity, urgency, and conviction, but against the current of history, not with it. I write because I must, because it is my duty as a citizen, as a survivor of this national unraveling. But in my heart, I do not think we will see a renewal soon, not this year, not this decade. It's likely not even this generation.

We did not arrive at the age of Trump and theocracy, ignorance, and authoritarianism overnight. It took us fifty years to fall this far, a slow, deliberate collapse of moral infrastructure, of civic institutions, of public trust. The rot began long before Trump gave it a name. And if history is any guide, it will take at least two generations to undo what has been done if it can be undone.

The American people, in their ignorance and their rage, have smashed the furniture of democracy. They have handed power to the cruel, mocked the wise, elevated the liar, and scorned the servant. And now we live in the ruin.

The courts are compromised, the Congress is broken, and the culture is hollowed out. The very idea of good governance has been made suspect, replaced with spectacle, grievance, and a politics of permanent rage.

I have lived long enough to say this without fear of cynicism: my life has traced the arc of America’s moral decline. I have watched as decency was downgraded to naïveté and cruelty promoted as strength. I have watched self-interest devour civic duty, and demagogues rise while truth-tellers were driven into obscurity.

Still, I wrote this book, mapped out the future I wish we would choose, and dared to imagine a republic rebuilt.

Not because I expect it, but because someone must record what the path back looks like, even if we do not take it.

This book is not a prophecy. It is a mirror and a map. It reflects our failure and offers direction, should anyone one day have the courage to care again.

I do not write for the now. I write for the day when memory returns and conscience awakens. For the day when truth is no longer taboo. For the grandchildren of the generation that let this happen, in the faint hope that they may see what their parents would not.

So take these pages not as a promise but as a possibility.
A chance.
A blueprint, not for the present, but for a republic that still waits to be reborn.

William James Spriggs

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

The Wall Must Hold: Why Church and State Must Stay Separate

Throughout human history, the marriage of religion and state has yielded bloodshed, tyranny, and oppression. Whether under the divine right of kings, papal authority, or modern theocracy, the fusion of spiritual dogma with political power has proven to be a recipe for authoritarianism and cultural stagnation.

The Founders of the United States understood this. They had studied history and, in many cases, fled from it. They saw firsthand the dangers of governments ruled by religious decree, where heresy was a crime, conscience was policed, and faith became a weapon.

They resolved to build something different: a secular republic founded on reason, liberty, and pluralism, where belief was protected but never imposed.

Today, that founding principle is under attack. The threat is not from abroad. It comes from within.

A Global Lesson: When Church Rules State

History offers sobering lessons from civilizations that fused religion and governance:

  • In medieval Europe, the Catholic Church dictated monarchs, censored science, and sanctioned inquisitions and crusades.
  • In Islamic caliphates, dissenters and minorities were often silenced or subjugated in the name of divine law.
  • In Puritan New England, “blasphemers” and “witches” were executed based on religious hysteria.

Even in modern times:

  • Iran has shown how a religious revolution can curdle into an authoritarian theocracy.
  • Saudi Arabia, under Wahhabi Islam, imposes religious law that criminalizes apostasy and represses women and minorities.
  • India, once a secular democracy, now teeters toward Hindu nationalism, where state power increasingly enforces religious supremacy.

In every case, the consequences are the same: rights are crushed, minorities suffer, and truth bends to dogma.

The American Design: A Wall of Separation

The Founders of the United States knew this danger intimately. That’s why they embedded secularism at the heart of the Constitution.

  • The First Amendment declares: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
  • Thomas Jefferson called this a “wall of separation between church and state.”
  • James Madison, author of the First Amendment, warned that if religion and government were united, it would “destroy both.”

The Constitution mentions no deity. There is no religious test for office. The early republic even signed treaties (like the Treaty of Tripoli) affirming that the U.S. was “not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.”

What they built was not anti-religious. It was religiously neutral, a framework where faith was personal, not political, and where government existed to protect rights, not souls.

The Betrayal: How Religion Invaded American Politics

Despite the constitutional firewall, the 20th century saw a growing movement to turn religion into political currency. This trend reached dangerous momentum in the 1980s with the rise of the Religious Right.

  • Pat Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition, and Jerry Falwell, founder of Liberty University, led a movement that sought to "Christianize" government policy.
  • They equated moral legitimacy with evangelical dogma and openly declared war on secular governance.
  • Their influence grew, fueling the rise of the Moral Majority, merging conservative Christianity with Republican politics.

This movement made abortion, school prayer, creationism, and anti-LGBTQ policies central to a new religious-political identity.

