WHO AM I?

Who Am I? A Reflection on a Life Well Spent

I am a Marine. That identity is indelibly etched into my soul. Once a Marine, always a Marine—the leadership, moral, and character principles I learned in the Corps form the foundation of who I am. It is a code that demands discipline, integrity, and honor. Yet, paradoxically, it has instilled in me a disdain for anything superficial or pretentious. This disposition makes me "not like green," perhaps a nod to the true meaning of service over show.

I am a lawyer. My passion for the law is boundless. I revere the intricate justice system and cherish the endless pursuit of knowledge that law demands. I have dedicated my life to practicing it with precision, empathy, and integrity. Yet, I observe with regret the moral lapses of the Supreme Court and the universal greed and failure of empathy among many of my peers. The law, as it was intended, is a noble calling; its practitioners should rise above mere self-interest.

I am a philosopher. To me, the unexamined life is not worth living. I have spent my years examining my own life and the lives of those around me, grappling with the great questions of existence. I have sought to understand morality, purpose, and the essence of truth. Philosophy is not just an abstract discipline—it is a way of life, a relentless commitment to seeking clarity and embracing the absurdity of life’s fleeting nursery rhyme.

I am a writer. Words are my craft, my sanctuary, and my means of expression. As a journeyman, writer, and poet, I have poured my heart into every line, finding both solace and purpose in the process. My first book, Absurd Clarity: A Fleeting Nursery Rhyme of Life, is a testament to this journey—a chronicle of critical thinking, an invitation to explore existential truths, and a celebration of a life well-lived. And though it is my first, it will not be my last.

I am a father, grandfather, and great-grandfather. In this role, I have fallen short of the hands-on nurturing I might have provided, yet I am immensely proud of my progeny. They are exceptional individuals, shining examples of resilience and character. In them, I see the legacy of my influence, however imperfect it may have been.

Most of all, I am a man who takes pride in his moral code. I know that life is fleeting and that I will not be remembered in history’s annals. But that is not what matters. What matters is that I have lived a life of integrity, sought to improve, and influenced others, however subtly, for the better.

Reflecting on this journey, I feel no regret—only a quiet satisfaction in a well-spent life. Mortality does not frighten me; instead, it drives me to cherish the moments I have and leave behind a legacy not of fame but of thought, care, and truth. For that, I am grateful. For that, I am content.

William James Spriggs

  

WHY I AM NOT A CHRISTIAN, REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT

Why I Am Not a Christian, Republican, or Democrat

In a world where labels often define our identity, I reject many affiliations that shape others. My refusal to identify as a Christian, a Republican, or a Democrat, and my reluctance even as a capitalist and lawyer, stems from a deep commitment to facts, rational thought, and a moral vision for society. Let me explain.

Why I Am Not a Christian

I cannot align myself with Christianity because I prioritize fact over fiction, reality over superstition, and proof over faith. By its nature, faith demands belief without evidence, an expectation I cannot reconcile with a rational worldview. I believe in the power of evidence to uncover truths, not in the suspension of reason to embrace unproven narratives.

The stories of Christianity, beautiful and poetic to some, lack the empirical foundation I require to shape my understanding of the universe. Relying on ancient texts to dictate morality or truth is troubling to me, especially when those texts conflict with the observable world. For me, a belief system must withstand the scrutiny of reason and align with the progress of science and human understanding. Christianity, as it is practiced today, often obstructs both.

Why I Am Not a Republican or Democrat

In my view, political parties in the United States have failed to lead rationally or guide the nation in the right direction. The Republican Party has increasingly devolved into a reactionary movement, embracing authoritarianism and rejecting the values of democracy. Its rhetoric and actions have often undermined the very principles on which this nation was founded.

The Democratic Party, while preferable in many respects, has also fallen short. It lacks bold leadership and vision and is often content with incrementalism when transformative action is required. In its hesitance, it has left a void, a vacuum of authentic leadership, eagerly filled by those who seek to exploit fear and division for personal power. Both parties have disappointed us who seek rational, ethical governance rooted in long-term planning and collective good.

Why I Am a Reluctant Capitalist

Though I operate within a capitalist system, I do so reluctantly. I recognize capitalism’s efficiency in innovation and wealth generation but its glaring inequities and destructive tendencies. Greed, not empathy, drives the system. Wealth consolidates in the hands of a few while vast swaths of humanity suffer in poverty.

I long for a shift toward socialism's principles, not to replace capitalism entirely but to temper its excesses. Socialism embodies the values of shared responsibility, equity, and care for the collective well-being. The military, often touted as a bastion of American excellence, operates on many socialist principles: universal healthcare, housing, and a commitment to mutual aid. These are the values we should aspire to in broader society.

Why I Am Embarrassed as a Lawyer

I love the law, but the state of the legal profession deeply disheartens me. Lawyers and judges entrusted with upholding justice have too often become agents of inequality and corruption. The monumental failings of the judiciary, from partisan rulings to outright disregard for ethical principles, have eroded public trust.

Law practitioners frequently prioritize profit over principle, perpetuating a system that serves the powerful at the expense of the vulnerable. This is not the justice I was taught to revere. It is a betrayal of the law’s highest purpose: to protect the rights of all and ensure fairness in society.

Conclusion: A Call for Rationality and Moral Leadership

I reject Christianity, the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, and unbridled capitalism not out of cynicism but out of hope for something better. I believe in the potential of humanity to rise above superstition, greed, and division. I yearn for leadership rooted in reason, morality, and a commitment to collective progress.

It is not enough to accept the status quo. We must demand better from our institutions, our leaders, and ourselves. Only then can we build a society that reflects the values of truth, justice, and empathy that I hold dear. Let us not settle for fiction when facts are within reach, nor for mediocrity when greatness is possible.

 William James Spriggs

SAGE ADVICE TO THE DEMOCRATS

Reconnecting With the Forgotten Majority: The Democrats’ Path Forward

The Democrats' struggle to connect with noncollege voters underscores a growing divide in American politics. Education has become the defining fault line, splitting cultural and political allegiances and dictating economic power. This gap, which emerged gradually over decades, now presents both a challenge and an opportunity for the Democratic Party to redefine its priorities and reconnect with a significant segment of the electorate.

Understanding the Divide

Over the years, Americans with college and graduate degrees have shifted overwhelmingly toward the Democratic Party, while those without such degrees have trended Republican. This divide reflects broader economic and cultural disparities. Educated Americans earn more and spend more—especially in areas like education, charity, and reading—giving them outsized influence over cultural and political institutions. By contrast, less-educated Americans, often excluded from these spheres of influence, have turned to political force as their primary means of asserting themselves.

This reliance on political power explains the populist appeal of candidates like Donald Trump. For many noncollege voters, tearing down elite institutions that seem unresponsive or dismissive of their values has become the only viable path to reclaim influence.

The Populist Appeal

Research highlights that support for populist economic policies—such as job guarantees, higher minimum wages, and strong unions—has remained steady among less-educated Americans. These policies resonate with voters who feel left behind by globalization and economic inequality. Yet, the Democratic Party's shift from New Deal-style populism to redistributive economic policies—where government allocates resources through taxes and benefits—has alienated many of these voters.

Before the Trump era, this shift had already driven a wedge between Democrats and hardworking, higher-earning noncollege Americans who believed in earning their way into the middle class. The focus on culture-war issues, exacerbated by the party’s increasing reliance on high-donation, high-education voters, only deepened this divide.

