ANTHOLOGY OF ARTICLES ON MORALITY

 

https://wspriggs2.blogspot.com/2024/05/morality-in-business.html

 

https://wspriggs2.blogspot.com/2024/05/how-do-you-know-what-is-right.html

 

https://wspriggs2.blogspot.com/2024/05/from-whence-moral-code.html

 

https://wspriggs2.blogspot.com/2024/05/the-supreme-courts-steep-fall-from-grace.html

 

https://wspriggs2.blogspot.com/2024/05/the-complete-collapse-of-morality-in.html

 

https://wspriggs2.blogspot.com/2024/04/in-search-of-character-traits.html

 

 

MORALITY IN BUSINESS

How Do You Know What is Right? Part II: Morality in Business

In our previous discussion, we delved into the intrinsic understanding of moral principles that have been ingrained in humanity over millennia. These principles, distinguishable from religious dogma, guide us in discerning right from wrong. However, the business world presents a paradox: why do immoral businesses often seem to thrive, while those adhering to ethical standards appear to be exploited?

This question is not new. History is replete with examples of tyrants and unscrupulous individuals who achieved temporary success. Yet, their legacies are marked by downfall and condemnation. Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Joseph Stalin, and others like them may have wielded power briefly, but their reigns ended in ruin. Even contemporary figures such as Donald Trump face relentless scrutiny and eventual accountability. The immoral competitor will have its comeuppance. Right is might, and in the grand scheme of time, it will prevail.

This principle is particularly resonant within the Marine Corps values, where integrity, honor, and commitment are paramount. Marines may lose a skirmish, but they win the war through perseverance, ethical conduct, and unwavering dedication to their principles. The business world, though seemingly dominated by the unethical at times, operates under a similar paradigm.

In business, acting with morality can often feel like a disadvantage. Ethical companies may encounter setbacks, face exploitation, or lose to less scrupulous competitors in the short term. However, the long-term trajectory favors those who operate with integrity. Trust, reputation, and sustainability are built on ethical foundations, and they are the true markers of enduring success.

As an octogenarian reflecting on a lifetime of decisions, I find solace in the knowledge that doing the right thing is its own reward. Living a life guided by moral principles allows one to face the end with peace and acceptance. There is a profound victory in knowing that you have conducted yourself with honor, even if the path was not always easy or immediately rewarding.

Businesses grounded in morality contribute positively to society, foster trust among stakeholders, and create lasting value. While the path of integrity may be fraught with challenges, it ultimately leads to a more fulfilling and respected existence. The fleeting success of the immoral is just that—fleeting. Their legacies are tarnished by their actions, and their downfall is inevitable.

In conclusion, the journey of moral business practices is akin to the Marine Corps' ethos. The immediate battles may be tough, and losses may occur, but the war is won through steadfast adherence to ethical conduct. As we navigate the complexities of the business world, let us remain patient and committed to our principles, knowing that true success is measured not by temporary gains but by lasting impact and the ability to live with ourselves victoriously.

  

HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT IS RIGHT?

How Do You Know What's Right? Understanding Our Higher Moral Code

Introduction

The question of how we know what's right is as old as humanity itself. While some attribute our moral compass to religious teachings, a more compelling explanation lies in the evolution of human experience over thousands of years. This article explores the concept that morality is an intrinsic part of our human nature, embedded in our DNA, and essential for the survival of our species. We will also discuss the shortcomings of the religious reward and punishment system and its detrimental effects on proper moral behavior.

The Evolution of Morality

1.     Survival and Cooperation: From early human societies, cooperation and mutual support were crucial for survival. Those who acted altruistically and supported their community had a better chance of survival. Over time, these behaviors became hardwired into our psyche, creating an innate sense of right and wrong.

2.     Innate Knowledge of Right and Wrong: Humans have developed an intuitive understanding of morality through thousands of years of evolution. This moral code is, in a sense, embedded in our DNA. While some individuals may have a stronger inscription of this code than others, and some may be led astray by self-serving motives, the underlying sense of right and wrong remains.

Principles and Codes of Honor

Throughout history, societies have codified these intrinsic moral principles into various codes of honor and ethical guidelines. These codes often reflect the collective wisdom of generations, crystallizing behaviors that promote social harmony and individual well-being. However, the core of our moral understanding remains intuitive and shared across cultures and epochs.