What began as cultural advocacy became a crusade for theocracy, not through military takeover, but through courts, school boards, and state legislatures.

Today’s Crisis: A Nation Drifting Toward Theocracy

In 2024 and beyond, this fusion has reached dangerous new heights:

  • The Supreme Court, now stacked with judges endorsed by the Religious Right, has eroded the Establishment Clause and greenlit religious exemptions that erode civil rights.
  • Project 2025, a blueprint for authoritarian transformation, seeks to embed Christian nationalism into federal governance, replacing civil servants with ideological loyalists.
  • Politicians openly speak of the U.S. as a Christian nation, advocating laws that reflect Biblical rather than constitutional values.
  • Religious doctrines, including book bans, censorship of science, and the undermining of sex education, are hijacking public education.

What we are witnessing is not a political debate. It is a systematic effort to remake the United States into a theocracy.

Why Secular Government Is Non-Negotiable

Secularism is not hostile to religion. It allows religion to flourish freely without fear of state interference or mandated belief.

The dangers of merging religion and government include:

  1. The erosion of minority rights – Religious law becomes dogmatic tyranny.
  2. The end of rational policy-making – Public health, climate science, and education suffer under faith-based denialism.
  3. Religious hypocrisy – Institutions that claim moral authority are often rife with scandal and abuse when unchecked by secular scrutiny.
  4. Moral arrogance – The belief that one group speaks for God breeds violence, exclusion, and war.
  5. The silencing of conscience – True faith requires freedom. Theocracy destroys that freedom.

Secular governance is the guarantor of pluralism. It is the only system that protects both the religious and the non-religious, the devout and the doubter, equally under the law.

The Way Forward: Rebuilding the Wall

We must act now to restore the separation of church and state—not just in word but also in law and culture.

  1. Reaffirm the Establishment Clause in public policy and judicial interpretation.
  2. End religious favoritism in government funding, education, and social programs.
  3. Ban religious indoctrination in public schools, including the teaching of creationism and state-sanctioned prayer.
  4. Strip tax exemptions from churches that engage in political campaigning.
  5. Educate the public about the secular roots of the Constitution and the global dangers of theocratic rule.

This is not about attacking faith. It is about protecting freedom.

A Choice Between Liberty and Theocracy

The United States faces a stark choice. We can restore the secular republic, where all beliefs are protected, but none are imposed. Or we can continue down the path toward a Christian nationalist state, where rights depend on conformity and power hides behind pulpits.

Religion can inspire love, charity, and wisdom when confined to the personal.
But religion, when merged with government, becomes a weapon.

To preserve democracy, we must maintain secularism.
The wall must hold.

William James Spriggs

WORKER COOPERATIVES

Worker Cooperatives: Reclaiming Ownership, Reviving Democracy

Imagine a business where decisions are made by the people who work there, not by distant shareholders or billionaire owners, but by the very employees who keep the lights on and the wheels turning. Imagine profits being shared equitably, working conditions decided democratically, and the company's long-term success aligned with its workforce's well-being.

This isn’t a fantasy. It’s a worker cooperative, a model of economic democracy that has proven both morally compelling and economically sound. It may be one of the most powerful yet underused tools to combat inequality, restore community wealth, and reclaim economic control for ordinary people.

What Is a Worker Cooperative?

A worker cooperative is a business owned and self-managed by its employees. Every worker-owner:

  • Has a share in the business,
  • Votes on major decisions (one person, one vote),
  • Shares in the profits,
  • And often serves on elected committees or governance bodies.

Unlike traditional corporations, where decisions are made to benefit shareholders, often at the expense of workers and communities, worker cooperatives align ownership with labor.

They are democratic, rooted in the community, and often far more stable in times of economic downturn.

A Forgotten American Tradition: SAIC and Beyond

The United States has a long but often overlooked history of worker ownership. One notable example you mentioned is Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).

Founded in 1969 by Dr. J. Robert Beyster, SAIC was one of the first major employee-owned tech firms. Beyster believed that scientists and engineers should share ownership in the ideas they helped create. The company grew rapidly under this cooperative model, with over 40,000 employees eventually participating in its employee-ownership program. SAIC’s success proved that employee ownership could work in small shops, co-ops, and complex, high-tech industries.

Though SAIC eventually shifted away from its original structure after going public, it remains a powerful example of how a worker-owned enterprise can thrive at scale.

