UNBRIDLED CAPITALISM PROMOTES RACISM

Unbridled Capitalism Promotes Racism

The American experiment, once celebrated as a beacon of democracy and freedom, has been imperiled by the failure to control capitalism. While the United States has maintained a semblance of democracy for nearly 250 years, the unchecked growth and consolidation of capitalist power have created the conditions for the rise of fascism. This outcome is not a coincidence but an inevitable consequence of allowing capitalism to operate without limitations.

Capitalism: An Antithesis to Equality

One of the most insidious aspects of unbridled capitalism is its inherent opposition to egalitarianism and equality of opportunity. At its core, capitalism is a system built on individual profit, competition, and wealth accumulation. Within this framework, there is no room for equal opportunity, as success is often predicated on exploiting disparities rather than leveling the playing field. This dynamic naturally fosters discrimination and prejudice, particularly against racial minorities.

Capitalism’s profit-driven mentality has, over time, entrenched systemic racism within American society. Since capitalism thrives on competition rather than cooperation, it inevitably pits individuals and groups against one another, fostering an environment where those already disadvantaged remain perpetually marginalized. Racial minorities, historically kept at an economic and social disadvantage, continue to face barriers that capitalism not only perpetuates but requires to maintain its hierarchical structure.

Racism: A Necessary Byproduct of Capitalism

Racism in America is not merely an unfortunate social ill that coincides with capitalism; it is an essential component of a system that prioritizes individual gain over collective well-being. Unbridled capitalism encourages a mentality of 'me first,' where success is measured by how much wealth one can accumulate, often at the expense of others. In this framework, minority groups are often seen as obstacles or competitors rather than equal participants.

This divisive mindset has made it nearly impossible to address racism separately from capitalism itself. Any attempts to combat racial inequality that do not also confront the profit-driven, individualistic culture of capitalism are bound to fail. Capitalism inherently supports the creation of social hierarchies, leading to the formation of a de facto caste system where those at the top solidify their power while those at the bottom remain oppressed.

Oligarchy and the Fall of Democracy

As capitalism continues to thrive without restraint, it inevitably leads to oligarchy, the rule of the few wealthy over the many. Economic inequality becomes entrenched, and political power shifts to those who can afford to influence policy through wealth. In this way, capitalism naturally gravitates toward creating kings rather than empowering citizens, undermining the democratic ethos of equal representation and opportunity.

The trajectory is clear: unbridled capitalism leads to oligarchy, and oligarchy paves the way for authoritarianism. As wealth consolidates, the power to shape the nation’s future falls into fewer hands, and democracy erodes. The rise of fascism in America is not an accident but a predictable outcome of capitalism’s failure to balance economic power with social responsibility.

Replacing Capitalism to Save Democracy

To preserve democratic ideals, capitalism as we know it must be controlled or replaced with a system that prioritizes the public good over private gain. While the exact form of this new system remains open to discussion, one thing is clear. As long as capitalism remains unchecked, racism and inequality will continue to thrive, and democracy will remain under threat. The survival of the American experiment hinges on our willingness to rethink the role of capitalism in society, confront its failures, and envision a system that upholds the principles of equality and justice.

William James Spriggs

CAPITALISM KILLED DEMOCRACY

Capitalism and the Demise of Democracy

The United States of America once heralded as the bastion of democracy, now stands as a somber example of how capitalism can erode democratic values and institutions over time. It took nearly 250 years, but capitalism, with its inherent inequalities, has succeeded in undermining the core principles of democracy. Fascism, the antithesis of democracy, has emerged within a remarkably short span of just over five years, highlighting the rapidity with which authoritarianism can take hold when capitalism is left unchecked.

The Incompatibility of Capitalism and Democracy

Capitalism is a system designed for economic gain, prioritizing profit and competition over collective welfare and equality. There is nothing inherently egalitarian within capitalism. On the contrary, it thrives on disparity, fostering a society where wealth accumulation becomes the ultimate measure of success. This structure inherently disadvantages the majority, consolidating power in the hands of a wealthy few while eroding the foundational democratic value of equality among citizens.

Capitalism not only fails to promote equality but actively subverts it. Wealth becomes concentrated in fewer hands, and those who amass capital wield disproportionate influence over public policy. This phenomenon has played out in the United States as corporate interests infiltrate every facet of governance, from the legislative process to judicial appointments. The result is a government more attuned to the demands of big business than the needs of ordinary citizens.