Examples of Democratic Populist Winners

Democrats have a rich history of winning elections by championing populist ideals that resonate with working Americans:

1. Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR)
   FDR's New Deal coalition, built during the Great Depression, is a hallmark of Democratic populism. His policies focused on job creation, social security, and labor protections, bringing together farmers, urban workers, and the unemployed under a shared vision of economic recovery and fairness.
2. Harry S. Truman
   Truman's "Fair Deal" expanded upon FDR's New Deal, emphasizing civil rights, healthcare, and housing for all Americans. His no-nonsense, plain-spoken style appealed to working-class voters across the country.
3. Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ)
   While controversial for his Vietnam War policies, LBJ's Great Society programs—including Medicare, Medicaid, and the War on Poverty—embodied populist ideals that improved the lives of millions of Americans, particularly those in disadvantaged communities.
4. Barack Obama
   Although often associated with educated elites, Obama's 2008 campaign energized a broad coalition of working-class voters with his promises of healthcare reform, economic recovery, and hope for all Americans following the Great Recession.

Populist Candidates for the Future

The Democratic Party's future depends on finding leaders who embody economic fairness and cultural inclusion while connecting with working-class voters. Potential candidates or archetypes for this movement include:

1. Senator Sherrod Brown (Ohio)
   Brown is a steadfast champion of labor rights and fair trade policies, known for his ability to connect with both rural and urban voters in a key swing state. His track record of advocating for working families makes him a natural choice for a populist platform.
2. Governor Andy Beshear (Kentucky)
   Beshear’s recent victory in a deep-red state highlights his ability to focus on kitchen-table issues like healthcare and education while avoiding polarizing culture wars. His success demonstrates how a unifying, populist message can resonate across party lines.
3. Senator John Fetterman (Pennsylvania)
   Fetterman’s blue-collar background and unapologetically progressive economic policies have helped him win over noncollege voters in a battleground state. His authentic demeanor and focus on worker issues make him a natural fit for a populist Democratic platform.
4. Stacey Abrams (Georgia)
   While Abrams is often associated with voter rights, her focus on economic justice and healthcare access positions her as a potential populist leader. Her ability to mobilize grassroots support could help redefine the Democratic base.
5. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (New York)
   Although divisive, AOC’s advocacy for progressive economic policies such as Medicare for All and the Green New Deal resonates with younger and working-class voters who feel disenfranchised by the current system.

The Path to Reconnection

To bridge the divide, Democrats must return to their populist roots and prioritize policies that directly benefit workers. Candidates who champion job creation, labor rights, and equitable trade policies can appeal to voters who feel neglected by the current economic order. Moreover, Democrats must address the cultural alienation felt by many noncollege voters. This requires genuine listening to their concerns, recognizing their contributions, and rebuilding trust in the party's commitment to their well-being.

A Winning Strategy

The educational and cultural divide in American politics is not insurmountable. By focusing on inclusive economic policies and fielding candidates who understand the struggles of everyday Americans, the Democratic Party can expand its appeal without sacrificing its core values. Reconnecting with the noncollege majority is not just a political imperative but a moral one, reflecting the party's foundational commitment to equality and opportunity for all.

A return to populism—centered on fairness, dignity, and shared prosperity—could be the key to revitalizing the party and restoring faith in the democratic process. By looking at both historical successes and emerging leaders, Democrats have a clear path to bridging the educational divide and rebuilding a coalition that genuinely represents all Americans.

William James Spriggs

FRAGILE TOWERS CRUMBLE

How Fragile Towers Crumble

Players believe they hold the winning hand in the great game of cards. But what if one of them starts to hear whispers? Whispers of an invisible ace held by an unseen opponent—an ace that could tip the game entirely. Suddenly, the confidence fades, and the player begins to second-guess every move. Once tall and defiant, the house of cards starts to sway, not from external gusts but from the tremors of its builder's doubt.

The Invisible Ace isn’t honest, of course. It’s a construct, an idea planted by clever opposition—an abstraction meant to highlight a truth: systems built on shaky foundations crumble under the weight of paranoia and fragility.

Consider, for instance, a particular leader who has built his empire atop a stack of narratives, bluffs, and fragile alliances. What if, somewhere in the corridors of his imagination, a whisper were to suggest a mole exists? A mole deep in the machinery, armed not with explosives but with a simple needle to pop the balloon of certainty. Would his empire hold steady, or would he dismantle it brick by paranoid brick?

Such a tactic, though delightfully satirical to imagine, speaks volumes about the structural integrity of his fortress. Strong towers withstand hurricanes; weak ones fall when the builder pulls at the beams, searching for cracks. The point isn’t to advocate for invisible aces or fictitious moles—it’s to ask why some houses are so easily toppled by the mere idea of one.

In the broader game of governance and leadership, the loyal opposition doesn't need actual sabotage. The most damning revelations often come not from outside but from within. A structure reliant on loyalty alone, without trust or truth, is always a whisper away from collapse. And when loyalty is bought with fear or favor, it’s a currency depreciating faster than you can say "checkmate."

So here’s the lesson for all architects of power: Build with truth as your foundation, and no whisper of an invisible ace will ever keep you awake at night.

Bill Strong 

FINAL DISPATCH FROM THE TRENCHES OF CW II

Final Dispatch from Bill Strong, Reporting from the Trenches of Civil War II

This is Bill Strong, signing off for the last time. From the trenches of this conflict—though perhaps calling it a conflict is too generous, as it feels more like a rout—I deliver my final words, heavy with sorrow and disbelief. The delusionals, against all odds and reason, have claimed victory. The Rationales, to whom I have devoted my allegiance and pen, have been defeated, not by the strength of their enemies, but by their unwillingness to seize the decisive moment.

General Biden, the man we trusted to hold the line, has chosen not to act. He has refused to invoke the powers at his disposal, the powers of law, history, and justice, to declare Trump ineligible under the Constitution he swore to defend. Perhaps he believes in some greater strategy, or perhaps he is simply too bound by the chains of decorum and tradition to leap that history demands. Either way, his inaction now appears final, and the Rationales, my people, are left stranded, leaderless, and lost.

In January, Trump will stride into the halls of power, not as a president but as a conqueror. What remains of the United States—the ideals we cherished, the Constitution we revered—will crumble under his iron will. The land of the free and the home of the brave will be no more. We will become subjects, not citizens, under a regime built on lies and fueled by fear.

And what of us, the Rationales? What of those who clung to truth when it became unfashionable, who fought for reason when the world turned its back? Our options are grim. Some will flee to distant shores, seeking refuge where democracy still breathes freely. Others will try to hide, to survive under the oppressive shadow of the delusionals’ rule. And some—perhaps too many—will simply give in, adopting the salute and the slogans of the enemy just to get by.

As for me, I will fade away quietly and with dignity, I hope. This is not the world I fought for, nor is it one I can thrive in. I have no more words left to give, or battles left to fight. I leave that to the younger ones if they find it in themselves to resist when so much seems lost.

But before I go, let me say this: we Rationalists were not wrong. We believed in something real—something good. We stood for facts, science, and the power of empathy and reason. We fought for a nation where all could live with dignity and fairness. We fought for the America we were taught to believe in. America is gone now, but that does not mean we were wrong to fight for it.

This is Bill Strong, signing off for the last time. I will retreat into the quiet, into whatever future remains for those who once dared to hope. But I will carry the knowledge that we stood for what was right, even as the world crumbled around us.