Other historical examples include:

  • Cooperative Home Care Associates (CHCA) in the Bronx, a worker-owned business employing over 2,000 home health aides, mostly women of color, who control their workplace and share in its success.
  • Equal Exchange is a fair-trade food company owned by its workers, prioritizing ethical sourcing and worker governance.

International Models: Scaling Worker Ownership

Worker cooperatives are not just successful in isolated cases. They have thrived internationally, especially in countries that support them through policy and infrastructure.

• Spain – The Mondragon Corporation

Perhaps the most famous example is Mondragon, a federation of over 90 worker cooperatives based in the Basque region of Spain. Founded in 1956, it now employs over 80,000 workers, all owners. Decisions are made democratically, and profits are reinvested in the community. Mondragon operates in finance, manufacturing, education, and retail, proving that worker ownership can scale across sectors.

• Italy – Emilia-Romagna Region

Home to one of the densest networks of cooperatives in the world, this region’s success stems from supportive laws, local investment funds, and cooperative education. Cooperatives here are highly productive and woven into the community's social and economic fabric.

• Argentina – Worker Recaptured Factories

Following the 2001 economic collapse, thousands of workers in Argentina took over abandoned factories and turned them into cooperatives. Many of these cooperatives still operate despite legal and financial challenges.


Why Worker Cooperatives Work

Studies consistently show that worker-owned firms:

  • Are more resilient during recessions.
  • Pay better wages and have lower wage gaps.
  • Experience lower turnover and higher employee satisfaction.
  • Invest more in community and environmental sustainability.

Perhaps most importantly, they help address the massive wealth inequality that has grown under shareholder capitalism. By giving workers equity and voice, cooperatives build assets and power where they’re needed most.

The Challenges and How to Fix Them

Worker cooperatives are not a silver bullet. They face obstacles:

  • Lack of access to capital since traditional lenders are wary of non-traditional governance.
  • Legal and regulatory frameworks that don’t recognize or support the cooperative model.
  • Lack of awareness and education among workers and entrepreneurs.

But these are solvable problems if we choose to solve them.

A Policy Blueprint for Strengthening Worker Cooperatives

To scale worker ownership in the United States, Project 2029 proposes:

• Create a Federal Cooperative Development Agency

  • Modeled on the Small Business Administration.
  • Provides seed funding, technical assistance, and training to cooperative startups and conversions.
  • Offers grants to regional co-op development centers and incubators.

• Tax Incentives for Conversions

  • Business owners who sell to their employees (primarily upon retirement) should receive capital gains tax deferrals or exemptions.
  • Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) transitions should be fast-tracked toward full cooperative governance.

• Cooperative Incubators at Community Colleges

  • Embed cooperative training programs within vocational and entrepreneurship tracks.
  • Connect students with pathways to cooperative ownership.

• Legal Recognition and Simplification

  • States and the federal government must formally update corporate codes to recognize worker cooperatives.
  • Provide model bylaws, governance templates, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

• Public Procurement Preferences

  • Give contracting preference to cooperatives and employee-owned businesses in public purchasing.

A Moral and Democratic Imperative

Worker cooperatives are more than a business model. They are a democratic alternative to corporate feudalism. In an age of billionaire consolidation, gig work exploitation, and economic insecurity, cooperatives offer a path toward shared power, wealth, and responsibility.

This is not charity. It is justice. The economy functions as it should, not for profit alone but for people and the community.

If democracy is to mean anything in the 21st century, it must exist in the voting booth and the workplace. Strengthening worker cooperatives is how we get there.

William James Spriggs

WORKER POWER

Reclaiming Worker Power: The Case for a Strong Labor Union Revival

Workers built America. Railroads, factories, skyscrapers, shipyards, mines, and bridges were not the products of boardrooms. They were carved into existence by laborers. But for most of American history, those workers had to fight tooth and nail just to be treated with dignity. That fight gave birth to one of the most powerful engines of economic justice the country has ever known: labor unions.

Unions gave workers a voice. They fought for better wages, safer conditions, and shorter hours. They created the American middle class. But over time, they were weakened by corporate backlash, political sabotage, and systemic neglect.

Today, the U.S. labor movement is at a crossroads. Union membership has collapsed, inequality has skyrocketed, and corporate power is as aggressive as ever.

If we want to restore fairness, stability, and true democracy to our economy, we must rebuild the labor union movement and do it now.

A Brief History: The Rise of American Labor Unions

U.S. labor unions date back to the early 19th century when workers in emerging industries began to organize against abusive practices in rapidly industrializing cities.