Authoritarian Challenges and Corporate Domination

Capitalism inherently encourages authoritarian tendencies because power, once consolidated, naturally seeks to sustain itself. Corporate interests, once entrenched, act to suppress dissent and maintain the status quo. This reality manifests in the increasing prevalence of corporate lobbying, political donations, and the revolving door between government and private industry. Corporate capture of public institutions leads to the prioritization of profit over public welfare, eroding social safety nets and perpetuating economic inequality.

As the gap between the rich and the poor widens, social tensions escalate, and the disenfranchised masses become increasingly marginalized. This atmosphere is fertile ground for authoritarian leaders who capitalize on public discontent while perpetuating the very systems that caused the grievances. In this way, capitalism indirectly fosters conditions conducive to fascism.

Capitalism’s Attack on the Public Good

Capitalism does not prioritize the public good. In a profit-driven system, social programs, education, healthcare, and other public welfare initiatives are seen as burdens rather than investments. Under capitalist influence, the United States has seen a decline in public infrastructure, the weakening of unions, and the erosion of workers’ rights. Profit is prioritized even at the cost of societal well-being, and the most vulnerable members of society bear the brunt of neglect.

Democracy Undermined: The Corporate State

A democracy’s health relies on active, informed participation by all citizens and a commitment to the common good. However, capitalism’s corporate dominance skews this balance, creating a de facto oligarchy where money dictates political outcomes. The rise of fascism within such a system becomes almost inevitable as democratic institutions weaken and the public loses faith in governance designed to serve only the elite.

The Urgency for Change

To salvage democracy, the United States must confront the inherent contradictions between capitalism and democratic governance. This means implementing regulations that curb corporate power, ensuring that public policy is determined by the people rather than profit, and revitalizing the concept of equality as a fundamental right. The alternative is to accept the continued erosion of democracy and the rise of an authoritarian state driven not by the will of the people but by the relentless pursuit of wealth.

In essence, democracy cannot survive in a purely capitalistic society. To preserve democratic values, we must fundamentally rethink how economic systems intersect with governance, ensuring that the pursuit of profit does not outweigh the principles of equality and public service.

William James Spriggs

NEW BOOK INTRODUCTION

The Lie We Lived

America was built on a promise. It was an audacious experiment, an idea so radical that it shook the foundations of the old world: that power could rest not in kings, aristocrats, or priests but in the hands of ordinary people. That government would be accountable to the governed. That law would apply equally to all. That truth and reason would guide our politics and that liberty, once secured, would endure.

We were raised to believe that democracy was not just an idea but an unbreakable reality. No matter how dark the days or how strong the opposition, the system would self-correct, the truth would win, and justice would prevail. We thought America had safeguards, laws, institutions, and elections that would make tyranny impossible. We assured ourselves that a demagogue could never take control here, that the people would always reject dictatorship, that the mistakes of history belonged to other nations, to other peoples, to a distant and less enlightened past.

It was all a lie.

Not a deliberate lie, perhaps, but a myth we told ourselves to avoid facing the fragility of our system. Because the truth is this: democracy was never permanent. It was never self-sustaining. It was an ongoing struggle that required constant vigilance, education, and a shared moral code. And America, lulled into arrogance and complacency, let all three slip away.

We let ignorance become a political force, no longer something to be corrected but something to be embraced and weaponized. We let wealth buy power so that laws became tools of the few rather than protections for the many. We let religious extremists creep into government, stripping away the barrier between church and state, replacing reason with dogma, and turning faith into a justification for oppression.

Worst of all, we ignored the warnings. We saw the signs: leaders who praised dictators, dismissed truth as inconvenient, encouraged violence, attacked the press, and dismantled the guardrails of democracy one by one, and we did nothing. We told ourselves the system would hold. We told ourselves the courts would stop them. We told ourselves that "it could never happen here."

But it has.

America is no longer a democracy. That is not a statement of fear but a statement of fact. The transition is complete. What we are witnessing now is not the destruction of democracy; it is what comes after. It is the entrenchment of a new order: an oligarchy ruled by billionaires, a theocracy dictated by religious fundamentalists, and an autocracy controlled by a man who views himself as above the law.

There is no cavalry coming, no institutional failsafe, no automatic correction. There is no next election that will fix this, and there is no Supreme Court ruling that will undo what has been done. The game has been rigged, the rules are rewritten, and those who hold power will not give it up willingly.

So, what do we do?

This book is not a warning. Warnings are for those who still have time to act. This is a reckoning, a reflection on what has already happened and what it means for those of us who now live under the reality of American fascism. Some will accept it, some will fight it, and some will flee.

But the lie is dead. The illusion has shattered.

The question now is not whether America can be saved. It is whether America, as we knew it, still exists at all.