May history remember us kindly. May the Rationales’ dream of a better world find life again in some distant tomorrow.

Goodbye, and good luck.

—Bill Strong

  

REPORT FROM THE TRENCHES 2

Bill Strong Report: From the Trenches 

Date: November 18, 2024

The battleground of reason feels quiet—a stark and chilling silence. I report what can only be called a dire vacuum from the rural blue trenches of a state that has not yet forgotten its values. The Rationales, our loosely collected hope, remain leaderless, voiceless, and fractured. Standing at the crossroads of historic potential, Biden hesitates to declare Donald Trump ineligible—a bold action that history demands but present politics shuns.

Where are the Harrys, the Franklins, and the Johns of our time? Those who confronted tyranny not as a distant threat but as an immediate danger to the republic. Their courage has not passed to their successors. The Rationales today are mired in hesitation while the opposition—those whose platform is rooted in deception and division—marches forward with a precision that should terrify anyone paying attention.

The delusionals, as they rightly are, have laid out their strategy, a playbook of bait-and-switch. Trump, ever the showman, is poised to betray even his most loyal supporters. History has taught us that authoritarians require only tools for their rise, not companions for their reign. And yet, the Rationales remain silent.

No Plan, No Hope—Unless
From this disarray, a question arises: Are we journalists who must become the leaders? Corporate capitalists control the megaphones of our profession, but if we can wield them with conviction, perhaps we can ignite the spark of resistance. HL Mencken once told truths that shocked a nation into seeing its reflection. Where is that voice now? Who will step into the gap to rally the Rationales and make the case for rational governance and truth?

Trump’s strategy is painfully clear: seduce, betray, and consume. He has baited millions, but his ultimate move will be to abandon them for power's sake. The Rationales must seize this moment to reveal the emperor’s naked ambition.

Propaganda of Truth
We can start with the facts, the raw and unyielding truths that power cannot refute. Report on Trump’s disregard for those who believed in him. Show his betrayal of working families, the environment, and democracy itself. These stories are not ours to keep but to amplify. Let the Rationales hear their own voices in the echoes of our reporting.

This is the crossroads. A strategy waits to be forged, but it will not come from the current generation of leaders. It must come from the trenches—from us. If we wait for a rallying cry, it may come too late. We must write, report, and let it echo until it drowns out the lies.

The Rationales must rise—or we will fall.

 

  

REPORT FROM THE TRENCHES OF THE SECOND AMERICAN CIVIL WAR

Report from the Trenches: The Second American Civil War
By Bill Strong, War Correspondent

The High Ground Taken

The delusionals have secured the high ground, both figuratively and literally, in this escalating conflict between the forces of reason—the Rationales—and those driven by unyielding fervor and dangerous ideology. From this vantage point, the delusionals are fortifying their position, preparing to launch an aggressive assault against the Rationales below.

While steadfast in their commitment to truth and reason, the Rationales are disorganized and lack a unified command structure. Their leadership appears fragmented, with no clear strategy for reclaiming lost ground or neutralizing the enemy’s stronghold. The morale among the troops is shaky, as faith in their leaders begins to waver.

The Delusional War Machine

The delusionals have proven cunning and ruthless in their preparations. They have appointed a cadre of generals and senior officers, many of whom are untested, inexperienced, and radically extreme in their ideologies. These leaders, driven by zealous ambition, have issued chilling proclamations: prisoners will not only be taken but will face annihilation or exile to distant lands—a horrifying promise of cruelty that reveals the delusionals' utter disdain for the rules of engagement or human dignity.

Their propaganda machine is relentless, spewing rhetoric that stokes fear and division, further fueling their troops with a sense of divine or ideological mission. From their high ground, they rain down psychological warfare, aimed at breaking the Rationales’ resolve.

The Rationales in Disarray

Meanwhile, on the Rationales’ side, the absence of a coherent battle plan is becoming a glaring vulnerability. Their leader, though capable and respected, has failed to seize critical opportunities to strike at the enemy’s weaknesses. The lack of decisive action has emboldened the delusionals, who now have the momentum and confidence to escalate their campaign.

In the trenches, Rationales’ soldiers—citizens from all walks of life—remain committed to the cause of truth, justice, and reason. But their courage alone may not suffice without clear directives and a united front. Whispers of doubt ripple through the ranks as the delusionals’ next moves loom ominously on the horizon.

The Coming Battle

As I write this report, the air is thick with tension. Both sides are bracing for what seems inevitable—a full-scale battle that will determine the future of this fractured nation. Will the Rationales rally under inspired leadership, devise a strategy, and reclaim the high ground? Or will the delusionals press their advantage and impose their vision of tyranny unchecked?

The stakes are existential. This is not just a battle over territory but over the soul of a nation, over truth versus lies, reason versus delusion. I will continue to report from the trenches as events unfold, chronicling this historic and harrowing chapter of our shared history.

Stay strong, Rationales. The fight is far from over.

  

EXCEPTIONAL LEADERSHIP PRINCIPLES

The Principles of Exceptional Leadership: Lessons Rooted in Reality, Empathy, and Dedication

Leadership is an art and a science, demanding a unique blend of personal attributes and learned skills. Reflecting on my experiences as a U.S. Marine Corps officer, I recognize key principles that distinguish influential leaders. These principles are universal and essential for those who aspire to lead with integrity and purpose.

1. A Strong Moral Code Rooted in Reality

An effective leader’s moral compass must be grounded in reality, guided by rationality, not religious dogma. True morality arises from an innate sense of right and wrong, honed by experience and empathy. Leaders with an unwavering commitment to ethical behavior inspire trust and set the standard for their teams.

2. Empathy for Those You Lead

Empathy is the foundation of connection and trust between leaders and their teams. Understanding and valuing the experiences, needs, and concerns of those you lead fosters loyalty and ensures the group works cohesively toward shared goals. A leader who listens is a leader who understands.

3. The U.S. Marine Corps: The Ultimate Leadership Training

Having served as a Marine Corps officer, I can confidently say that the Marine Corps provides the most rigorous and effective leadership training. Its principles—dedication, discipline, and service—are unmatched. The Marine Corps develops leaders who are skilled and deeply committed to their teams and mission. Leaders shaped by Marine Corps training embody resilience, accountability, and selflessness.

4. Dedication to Country and Mission

Leadership demands an unwavering commitment to a cause greater than oneself. Whether the mission is national service, organizational goals, or community improvement, a leader must prioritize the collective good over personal ambition. This dedication inspires teams to do the same.

5. Lead from the Front

A true leader leads by example. As General Dwight D. Eisenhower famously said, "You lead effectively by pulling on the string, not pushing it." Leadership is about being at the forefront—demonstrating courage, resilience, and a willingness to share in the challenges faced by the team. It’s about earning respect through action, not position.

6. Leaders Eat Last

The concept of "eating last" symbolizes a leader’s duty to prioritize the needs of their team. This principle is vital in all aspects of leadership, from ensuring resources are allocated fairly to fostering an environment where team members feel valued and supported.

7. Be Accessible, Transparent, and a Strong Communicator

Availability and transparency are non-negotiable. A leader must be approachable, fostering open dialogue and trust. Clear, effective communication is equally essential—strong diction, proper use of language, and clarity of expression enable leaders to articulate vision, delegate tasks, and inspire their teams.