Key milestones include:

  • 1866: The National Labor Union, the first national labor federation, is formed, advocating for an 8-hour workday.
  • 1886: The American Federation of Labor (AFL) was founded under Samuel Gompers and focused on skilled labor and collective bargaining.
  • 1935: The Wagner Act (National Labor Relations Act) guarantees workers the right to unionize and bargain collectively. It also established the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
  • 1930s–1950s: The labor movement reaches its peak. The Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) organizes mass production workers. Union membership climbs to over 35% of the workforce.
  • During this period, unions help win Social Security, Medicare, the minimum wage, unemployment insurance, and the 40-hour workweek.

The Decline: Corporate Counteroffensive and Legislative Sabotage

The postwar golden age of unions began to erode in the late 1970s.

  • 1970s–1980s: Deindustrialization, globalization, and automation begin to shrink unionized industries like steel and auto manufacturing.
  • 1981: President Reagan fires over 11,000 striking air traffic controllers, sending a message that corporate America has the upper hand. Employers begin adopting aggressive anti-union tactics.
  • Right-to-work laws, enabled by the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, spread nationwide, weakening union funding and solidarity.
  • Corporations increasingly hire union-busting consultants, threaten to close facilities, and intimidate workers who try to organize.
  • Public perception of unions is eroded by media narratives of corruption and inefficiency—often fed by industries that benefit from weak labor laws.

Today, only about 10% of American workers and 6% of private-sector workers belong to a union.

Meanwhile, income inequality is worse than at any time since the Gilded Age, and CEO pay has exploded to over 350 times the average worker's wage.

Global Comparisons: What Strong Labor Movements Can Achieve

The decline of American unions is not inevitable. It is the product of deliberate political and corporate choices.

In many advanced democracies, strong labor unions are still central to national life, and their economies are more equitable.

Consider:

  • Germany: Workers have guaranteed seats on corporate boards through a system of co-determination. Union density is over 17%, and collective bargaining covers nearly 50% of the workforce.
  • Sweden: Around 70% of workers are union members. Unions help administer unemployment insurance and negotiate wages nationally.
  • Norway, Denmark, and Finland: Similar high union membership and strong collective bargaining coverage, contributing to some of the lowest income inequality in the world.
  • France: Though union membership is low (~10%), legal protections for union-negotiated agreements cover 90% of the workforce.

In these countries, unions are not viewed as threats to the economy. They are seen as partners in national prosperity

How to Rebuild Labor in America

A strong labor movement won’t rebuild itself. It will take bold policy, political will, and a cultural shift. Here’s how:

1. Pass the PRO Act

The Protecting the Right to Organize Act would:

  • Ban “captive audience” anti-union meetings.
  • Penalize employers for retaliating against union efforts.
  • Make it easier to form unions through card check recognition.
  • Reclassify misclassified “independent contractors” as employees.

2. Guarantee Sectoral Bargaining

Like in Europe, unions can negotiate industry-wide contracts, not just one workplace at a time. This levels the playing field and prevents a race to the bottom.

3. Mandate Worker Representation

Require worker-elected board members on large corporate boards and establish works councils to give employees a voice in management decisions.

4. Strengthen Federal Enforcement

Fully fund the NLRB, prosecute union-busting as a felony, and create public legal support for organizing workers.

5. Incentivize Unionization

Offer tax benefits to companies that allow unionization without interference—and penalize those that violate labor rights.

6. Reframe the Narrative

Unions are not relics of the past. They are the most effective force for economic justice created by working people. We must teach labor history, support union culture, and fight against decades of corporate propaganda.

A Word to Corporate America

A revitalized labor movement is not your enemy. Strong unions create stable markets, reduce turnover, raise productivity, and build consumer demand. Workers with decent wages spend more, build wealth, and stabilize communities.

If corporations want long-term growth, they must stop treating labor as a cost to be minimized and start treating it as a partner in prosperity.

Unions don’t just protect workers. They protect democracy itself.

Democracy Requires a Strong Labor Movement

At its heart, a labor union is simply this: a group of people who believe they deserve a say in how their labor is used and its fruits are shared.

That belief is not radical. It is foundational to democracy.

Labor has been present in every era when democracy has expanded, and it has been the first target every time democracy has contracted.

It’s time to rebuild. To organize. To reclaim what was taken.

The labor movement built the middle class. It can rebuild the nation.

William James Spriggs

Thursday, June 5, 2025

Existence

You don't exist; if you did, you just didn't. Before you were born, you didn't exist. After you die, you don't exist. The moment of now does not exist. It didn't exist in the past, and it will not exist in the future. The moment we just had has passed into nonexistence. The future does not exist. The moment we are currently in does not exist in the past or the future, so it does not exist.