William James Spriggs

 

BEYOND FASCISM, A NEW SOCIETY

A Democratic Alternative

A troubling trend is emerging in both the United States and Europe. As fascistic movements gain momentum, there is a growing temptation among many to focus on preserving the fragmented remnants of our democracy rather than addressing the underlying issues that have allowed such movements to thrive. This defensive approach, while understandable, risks overlooking a fundamental truth: it may have been the inherent weaknesses within non-socialist democracy that brought us to this precarious point.

The rise of authoritarian ideologies did not happen in a vacuum. It is the result of a long process of social and economic decay, one that has deepened the class divide, entrenched systemic racism, and eroded the notion of the public good. The capitalist model prioritizes profit over people and has led to a hollowed-out public sphere, where community welfare and social equity have been neglected in favor of individual gain and corporate dominance.

Yet, the revolution that might challenge this system still feels distant, more an idealistic aspiration than a practical reality. Even so, the current task is straightforward: we must address the class disparity, confront racism head-on, and restore the value of the public good. We cannot afford to merely survive under the status quo, patching together a fractured democratic framework while ignoring its inherent flaws.

The only genuine democratic alternative is pursuing an equal opportunity, worker-sponsored socialist society. Such a society would prioritize collective well-being over individual accumulation, placing decision-making power into workers' hands rather than concentrating it among the economic elite. It would be a democracy not just in name but in practice. Equality and fairness are the foundations of governance in this society, and the public good is once again a central tenet of our collective identity.

To confront the rising tide of authoritarianism, we must be bold in reimagining democracy. We must not settle for the mere preservation of democracy’s fragmented pieces but strive to rebuild it on more solid, equitable ground. In the face of this challenge, the choice becomes stark: will we resist by merely clinging to what remains, or will we dare to imagine and build a genuinely democratic future, one rooted in equality, justice, and collective empowerment?

William James Spriggs

AMERICA'S MORAL BANKRUPTCY

The Moral Bankruptcy of America

It has become almost cliché to speak of the United States of America's moral bankruptcy. Lying, dishonesty, stealing, and fabricating reality have become the order of the day. Tragically, at least half of the population engages in this behavior, and it is fast becoming the official position of the government itself to lie, cheat, and be dishonest. Morality has flown out the window in this new paradigm, leaving America without a moral compass.

One reason for this moral decline is the lack of empathy. One must have empathy to possess a moral compass, a moral code, and a sense of morality. Yet today, narcissism has replaced empathy as the guiding force of the American conscience. It’s everyone for himself, and the new social doctrine is to take from others if you can. Narcissism is not only tolerated but glorified. Alarmingly, we even elect leaders on this basis alone. Narcissism, by its very definition, is the absence of empathy.

When empathy is introduced, morality can return. Empathy requires feeling for and understanding others. Only with empathy can we follow a moral code that refrains from lying or cheating and recognizes fact over fiction. A moral society does not glorify selfishness but instead values compassion and honesty.

The erosion of morality in America is not merely a personal failing; it’s a societal one. Institutions, politics, and public life reflect the pervasive narcissism, leading to a culture where the truth no longer matters. The consequences of this collective moral failure are profound. Trust erodes, relationships break down, and democracy itself is threatened when leaders manipulate the truth, and individuals become complicit in the spread of dishonesty.

Rebuilding America’s moral foundation requires a fundamental shift toward empathy. We must revalue truthfulness, fairness, and duty to others. As long as narcissism continues to dominate our collective psyche, morality will remain elusive, and our nation will continue to suffer. We must choose empathy to reclaim our moral identity.

William James Spriggs

TRUMP LOSES SO FAR

STATUS OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST TRUMP

Recent judicial actions have resulted in injunctions against several policies that President Donald Trump's administration has implemented. These cases involve statutory interpretations and administrative procedures, though some also raise constitutional questions. Below is an analysis of notable cases and the likelihood of the Supreme Court granting certiorari:​

1. Fast-Tracking Deportations to Third Countries

• Case Overview: U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued a nationwide temporary restraining order blocking the administration from expediting deportations of migrants to third countries without allowing them to claim persecution or torture. The policy, enacted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on February 18, aimed to accelerate deportations of migrants previously released from detention. The judge emphasized protections under the Convention Against Torture. ​Reuters
• Supreme Court Review Likelihood: This case involves significant questions about executive authority and compliance with international treaties. Given the broader implications for immigration policy and the potential conflict among lower courts, the Supreme Court may be inclined to review the case to clarify these issues.​