8. Be a Team Player, Not a Lone Ranger

Leadership is a team effort. Leaders must align themselves with their team and the institution they serve, embodying the same standards they expect of others. This principle fosters unity and demonstrates respect for the collective mission. For example, maintaining a uniform haircut in the Marine Corps symbolizes adherence to shared standards—a simple yet powerful act of solidarity.

9. Cultivate a Culture of Service and Dedication

Exceptional leaders dedicate themselves fully to their role and to those they lead. They embrace responsibility, embody humility, and prioritize the welfare of their team. Leadership is not about command and control but service and support.

Leadership Principles and the Presidency

All leadership principles outlined above apply with equal force and effect to the office of President of the United States. However, the presidency demands additional attributes to navigate this role's unique challenges.

Conflict Experience and Proven Competency

The President must have firsthand experience navigating conflict and demonstrating competence under pressure. These qualities are critical for making sound decisions during crises, managing diverse and competing interests, and maintaining stability in adversity. Leadership at this level requires a proven track record of successfully handling complex challenges.

Servant of a Diverse Population

The President is the leader and servant of a diverse and multifaceted population. This role necessitates adaptability, integrity, and a deep commitment to equitably addressing all citizens' personal and collective needs. The President must embody fairness, ensuring everyone receives equal consideration and respect regardless of background.

Reforming the Path to Leadership

To uphold these high standards, our Constitution must be amended—or rewritten—to establish formal qualifications for the presidency. The principles of leadership described here should form the foundation of these requirements. Just as Marine Corps generals rise through a rigorous process of leadership progression, those aspiring to the presidency must demonstrate their mettle through a similar journey of tested and proven leadership. Only by earning this position through service, competence, and character should one be considered worthy of the highest office in the land.

Conclusion: The Call to Leadership

Leadership is a profound responsibility that demands integrity, empathy, and unwavering commitment. While the Marine Corps provides an unparalleled foundation, these principles apply to leaders in all walks of life. Whether you’re leading a military unit, a corporation, or a community group, embodying these attributes will inspire trust, drive success, and leave a lasting legacy.

As we look to the future, let us demand leaders who lead with purpose, dedication, and selflessness—leaders who inspire us to be our best selves.

William James Spriggs

  

REJECTING THE SPIRITUALITY DELUSION

The Illusory Nature of Spirituality: A Critique for All Aspects of Life

Spirituality is often celebrated as a deeply personal journey of meaning, connection, and self-discovery. Yet, beneath its appealing façade lies an amorphous, intellectually dishonest construct that frequently operates as a euphemism for religion. Its reliance on unsubstantiated claims and subjective experiences makes it unsuitable for the workplace and undermines its legitimacy in all areas of life.

Spirituality as a Repackaged Religion

Although proponents argue that spirituality is distinct from religion, it often draws heavily from religious ideologies while avoiding the scrutiny religion faces. By couching itself in terms like "energy," "higher consciousness," or "universal connection," spirituality sidesteps the need to provide evidence, presenting itself as an acceptable alternative to structured belief systems. However, this rhetorical sleight of hand cannot conceal its reliance on unprovable and inherently subjective claims.

The Intellectual Flaws of Spirituality

At its core, spirituality promotes beliefs that lack empirical grounding, substituting personal feelings for objective truth. This approach perpetuates intellectual dishonesty by conflating subjective experiences with universal meaning. Reliance on spirituality encourages magical thinking, sidesteps reason, and undermines the pursuit of factual understanding in all aspects of life.

Examples include the embrace of pseudoscientific practices such as crystal healing, energy work, or astrology—all of which lack scientific support but are often legitimized under the umbrella of spirituality. By perpetuating these ideas, spirituality fosters a culture of superstition rather than enlightenment.

Why Spirituality Should Be Rejected Universally

The spirituality issues extend far beyond the workplace, affecting individual and collective decision-making, relationships, education, and societal progress. Here’s why its influence is detrimental across all domains:

• Undermines Rationality: In personal and societal contexts, decisions based on spiritual notions often conflict with evidence-based reasoning, leading to poor outcomes.
• Encourages Divisiveness: Spiritual beliefs, despite claims of inclusivity, are often rooted in specific cultural or religious traditions. This creates a veneer of universality while marginalizing those who do not share such views.
• Stalls Progress: Adopting spiritual explanations for life's challenges detracts from seeking solutions grounded in science, reason, and critical analysis.
• Fosters Complacency: Spirituality often emphasizes acceptance and internal peace, which can discourage meaningful action to address pressing issues in favor of passive contemplation.

A Call for Secular, Evidence-Based Living

Individuals and societies should prioritize reason, critical thinking, and evidence-based understanding to live meaningful, informed, and effective lives. Personal fulfillment can be achieved through pursuing knowledge, engagement with reality, and ethical frameworks rooted in shared human values rather than metaphysical conjecture. Likewise, societal progress depends on confronting challenges with logic and science, not retreating into spiritual abstractions.

Rejecting the Illusion

While superficially comforting, spirituality fails to provide the intellectual or practical tools necessary for navigating life effectively. Its reliance on unverifiable claims and subjective interpretations offers neither clarity nor progress. By rejecting spirituality and its associated superstitions, individuals and societies can embrace a commitment to truth, logic, and genuine understanding—principles essential for flourishing in every facet of existence.

William James Spriggs

 

SO YOU PREFER TO BE A SLAVE?

AND RESIDE IN THE CELESTIAL NORTH KOREA?

The Rise of Authoritarianism in America: A Union of Politics and Fundamentalism

In recent years, a significant shift has occurred in American politics—one that aligns a growing number of voters with authoritarian governance, often cloaked in the guise of religious righteousness. This phenomenon is rooted in the expansion of fundamentalist religious movements, particularly evangelical Christianity, which has embraced political agendas advocating for centralized power and the erosion of pluralistic democratic ideals.

The fusion of these religious and political ideologies has not only reshaped the electorate. Still, it has sown the seeds for an alarming trend: a collective yearning for authoritarian rule masked as moral governance and a troubling abdication of individual liberty.

A Shift Toward Authoritarianism

At its core, democracy demands a balance between individual freedoms and collective responsibilities. However, the recent embrace of authoritarian tendencies departs from these principles. Many Americans have rallied behind leaders who promise strong-handed governance, appealing to a desire for order, simplicity, and moral clarity in a rapidly changing world.

Fundamentalist religious ideologies, which emphasize submission to a higher power and strict adherence to prescribed moral codes, align naturally with authoritarian systems. These movements often portray society as needing salvation from moral decay, positioning strong leaders as divinely appointed stewards to enforce their vision of righteousness.

The language of absolute authority—a hallmark of both fundamentalist religion and authoritarianism—has gained traction among voters, who increasingly view democracy’s messiness and complexity as burdensome. This has led to a political environment where liberty and self-governance are exchanged for the perceived security of centralized control.

The Appeal of Totalitarian Governance

For some, the appeal of an authoritarian government lies in its promise of structure and accountability. Much like religious doctrines that demand unwavering faith and obedience, authoritarianism offers a black-and-white worldview where the "good" are rewarded, and the "wicked" are punished. It resonates with those who seek a moral compass that dictates right and wrong without ambiguity.

This phenomenon can be described as a desire for servitude—a yearning to be guided by an omnipotent authority that promises protection and purpose. In aligning political choices with this mindset, voters unwittingly relinquish their autonomy and democratic freedoms, believing that a watchful, omnipresent leader will deliver them from societal chaos.