The Fallacy of Rewards and Punishments

Religious teachings often emphasize rewards and punishments as tools for moral guidance. However, this approach is demonstrably unreliable and misdirected as a genuine contribution to morality. It creates an incentive to follow only those directions that promise a reward in the afterlife, leading to hypocrisy and a lack of genuine moral behavior.

1.     No Need for Carrots and Sticks: Humans do not require a carrot or a stick to understand and follow moral principles. Our ingrained sense of morality is sufficient to guide us, making external rewards and punishments redundant. Instead, these mechanisms often create fear and guilt, distorting our natural inclinations and leading to unhealthy behaviors.

2.     The Hypocrisy of Religious Morality: The religious reward and punishment system encourages individuals to care less about moral actions that only have real-world consequences. By focusing on an afterlife that does not exist, religious individuals may be misled away from reality and the enhancement of legitimate, real-world morality.

The Detrimental Effects of Religion

Religion, with its rigid doctrines and emphasis on an afterlife, can obstruct our inherent moral compass and lead to immoral actions. In the name of supporting an afterlife, religious individuals have committed acts such as war, torture, denial of civil rights, and other abuses.

1.     Religion as a Denial of Moral Truths: Organized religion can be a force that denies moral truths, promoting actions that harm individuals and societies. Religion detracts from our natural ability to discern and act on ethical principles by imposing arbitrary rules and fostering dependency on external validation.

2.     Immoral Acts in the Name of Religion: History is replete with examples of immoral acts committed in the name of religion. These actions, justified by the promise of rewards in an afterlife, highlight the dangers of relying on religious teachings for moral guidance. In reality, these acts often violate the innate moral code that promotes the well-being and survival of our species.

Conclusion

Our understanding of what's right is deeply rooted in our evolutionary history and collective human experience. Morality is not a product of religious doctrine but an intrinsic part of our nature, essential for the survival and flourishing of our species. While amoral behavior may rise, it highlights the importance of adhering to our highest moral standards. Those who honor these principles will continue to thrive and lead, while the amoral will be marginalized. Let us trust in our innate sense of right and wrong and strive to uphold the values that have guided humanity for millennia.

 

 

  

FROM WHENCE A MORAL CODE?

Embracing the Values, Codes, Mottos, and Leadership Qualities of Marine Corps Officers: A Guide for All

Introduction

The United States Marine Corps is renowned for its steadfast commitment to core values, codes, mottos, and exemplary leadership qualities. These guiding principles are vital to the success of Marine Corps officers and invaluable in everyday life. We can all strive for excellence and integrity by understanding and adopting these values. This article delves into the specific values of the Marine Corps and illustrates how they can inspire and guide us. These principles and values have evolved over thousands of years and are now part of the fabric of the innate moral code of the homo sapiens.

Marine Corps Core Values

1. Honor: Honor is the foundation of the Marine Corps. It encompasses honesty, responsibility, and respect. For a Marine Corps officer, honor means upholding the highest ethical standards and being accountable for their actions. In our daily lives, living with honor involves being truthful, acting with integrity, and respecting others.
2. Courage: Courage in the Marine Corps is about overcoming fear and adversity, both physically and morally. Officers must demonstrate bravery on the battlefield and in their everyday decisions. Embracing courage allows us to face challenges head-on and stand up for our beliefs, even in difficult circumstances.
3. Commitment: Commitment signifies an unwavering dedication to duty and excellence. Marine Corps officers are committed to their mission, comrades, and country. This dedication inspires us to pursue our goals with tenacity and fulfill our responsibilities with the highest standards of professionalism.

Marine Corps Codes of Conduct

The Marine Corps adheres to a strict code of conduct, ensuring that all actions align with its core values. Key aspects include:

• Respect for Authority: Marines understand and respect the chain of command. This principle teaches the importance of organizational structure and clear communication. In our lives, respecting authority and maintaining proper communication fosters harmony and efficiency.
• Duty and Responsibility: Marine officers are expected to perform their duties professionally. Adopting this mindset in our personal and professional activities ensures we approach our tasks with diligence and accountability.
• Integrity: Marines are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity, both on and off duty. This includes being honest and maintaining strong moral principles. We build trust and respect in our relationships and communities by practicing integrity.

Motto: Semper Fidelis

"Semper Fidelis," meaning "Always Faithful," is more than a motto for the Marine Corps; it is a way of life. It signifies unwavering loyalty to the mission, fellow Marines, and the nation. Embracing "Semper Fidelis" means being reliable and loyal in all our relationships and commitments, fostering trust and unity.