THE BETTER DEMOCRACY

Reimagining Democracy

Democracy in the United States has failed, not in the distant future, not in theory, but right now, in plain sight, in real-time, before the eyes of a population that saw it coming and did too little to stop it. The American experiment, once heralded as a model of liberty and self-governance, has been undone not by foreign invasion or civil war but by capitalism unchained, by religious extremism weaponized, and by an electorate stripped of hope, agency, and truth.

It did not happen overnight. But its final unraveling felt sudden because we refused to accept how fragile American democracy was.

Democracy Is Not Enough

The lesson is clear: democracy alone is not self-sustaining. A system of elections, free speech, and judicial checks is necessary but insufficient in an economic and cultural framework designed to elevate the few and abandon the many.

  • Unregulated capitalism has created a vast economic inequality in which power has been privatized.
  • Dogmatic religion has stepped into the moral vacuum, replacing compassion with cruelty and freedom with fanaticism.
  • Corporate domination, enabled by deregulation and privatization, has turned every sphere of life, from healthcare to housing and justice education, into a marketplace where citizenship is measured by what one can afford.

This is how democracy dies: not with a coup, but with a transaction. And it is time we tell the truth; only democratic socialism can save what remains.

The Moral and Practical Case for Democratic Socialism

Democratic socialism is not about state control or central planning. It is not authoritarian. It is not the Soviet Union. It is not Venezuela. It is not some imported ideology that is the logical extension of our highest democratic values: fairness, equality, participation, and collective responsibility.

To survive, democracy must live in the workplace, our neighborhoods, our wallets, and our daily lives. That means:

  • Egalitarian policies that reduce obscene income inequality
  • Worker cooperatives where employees govern their labor
  • Universal healthcare and education, available to all as human rights
  • Strong labor unions and guaranteed worker representation
  • Reclaiming public goods from private profiteers
  • Progressive taxation that funds shared prosperity
  • Anti-racist social programs that correct structural injustice

This is not a utopia. This is the minimum required to prevent collapse.

How Capitalism Undermines Democracy

Capitalism, when unrestrained, erodes democracy from the inside. It does so in five fundamental ways:

  1. It creates a vast class divide in which political power becomes a commodity. The rich buy laws; they punish the poor.
  2. It privatizes public goods. What once belonged to everyone, water, energy, education, and infrastructure, is sold to the highest bidder.
  3. It feeds racism and scapegoating. When people are desperate, they are more easily divided, and capitalism thrives on division.
  4. It hollowed out civic engagement. When survival becomes personal, community becomes optional. “I want mine, and I want yours” becomes the national creed.
  5. It devalues empathy. In a market-driven society, kindness has no currency.

The result is a democracy in form but not in substance, a shell, a façade, a rigged game of elections propped up by lobbyists, billionaires, and media owned by six corporations.

Reclaiming Government as a Force for Public Good

Republicans have long demonized government as the enemy while using it to enrich themselves and their donors. Since Reagan, they have pursued tax cuts for the wealthy and spending spikes for the military while gutting every institution that served the common good.

The result is a self-fulfilling prophecy: a government starved of revenue becomes ineffective and then blames itself for its own malnutrition.

We must reverse this by asserting that government is not the enemy of freedom but the tool by which freedom is made real. Only government, transparent, democratic, and accountable can:

  • Regulate markets to serve people, not exploit them
  • Redistribute wealth to prevent oligarchy
  • Protect the planet from environmental collapse
  • Enshrine universal rights over corporate privileges

We need massive reinvestment in healthcare, education, housing, food, transit, and climate resilience. We must also take back everything that has been privatized because essential services should not be profit centers.

Empathy, Not Extraction

Democratic socialism demands a cultural shift from hyper-individualism to shared responsibility, from zero-sum competition to mutual survival, from “I win, you lose” to “we rise together.”

That means rejecting the toxic ethos of "every man for himself" and replacing it with a moral code that honors empathy, cooperation, and care, not out of charity but of necessity. No democracy can function when people believe they are alone.

The Republic Requires a Systemic Shift

We are not calling for cosmetic reform. We are calling for a new foundation.
It is not a restoration of the past but a construction of a future where democracy is durable through economic fairness, shared power, and collective care.

The choice is stark:
Democratic socialism, or democratic collapse.
A nation of solidarity or a nation of scavengers.
Empathy. or extinction.

There is no fear in socialism. The only fear is in doing nothing.

Reimagine democracy. Reclaim the republic. Redistribute power.

William James Spriggs