The Dangerous Union of Church and State

The merger of political power with religious fundamentalism exacerbates the threat to democracy. When political leaders invoke divine authority to justify their actions, they blur the lines between governance and dogma. Policies grounded in religious absolutism can marginalize dissenting voices, erode minority rights, and foster an environment where questioning authority is equated with questioning faith.

This union is particularly dangerous in a society as diverse as America’s, where democracy relies on the coexistence of varied beliefs and perspectives. The imposition of a singular moral vision undermines the foundational principles of equality and freedom that democracy seeks to uphold.

A Call for Awareness and Resistance

To counteract this trend, it is essential to reassert the values of democracy: individual liberty, critical thinking, and mutual respect. Civic education must emphasize the importance of maintaining a secular state and protecting the separation of church and state. Citizens need to recognize the dangers of conflating spiritual salvation with political authority and understand the long-term consequences of endorsing leaders who prioritize control over freedom.

Religious institutions, too, bear a responsibility. While faith can be a source of personal strength and community, it must not be wielded as a tool to impose authoritarian ideologies on society. Leaders within these communities should champion the coexistence of diverse beliefs and advocate for governance that respects individual freedoms.

The Fight for Freedom

The current trajectory is not irreversible. History has shown that democratic principles can prevail even in the face of authoritarianism if citizens remain vigilant and engaged. The fight for freedom requires an informed and active electorate that values autonomy over submission and pluralism over homogeneity.

America stands at a crossroads. The question is not merely one of political preference but of the very nature of governance and liberty. Will we embrace the complexity and challenges of democracy, or will we yield to the seductive simplicity of authoritarian rule? The answer lies in our collective actions and commitment to the principles that have long defined the nation.

William James Spriggs

LITTLE DID THEY KNOW . . .

WHAT THEIR VOTE MEANT.

The Silent Implications of Project 2025: Why Civic Awareness is More Critical Than Ever

In the wake of the recent election, a troubling trend has emerged: many voters seemed unaware of the implications of the policy frameworks proposed by initiatives like Project 2025, spearheaded by groups such as the Heritage Foundation. This initiative, which outlines a far-reaching reconfiguration of the federal government, raises concerns about a potential transition to an oligarchic or theocratic governance structure. The failure to grasp these implications is symptomatic of a more significant issue: a widespread disengagement from the civic responsibility to understand and evaluate the forces shaping our democracy.

The Gap in Awareness

Project 2025 represents a detailed plan to reshape American governance, prioritizing executive power and enacting a conservative agenda across social, economic, and cultural spheres. Yet, its implications remain opaque to much of the electorate. Many voters appeared to cast their ballots without a complete understanding of what this initiative could mean for their future, whether due to intentional obfuscation, the complexity of the proposals, or the distractions of daily life.

This lack of awareness is not merely an oversight but a symptom of a deeper issue. Civic education, the cornerstone of informed citizenship, has eroded over decades. Voters often lack the tools or knowledge to dissect policies, critically evaluate political movements, or anticipate their long-term effects on governance and society.

The Responsibility of Citizenship

Democracy thrives on an informed electorate. The ability to engage thoughtfully with political processes, assess candidates' platforms, and understand the implications of policy proposals is fundamental. When citizens fail to exercise this responsibility, the door opens for ideologically driven agendas to gain traction without sufficient scrutiny.

In the case of Project 2025, its comprehensive nature demands close examination. Proposals to centralize power within the executive branch, reduce the influence of independent agencies, and reshape federal policy on issues from education to climate change are not merely administrative tweaks—they signal a potential departure from the checks and balances integral to American democracy.

The Role of Education and Media

To counteract this trend, greater emphasis must be placed on civic education and media literacy. Schools, communities, and media organizations must prioritize fostering critical thinking and understanding governmental structures and processes. Civic engagement cannot be relegated to a single high school course; it must be a lifelong endeavor woven into the fabric of public discourse.

Media outlets are also responsible for presenting complex policy initiatives like Project 2025 in accessible terms, stripping away jargon to reveal their practical implications for everyday Americans. Beyond reporting on the “who” and “what” of political developments, journalists must delve into the “why” and “how,” bridging the gap between governance and the governed.

A Call to Action

Voters, particularly those who may have felt disconnected from the implications of their choices, must recognize the power of their voice and the weight of their decisions. Understanding the forces shaping governance is not just a privilege but a duty. This election should serve as a wake-up call for individuals and institutions that shape public understanding.

To preserve the principles of democracy, we must rekindle a culture of informed and active citizenship. Only through awareness, education, and engagement can we ensure policies and proposals, regardless of origin, reflect the will and well-being of the people they are meant to serve. The stakes are too high, and the time is now.

William James Spriggs

WHY BIDEN CAN DECLARE TRUMP INELIGIBLE

The Executive Authority to Enforce Constitutional Amendments: Why Biden Can Declare Trump Ineligible

The United States Constitution, with its amendments, serves as the supreme law of the land, guiding the functioning of our democracy and enforcing laws by the Executive Branch. Recently, debates have arisen regarding Donald Trump's eligibility to run for office, specifically under the disqualification clause of the 14th Amendment, Section 3. Critics argue that only Congress can act, pointing to the Supreme Court's opinion in the Colorado case. However, this perspective overlooks the fundamental role of the Executive Branch in enforcing constitutional amendments, including the 14th Amendment, as a matter of settled precedent.

The Role of the Executive Branch in Enforcing Constitutional Amendments

Under Article II, Section 3, the Constitution mandates the Executive Branch to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." This directive extends to all laws, including Constitutional amendments. When an amendment is ratified, it becomes part of the Constitution and is thus a law that the Executive Branch must enforce.

For example, historical enforcement of the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause by the Executive Branch is well documented. In landmark cases such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which ruled racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, it was the Executive's duty, often through federal orders and actions, to enforce desegregation against resistant states. This precedent establishes that the Executive Branch can and does enforce Constitutional amendments without requiring new legislation from Congress.

The Supreme Court’s Role and the Misinterpretation of the Colorado Case

Recent discussions around the Colorado case have suggested that only Congress can determine a candidate's eligibility under the disqualification clause of the 14th Amendment. This interpretation, however, misreads the broader principles established by precedent regarding the enforcement of Constitutional amendments. While the Supreme Court plays a crucial role in interpreting the Constitution, the Executive Branch enforces these interpretations as law.

For instance, in Cooper v. Aaron (1958), the Supreme Court made it clear that the Constitution and its amendments are binding on all branches of government, including the Executive branch. The Court stated that the Supreme Court's interpretations of the Constitution are the "supreme Law of the Land," and therefore, the Executive Branch is not only empowered but required to enforce these laws.

The Executive’s Enforcement of the 14th Amendment

The argument that President Biden would be overstepping his bounds by declaring Trump ineligible under the 14th Amendment ignores the Executive Branch's routine enforcement of this amendment. The 14th Amendment, particularly its equal protection and disqualification clauses, has been actively enforced through executive actions. For example, federal agencies and executive orders have been used to combat discrimination and uphold civil rights as mandated by the 14th Amendment.

The enforcement of the 14th Amendment is not dependent on Congressional action alone. It is within the President's authority to ensure that no individual who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States or given aid and comfort to its enemies holds office—a provision explicitly stated in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

Precedent and Stare Decisis

The principle of stare decisis, which dictates that courts should follow precedent, further supports enforcing the 14th Amendment by the Executive Branch. Precedent shows that once a constitutional provision is interpreted, it becomes binding on all branches of government, including the Executive. Cases such as Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) affirm the Executive's duty to execute the laws of the Constitution as interpreted (or by extension, misinterpreted) by the judiciary.