Leadership Qualities of Marine Corps Officers

1. Vision: Marine officers clearly envision their goals and inspire others to work towards them. This involves strategic thinking and the ability to foresee challenges and opportunities. Having a vision helps us set and achieve meaningful goals in our lives.
2. Empathy: Understanding and caring for the well-being of others is a crucial leadership trait in the Marine Corps. Empathy builds strong, cohesive teams and creates a supportive environment. By practicing empathy, we can foster collaboration and support those around us.
3. Decisiveness: Marine officers are trained to make timely and well-informed decisions, which is crucial in high-stakes situations. This quality helps maintain direction and momentum. Being decisive in our lives enables us to navigate challenges effectively and focus on our objectives.
4. Communication: Effective communication is vital for Marine Corps leadership. It ensures that goals, expectations, and feedback are clearly conveyed. Good leaders are also good listeners, valuing the input and concerns of their team members. In our lives, strong communication skills enhance our ability to connect with others and work collaboratively.

Conclusion

The values, codes, mottos, and leadership qualities that define Marine Corps officers are essential for military success and offer profound lessons for all of us. By embracing the core values of honor, courage, and commitment and living by the code of "Semper Fidelis," we can cultivate integrity, loyalty, and excellence in every aspect of our lives. Let us all strive to embody the principles of the Marine Corps and lead with honor and dedication.

 

THE PERNICIOUS ELECTORAL COLLEGE MUST BE ELIMINATED

The Pernicious Electoral College: A Tool for Undermining Democracy

The Electoral College is one of the most contentious features of the American political system. Its origins trace back to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, where the Founding Fathers debated how to elect the President of the United States best. While some delegates favored direct popular vote, others feared that a pure democracy could lead to the tyranny of the majority. Thus, the Electoral College was conceived as a compromise—a system designed to balance the influence of populous and less populous states and to provide a buffer against the potential dangers of direct democracy.

Historical Context and Purpose

The Electoral College was included in the Constitution for several key reasons:

1. Compromise between Large and Small States: Smaller states were concerned that larger states would overshadow their interests if the President were elected by direct popular vote. The Electoral College system gives smaller states a slightly disproportionate influence by providing each state the number of electors equal to its total number of Senators and Representatives in Congress.
2. Concerns about Direct Democracy: The Founding Fathers were wary of direct democracy, fearing that the general populace might not be well-informed enough to make sound decisions. They believed that an intermediary body of electors would be better equipped to choose a suitable candidate for the presidency.
3. Protection against Regional Candidates: The Electoral College was intended to ensure that presidential candidates had to gain broad support across the country rather than focusing solely on the most populous regions.
4. Slave States’ Influence: Another less noble reason was the protection of the interests of slave-holding states. The infamous Three-Fifths Compromise allowed states to count slaves as three-fifths of a person to apportion representation and electors, giving Southern states more political power than if only the free population were counted.

The Electoral College in Practice

While the Electoral College may have been conceived with some legitimate concerns, its application over the centuries has revealed significant flaws. The system has led to several instances where the candidate who won the popular vote did not become President, most notably in the elections of 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016. These outcomes have sparked debates about the fairness and democratic nature of the Electoral College.

The Threat to Democracy

Recently, the Electoral College has been criticized as a tool that can be exploited to undermine democratic principles. Here are some ways in which it poses a threat:

1. Disproportionate Influence: States with smaller populations disproportionately influence presidential elections. For example, a voter in Wyoming significantly impacts the outcome more than a voter in California. This undermines the principle of "one person, one vote."
2. Swing State Focus: Presidential campaigns tend to focus disproportionately on so-called "swing states"—states that could reasonably be won by either major party. This means that voters in non-swing states often feel ignored and disenfranchised.
3. Potential for Manipulation: Most states' winner-takes-all approach can lead to significant disparities between the popular vote and the electoral vote. Gerrymandering and other tactics can manipulate this system to skew results in favor of one party.
4. Erosion of Democratic Norms: The Electoral College can be exploited to entrench minority rule. When the system enables a candidate who did not win the popular vote to assume the presidency, it raises questions about the legitimacy of the electoral process and can erode trust in democratic institutions.