2. Dismantling of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)

• Case Overview: U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued a preliminary injunction preventing the administration from dismantling the CFPB, an agency established to protect consumers from financial fraud. The ruling mandates the continuation of critical consumer services and the rehiring of staff, including a student-loan borrower adviser. ​
• Supreme Court Review Likelihood: The case raises questions about the separation of powers and the extent of executive authority to alter or dismantle independent agencies created by Congress. Given the constitutional implications and the potential impact on the administrative state, the Supreme Court may find it appropriate to grant certiorari.​

3. Deportations Under the Alien Enemies Act

• Case Overview: A federal appeals court upheld a block on the administration's order to deport Venezuelan migrants under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a wartime law. The case, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of detained Venezuelan noncitizens, emphasizes the protection of due process rights. ​
• Supreme Court Review Likelihood: This case involves the interpretation of a rarely invoked historical statute and its application in contemporary immigration enforcement. The constitutional questions regarding due process and the executive's wartime powers may prompt the Supreme Court to review the case to resolve these complex legal issues.​

4. Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship

• Case Overview: Multiple federal judges have issued preliminary injunctions blocking President Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants. These rulings assert that the order violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. ​
• Supreme Court Review Likelihood: Given the direct constitutional challenge and the fundamental questions about the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, it is highly likely that the Supreme Court would grant certiorari to provide a definitive ruling on this significant issue.​

While constitutional issues increase the likelihood of the Supreme Court granting certiorari, the Court also considers cases involving significant questions of federal law, statutory interpretation, and conflicts among lower courts. The recent injunctions against Trump administration policies present a mix of constitutional and statutory issues, suggesting that the Supreme Court may choose to review these cases to provide clarity and uniformity in the law.

These cases are all law school examination-type questions that the Supreme Court should answer by agreeing with the lower court (s). Sadly, it probably will not.

William James Spriggs

STOP BEATING THE DEAD HORSE

Democrats: Stop Beating Dead Horses and Get Back on Task

Democrats have a bad habit of wasting precious time, and they’re doing it again.

Right now, instead of hammering home the message that the courts are pushing back against authoritarian overreach, they’re spending endless hours grilling incompetent Trump-era holdovers for a security breach that, frankly, is old news. Yes, these officials are fools. Yes, they’re political hacks. Yes, they were unqualified from the start. But everyone already knows that. Rehashing their incompetence doesn’t move the needle; it’s just noise.

The time for exposing Trump’s unfit appointees has passed. The time for action is now.

The Real Fight Is in the Courts, and Democrats Are Winning

What Democrats should be doing is standing on the rooftops shouting about the real battle, the one that’s going their way. Right now, the courts are doing what Congress hasn’t been able to: stopping this administration from executing its most dangerous and unconstitutional schemes.

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia just upheld a lower court’s injunction. Whether the lower courts impose and uphold a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or a Preliminary Injunction, it doesn’t matter; the courts are blocking Trump’s agenda. That’s a win. And it’s time Democrats acted like it.

Why isn’t every Democratic leader in front of a microphone praising the judicial branch and reinforcing public faith in the rule of law? Why aren't they setting the stage for a major rally outside the Supreme Court, where the ultimate showdown will likely occur?

This is where the action is. This is where the future of American democracy is being decided.

Call Out Musk for What He Is: A Threat to Social Security

And while we're at it, why is Elon Musk getting a free pass on Social Security?

Musk and his ilk, billionaire anarcho-capitalists, would love nothing more than to privatize or eliminate Social Security altogether. Why? It represents everything they hate: a program that helps the vulnerable work efficiently and proves that the government can be a force for good.

Millions of Americans depend on Social Security. They earned it. And yet, Democrats are failing to defend it with the urgency it deserves. Where are the town halls, the rallies, and the TV ads showing retirees standing up against Musk’s libertarian fantasy?

This is a rallying cry just waiting to happen.

People on Social Security should be marching in the streets.
And Democrats should be leading that march.

Message Matters and Democrats Keep Missing It

It’s not enough to be correct. You have to be focused. You have to be loud. And you have to talk about what matters to voters right now.

The GOP is unified in pushing a dangerous, fascist agenda. But the Democrats are busy re-litigating the obvious while the battle is shifting to the courts and our streets.

So here’s the message Democrats need to deliver clearly and repeatedly:

1. The courts are pushing back, and we’re winning.
2. The next big fight is at the Supreme Court.
3. Elon Musk and the billionaire class are coming for Social Security.
4. We, the people, must mobilize to stop them.

It’s time to put down the dead horse and pick up the megaphone. The future depends on it.

William James Spriggs