Conclusion

The notion that President Biden would act illegally by declaring Donald Trump ineligible to run for office under the 14th Amendment is fundamentally flawed. The Constitution and its amendments are the supreme law of the land, and the Executive Branch has a clear mandate to enforce them. Precedent supports the authority of the Executive Branch to act on the 14th Amendment without waiting for Congressional action. As history has shown, the Executive has the power—and the duty—to uphold the Constitution and protect the integrity of our democracy.

If Biden declared Trump ineligible based on the explicit stipulations of the 14th Amendment, it would not be an act of overreach but rather a legitimate exercise of the Executive’s constitutional authority. As citizens and stewards of democracy, we must understand and support the mechanisms safeguarding our nation’s principles, including enforcing all constitutional provisions by the Executive Branch.

William James Spriggs

 

BUILDING A BETTER FUTURE

The New American Resistance: Building a Blueprint for a Better Future

In the face of a fascist movement that has eroded the foundations of American democracy, it has become clear that there will be no return to the status quo. The Constitution, once a beacon of democratic ideals, has been weaponized against the very freedoms it was designed to protect. The task of the new American resistance movement is to preserve what remains and construct a future that ensures democracy cannot be so easily undermined again. Solidarity must be the cornerstone of this movement, but equally critical is the effort to rewrite the Constitution to reflect a modern, equitable, and just society.

A Constitution for the Future

The American resistance must recognize that the original Constitution, as brilliant as it was in its time, is not infallible. It must be modernized to address structural vulnerabilities exploited by anti-democratic forces. Here are the key areas of reform that should guide this effort:

1. Redistribution of Senate Representation: The Senate’s structure disproportionately favors less populated states, allowing a minority of the population to wield outsized power. Rebalancing representation or creating a more equitable system must be prioritized.
2. Abolishing the Electoral College: The Electoral College has repeatedly thwarted the majority's will. Its elimination would ensure that every vote counts equally in presidential elections, reinforcing the principle of one person, one vote.
3. Prohibiting Gerrymandering: Gerrymandering has corrupted representative democracy, enabling politicians to choose their voters instead of voters choosing their representatives. Establishing independent, nonpartisan commissions for redistricting is essential.
4. Enhancing Voting Rights: Voting must be a guaranteed, accessible right for all citizens. Measures such as automatic voter registration, universal mail-in voting, and robust protections against voter suppression must be enshrined in law.
5. Strengthening Individual Rights and Liberties: The Constitution should include explicit guarantees of privacy, bodily autonomy, and protection against discrimination based on gender, race, or sexual orientation.
6. Rewriting the Second Amendment: The Second Amendment’s vague language has led to an epidemic of gun violence. A reimagined provision should prioritize public safety while balancing individual freedoms.
7. Setting Qualifications for the Presidency: Minimum qualifications for presidential candidates must be established, such as prior government or leadership experience, psychological evaluations, and adherence to ethical standards.
8. Reforming the Supreme Court: Increasing the number of justices, imposing term limits, and requiring diversification of the Court would ensure that it reflects the nation’s diversity and values.

Organizing for Change

While these reforms are critical for the long-term future, the resistance's immediate goal must be peacefully dismantling the current regime. Organized efforts to expose corruption, mobilize voters, and challenge unconstitutional actions in court are vital. Building alliances across political, social, and economic lines will strengthen the movement’s ability to effect change.

Solidarity as the Guiding Principle

Solidarity will be the glue that holds the resistance together. It demands that Americans from all walks of life unite to restore and reimagine democracy. This means setting aside minor differences to focus on the larger mission.

A Call to Action

The road ahead will not be easy. Rewriting the Constitution is a monumental task, but it is necessary to secure a better future. The resistance must not shy away from bold action. The time for incremental change has passed; what is needed now is a transformative vision and unyielding resolve.

The resistance cannot afford to wait. It must simultaneously fight to preserve what remains of democracy and lay the groundwork for a new era. If we act with purpose and solidarity, America's future can still be one of hope, freedom, and equality.

William James Spriggs

WHERE DOES AMERICA GO FROM HERE?

Where Does America Go From Here?

The landscape of America has irrevocably changed. Recent years' outcomes, notably under the tumultuous influence of former President Trump, have left the nation fractured, disillusioned, and facing an uncertain future. The resilience of American democracy is being tested as never before, and regardless of what lies ahead, America as we once knew it will likely never be the same.

Trump’s approach to leadership has been marked by an intense reliance on loyalty over competence, a system that initially seemed powerful but is, in reality, riddled with weaknesses. This dependency on personal loyalty may become his undoing, as it leaves the stability of his influence at the mercy of the sycophants he has empowered. Such a leadership style creates a house of cards, and as the pressures mount, this structure is likely to waver. When his closest allies recognize his vulnerabilities, they may attempt to assert themselves, fracturing his loyalist base into rival fiefdoms. In this scenario, Trump could be forced into a position where he must exert harsher control over his inner circle—a scenario that is as unsustainable as it is dangerous.

Meanwhile, Democrats, recognizing the opportunity to rebuild a nation shaken by authoritarianism, would be wise to focus on a comprehensive vision for a new America. They are now positioned to propose radical but necessary reforms to mend the wounds inflicted on the nation’s spirit. The vision for a "New America" should start with a reimagined Constitution that is fortified to resist future autocratic threats and better equipped to serve a diverse and evolving society.

The principles upon which this reformed Constitution should rest would focus on creating a stronger foundation for democratic processes and individual rights, less vulnerable to the influence of charismatic authoritarian figures. This document would address the loopholes and weaknesses that allowed unchecked power to grow within the executive branch, preventing future leaders from exploiting their office for personal gain and ideological agendas. Issues like gerrymandering, voting rights, and political accountability would need careful recalibration to empower every citizen's voice, not just those in positions of wealth and privilege.

It’s not improbable that Trump’s eventual fall will come from within his party. Those in the Republican establishment who once supported him may realize that the chaos and unpredictability he brings serve neither their interests nor those of the nation. His agenda has alienated the general populace and divided the GOP into factions, leaving the party struggling to find a coherent identity beyond Trumpism. Some former loyalists may eventually turn against him, seeking to rebuild their political power by distancing themselves from his legacy.

In the meantime, the Democrats should start working on this transformative plan if they can muster the creative vision needed. With foresight, they can position themselves as the architects of a restored and improved republic. The goal would not be to restore America to what it once was but to adapt it to meet the demands and challenges of a new era.

This vision for a new America could pave the way for policies that reinforce democratic norms, protect against disinformation, and promote an inclusive economic model that uplifts all citizens rather than favoring a select few. The time for such a transformation has never been more urgent. It is up to those who can see beyond immediate power struggles to lay the groundwork for a society that learns from its past, addresses its current challenges, and prepares for a future where every citizen has a voice, a role, and a stake in the nation's continued progress.

Ultimately, America’s path forward depends on its leaders’ ability to move past division and authoritarianism. By reshaping its foundational principles, America has the chance to survive and thrive in a way that honors its ideals of freedom, justice, and equality.