Toward a More Democratic System

The Electoral College, designed in an era vastly different from our own, increasingly appears anachronistic. To safeguard democracy, it is imperative to consider reforms that reflect contemporary values and realities. Proposals include moving to a direct popular vote for the presidency, implementing ranked-choice voting, or distributing electoral votes proportionally based on the popular vote within each state.

Reforming or abolishing the Electoral College would not be easy, requiring a constitutional amendment or significant legislative changes at the state level. However, to preserve and strengthen democracy, it is essential to address how this system can be used to subvert the will of the people and pave the way for undemocratic regimes.

In conclusion, while originally intended to balance interests and prevent rash decisions, the Electoral College has become a contentious and problematic feature of American democracy. It is crucial to re-examine this institution and strive for an electoral system reflecting the democratic ideals upon which the nation was founded.

Top of Form

 

CONVENING A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION

 Convening a Constitutional Convention to Rewrite the Constitution

The idea of convening a constitutional convention to rewrite the United States Constitution is a significant and complex undertaking. Such an event would be historic, echoing the original Constitutional Convention of 1787 that led to the creation of the current Constitution. Here's a detailed look at what would need to be done to convene a constitutional convention.

Constitutional Basis and Legal Framework

Article V of the Constitution

The process for amending the Constitution, including convening a constitutional convention, is outlined in Article V of the Constitution. There are two primary methods for proposing amendments:

1. Congressional Proposal: Congress can propose amendments by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
2. Convention of States: Alternatively, a constitutional convention can be convened if two-thirds (34 out of 50) of the state legislatures call for such a convention.

State Legislature Applications

The first step in convening a constitutional convention involves state legislatures. Each state must pass a resolution or application calling for a convention. These applications are submitted to Congress, which has the responsibility of tallying the applications.

Congressional Duties

Once 34 states have submitted their applications, Congress is constitutionally obligated to call a convention. The specific procedures for this are not detailed in the Constitution, leading to potential questions and challenges regarding the convention's organization, delegate selection, and scope of authority.

Organizing the Convention

Delegate Selection

Each state would need to decide how to select its delegates to the convention. This process could vary widely, with some states opting for elections while others might appoint delegates through their legislatures. The number of delegates each state would send and how they would vote (one state, one vote, or proportional representation) would need to be determined.

Setting the Agenda

One of the most critical aspects of organizing a constitutional convention is setting the agenda. While the applications from the states might specify certain topics or issues to address, the convention itself would have the authority to determine its agenda. This has led to concerns about a "runaway convention" that could propose far-reaching changes beyond the initial scope.

Rules and Procedures

Establishing the rules and procedures for the convention would be essential. This includes deciding on the leadership structure, voting procedures, and how to manage debates and proposals. These rules would significantly impact the convention's operation and the nature of the proposed amendments.

Proposing and Ratifying Amendments

Drafting Amendments

Once convened, the convention would draft proposed amendments. These could range from minor changes to a complete overhaul of the Constitution. Each proposed amendment would require approval by a majority of the delegates at the convention.

Ratification Process

Proposed amendments from the convention would then be sent to the states for ratification. Article V specifies that amendments must be ratified by either:

1. Three-fourths of the State Legislatures: This requires 38 out of 50 states to approve the amendments.
2. State Ratifying Conventions: Congress can specify that special conventions in each state ratify the amendments. This method was used for the 21st Amendment, which repealed Prohibition.

Challenges and Considerations

Political and Legal Challenges

Convening a constitutional convention presents numerous political and legal challenges. The lack of detailed procedures in Article V means that many aspects would need to be resolved through political negotiations and potentially judicial rulings.

Public Opinion and Political Climate

The success of a constitutional convention would heavily depend on public opinion and the political climate. Broad public support would be necessary to persuade state legislatures to call for a convention and later to ratify any proposed amendments.

Potential for a "Runaway Convention"

One of the biggest concerns is the possibility of a "runaway convention" that exceeds its original mandate. While some argue that a convention could be limited to specific topics, others fear it could propose sweeping changes to fundamental aspects of the Constitution.

Conclusion

Convening a constitutional convention to rewrite the Constitution is a momentous and challenging process. It requires significant coordination among state legislatures, careful planning, and a strong consensus on the issues to be addressed. While the idea of a convention evokes the spirit of the Founding Fathers, the practical and political challenges involved ensure that such an event would be contentious and complex. Nonetheless, it remains a constitutionally sanctioned method for addressing the nation's most pressing issues and ensuring that the Constitution evolves with the times.