William James Spriggs

 

RELIGION BREEDS UNRESTRAINED GREED

The Cultivation of Greed: How Religion Feeds Our Universal Hunger for More

Throughout history, religion has served as a moral compass, guiding individuals toward what is traditionally seen as virtuous behavior. Yet, as we look closer, we find a troubling irony: the very institution that promotes altruism and humility often operates on principles that inadvertently foster self-interest and, at times, unrestrained greed.

Belief systems that emphasize personal salvation, exclusive blessings, or promises of wealth have an unintended consequence: they shape individuals to prioritize their desires, framing self-interest in the context of divine purpose. When religion advocates personal prosperity as a reward for faith, it risks shifting focus from collective empathy to individual gain, undermining the values it purports to uphold.

The Personal God and the Primacy of Self

A critical element in this discussion is the concept of a "personal god"—a deity whose relationship with the individual is defined by reward, recognition, and unique privileges. This intimate deity fosters a belief in personal entitlement. If one views their relationship with God as special or uniquely deserving, it naturally elevates their sense of self-importance, subtly reinforcing narcissistic tendencies under the guise of religious devotion. This view often shifts priorities, nudging individuals toward actions that benefit themselves first and foremost, reducing empathy and widening social divides.

The inherent risk of this perspective is that it feeds a subtle, pervasive greed, where religious devotion becomes a means to fulfill personal wants rather than promote universal goodwill. In seeking individual salvation, believers are sometimes encouraged to turn inward, focusing less on collective empathy and more on ensuring their path to righteousness or reward.

Greed Under the Cloak of Faith

Greed is not limited to material wealth. It extends to influence, power, and social capital—desires that religious institutions often fulfill. Some faith communities explicitly or implicitly encourage followers to seek “prosperity” as evidence of divine favor, fostering a transactional relationship with the sacred. In this view, devotion equates to material blessing, leading individuals to gauge their spiritual success by worldly possessions and status. For the faithful, this pursuit of personal gain is often justified, even sanctified, as part of a divine plan, blurring the lines between selflessness and self-interest.

In many cases, this framework enables a system where individuals, convinced of their moral superiority, view their actions as sanctioned by a higher power, further justifying self-centered behaviors. Wealth and power are pursued not as corrupting influences but as rewards from above, leading many to conflate spiritual success with material success, fueling an already rampant culture of greed.

The Harmful Impact on Society

The cumulative effect of this approach is detrimental to society as a whole. By prioritizing personal gain under prosperity as a moral virtue, we may feel less responsible for supporting the religious justification; we lose sight of universal moral obligations, such as compassion, justice, and collective well-being. When personal salvation or prosperity is placed above empathy and social responsibility, society suffers.

This misalignment manifests in various social spheres, from economic inequities to political divides. Those who view their own prosperity as a moral virtue may feel less responsibility to support those less fortunate, assuming that wealth is a sign of divine favor or moral superiority. Consequently, systemic greed grows unchecked, defended by religious dogma that equates personal success with divine blessing.

Reclaiming Morality Beyond Religious Justification

To overcome this cycle, we must reconsider the principles we define morality. Morality, as an inherent part of our humanity, transcends religious boundaries. Genuine compassion, empathy, and ethical behavior do not require religious sanction—they are intrinsic to us as social beings. Moving beyond the notion that a personal god sanctions our actions can liberate individuals to seek fulfillment not in material gain but in the sense of shared humanity.

By recognizing that morality is embedded within us rather than imposed upon us, we allow a more authentic and inclusive sense of ethics to flourish—one that values empathy over entitlement, altruism over personal gain, and the common good over individual success.

In challenging this religiously sanctioned culture of greed, we can move toward a society that values integrity and compassion over material rewards. Our innate moral code, guided by our shared human experience, provides the foundation for a more equitable, empathetic world—one that does not require religious justification but is grounded in a universal commitment to each other.

Only by transcending the notion of divinely sanctioned greed can we hope to break free from its hold, nurturing instead a culture that prizes empathy, collective responsibility, and genuine virtue.

William James Spriggs

WE WILL NOT SURRENDER

Millions of Americans are in deep despair over the election results and the loss of their country and its values. Their fellow countrymen and women betrayed the principles the country proudly rested upon.

In times of darkness, our true strength is revealed. For every American who feels the weight of despair, know this: you are not alone. A single election or administration cannot erase the spirit of freedom, equality, and justice that built this country. These values are woven into our shared history and held in the hearts of millions.

We continue to offer hope.

The Supreme Court's directive for Congress to manage Trump's eligibility is, at best, a misinterpretation of the separation of powers and, at worst, a punt to stall accountability. Congress, as it currently stands, is hopelessly divided. With the House in disarray and Senate dynamics in flux, any effort to invoke Section 3 through congressional action would likely be marred by partisan divides, allowing the issue to stall indefinitely. In this climate, Congress is ill-equipped to ensure the amendment’s enforcement.

President Biden’s oath binds him to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." With this responsibility comes the duty to enforce the Constitution’s principles, including the 14th Amendment’s mandate that those who have sought to undermine or overthrow the government cannot hold public office. Trump’s actions during and after the January 6th insurrection meet this criterion. His attempt to overturn a democratic election was an act that sought to dismantle our government, fitting the definition of insurrection and directly contravening the 14th Amendment.

We will not surrender to fear or any threat against our Constitution and our democracy. This moment calls for courage, not retreat, conviction, or resignation. Remember, America was founded on the belief that power belongs to the people and that the government exists to serve its citizens, not to rule over them. We have inherited this legacy, and now we must protect it.

Take heart and stand together. We will organize, advocate, and persist with every tool. We will fight in our communities, in the courts, in every town hall, and through every platform we have. Every letter, every conversation, and every action taken to defend our democracy strengthens our resolve.

To those who are sickened, angry, and grieving—feel these emotions, but don’t let them consume you. Use them as fuel. This fight is long, but it’s one worth waging. Together, we can ensure that this chapter is remembered not for the erosion of American values but for the resilience of those who stood up to defend them. This is your country, our country, and no force can silence a unified demand for justice and freedom.

This is just the beginning, and every voice matters.

William James Spriggs

 

WHAT HAPPENED?

 

WHAT HAPPENED?

In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Kamala Harris received approximately 67 million votes, which is about 14 million fewer than the 81 million votes Joe Biden secured in 2020. This significant decrease can be attributed to several factors:

 

1. Voter Turnout Decline: The 2024 election experienced a notable drop in voter participation compared to 2020. The 2020 election saw the highest voter turnout since 1900, driven by heightened political engagement and the unique circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, 2024 did not witness similar levels of voter mobilization, leading to fewer votes overall.

2. Shifts in Voter Demographics: Certain demographic groups that strongly supported Biden in 2020 showed reduced enthusiasm or shifted their preferences in 2024. For instance, some suburban voters and independents who favored Biden may have been less motivated to vote or chose alternative candidates, impacting Harris's total vote count.

3. Third-Party and Independent Candidates: The presence of third-party and independent candidates in 2024 provided alternatives for voters dissatisfied with the major party nominees. This likely siphoned votes from both Harris and her main opponent, Donald Trump, contributing to the overall reduction in votes for the Democratic candidate.

4. Political Climate and Campaign Dynamics: The political environment in 2024 differed from that of 2020. Issues that galvanized voters in 2020, such as the pandemic response and economic recovery, were less central in 2024. Additionally, campaign strategies and voter outreach efforts may have varied in effectiveness, influencing voter turnout and preferences.

In summary, the decrease in votes for Kamala Harris compared to Joe Biden's 2020 total is primarily due to lower voter turnout, demographic shifts, the influence of third-party candidates, and changes in the political landscape. These factors collectively contributed to the 14 million vote difference observed between the two elections.

William James  Spriggs

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

 

NO CONGRESS, THIS IS BIDEN'S JOB

Why President Biden Must Declare Trump Ineligible for Office

The stakes could not be higher. As the 2024 election season accelerates, we face the real possibility of a return to a Trump presidency, a return that would pose an existential threat to American democracy. For those who believe in the rule of law, constitutional integrity, and the continuity of our democratic values, a crucial and urgent question emerges: Is there a lawful, immediate way to prevent this outcome?

I believe there is, and it’s time to call on President Biden to take decisive action by declaring Donald Trump ineligible for office, exercising executive power and enforcing the 14th Amendment’s Section 3, which bars individuals who have engaged in insurrection from holding office. Unfortunately, a recent Supreme Court decision has undermined this essential provision, dangerously shifting the responsibility to Congress, where it risks stagnation. Biden must use the authority vested in the executive branch to prevent the collapse of the rule of law under another Trump administration.

A Constitutional Duty

The Supreme Court’s recent decision to sidestep precedent and defer the enforcement of the 14th Amendment’s disqualification clause to Congress was not only disappointing—it was an evasion of responsibility. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is clear: those who have engaged in insurrection or given aid to those who have cannot hold public office. For decades, the executive branch has been tasked with enforcing the Constitution in myriad circumstances, whether in voting rights cases, civil rights protections, or national security threats. The Executive Branch does not require permission from Congress to fulfill its duty to uphold the Constitution, and it certainly does not need it here.

Yet the Court’s ruling ignored this robust precedent, undermining the separation of powers in favor of political gridlock. Congress, mired in partisanship and gridlock, will predictably hesitate, and such delay could ultimately allow an unfit candidate to return to office. This decision threatens to make the 14th Amendment’s disqualification clause functionally meaningless and dismisses the executive branch’s role as the Constitution’s enforcer. This dereliction could result in immeasurable harm to our democratic norms and institutions.

Why Congress Cannot Be Relied Upon

The Supreme Court's directive for Congress to manage Trump's eligibility is, at best, a misinterpretation of separation of powers and, at worst, a punt to stall accountability. Congress, as it currently stands, is hopelessly divided. With the House in disarray and Senate dynamics in flux, any effort to invoke Section 3 through congressional action would likely be marred by partisan divides, potentially allowing the issue to stall indefinitely. In this climate, Congress is ill-equipped to ensure the amendment’s enforcement.

Relying on a divided Congress to make a ruling on Trump’s eligibility is akin to granting immunity to those who flout our democratic principles. The power of enforcing the 14th Amendment’s disqualification clause lies in the hands of the executive branch, and President Biden has both the moral and constitutional responsibility to act.

Biden’s Unique Role and Responsibility

President Biden’s oath binds him to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." With this responsibility comes the duty to enforce the Constitution’s principles, including the 14th Amendment’s mandate that those who have sought to undermine or overthrow the government cannot hold public office. Trump’s actions during and after the January 6th insurrection meet this criterion. His attempt to overturn a democratic election was an act that sought to dismantle our government, fitting the definition of insurrection and directly contravening the 14th Amendment.

The Biden administration has a historic opportunity to set a precedent in enforcing constitutional protections. By declaring Trump ineligible, Biden would be upholding the Constitution in its entirety, not merely preserving a single part but safeguarding the whole. This decisive act would show that no individual, no matter how influential or powerful, is above the law.

How Do We Implore President Biden to Act?

The key question now is not merely one of legality but of will. How can we persuade President Biden to take this necessary action? This proposal must be voiced strongly by every American who cherishes the sanctity of democratic governance. Petitions, open letters, editorials, and media campaigns can be vehicles to communicate the urgency of this measure to the President and his advisors. This is no ordinary call to action; it is a call to uphold the fundamental fabric of American democracy.

Additionally, this issue should be debated on public platforms, encouraging national discourse on the precedent set by Trump’s conduct and the constitutional imperatives it triggers. We, the people, must demand a response that echoes the constitutional mandate to disqualify those who threaten our republic.

Time to Act

This moment is pivotal. The executive branch has long served as the enforcer of constitutional mandates when other branches falter or fail. President Biden must rise to this occasion, not merely as a politician but as a guardian of the democratic principles that underpin our society. The law is on his side, the Constitution mandates it, and history will remember his choice.

Let us make this appeal unmistakable and unyielding. We cannot afford to let constitutional enforcement fall by the wayside as we await a fractured Congress to take up its mantle.

William James Spriggs 

RESIST, EDUCATE, AND REBUILD

The True Betrayal: How Democracy Was Lost and Why We Must Fight Back

The tragedy of America’s descent into authoritarianism is layered with betrayal. At its core, the innocent are not those who blindly followed but those who fought steadfastly to preserve the principles of freedom, justice, and the rule of law. The intelligent, well-educated voters—those who truly understood the stakes—are most deeply betrayed by their fellow citizens and the society they sought to protect.

While the oligarchic billionaire class engineered this coup against democracy, they were far from alone in this undertaking. They mobilized a large population of voters, many of whom had no fundamental understanding of the consequences of their choices. The cultish allegiance to Trump and the rhetoric surrounding his rise convinced many to act directly against their best interests. These voters, swayed by hollow promises and stoked by manufactured fears, became the unwitting accomplices in dismantling their freedoms. It is tragic, yet inevitable, that one day they will recognize the terrible error of their decision.

But it is the intelligent, vigilant Americans who have been most betrayed. These citizens saw the danger coming, voted with reason and conscience, and spoke out to protect democracy, even as their warnings went unheeded. They understood that democracy, once lost, is not easily regained. Now, with the shackles of authoritarianism settling over the nation, turning the other cheek is not an option. For those of us who still believe in the values America was built upon, organized opposition is the only course left.

Organizing the Resistance

If history teaches us anything, tyranny cannot be met with passive acceptance. The opposition must be resilient, structured, and relentless. We must draw inspiration from the great resistance movements of the past, those that dared to fight back against overwhelming odds in the name of justice and human dignity. The struggle ahead is about reclaiming political power and rebuilding the fabric of democracy itself.

A resistance movement requires leaders from across society—activists, scholars, politicians, and community leaders—to forge a coalition capable of uniting those who value liberty and justice. It requires that we educate and mobilize, arming ourselves with facts, history, and the power of our convictions. Our previous article on Organized Resistance offers a roadmap for these efforts, with suggestions on grassroots organizing, legal resistance, and civil disobedience.

Educating the Betrayers

For democracy to survive, it must be grounded in an educated, informed populace. The oligarchs and demagogues who led the charge against democracy may be beyond persuasion, but their enablers, those who cast their votes blindly, must be educated—not out of disdain but because the very survival of a democratic society depends on it.

Education is often an endeavor of empathy, patient understanding, and seeking to enlighten. In this case, however, education must take on a new form. Those who subverted democracy must face the consequences of their actions, not only through legal accountability but also through a re-education process. Perhaps, for some, this will occur within prison walls as a direct outcome of their criminal actions. Here, stripped of the noise of propaganda, these individuals may begin to understand the depth of the damage they helped inflict on the country.

A Call to Action

The educated, those who value truth and justice, must no longer play defense. We must commit ourselves to this fight with all our resources. The opposition will require not only strategic resistance but also relentless education—education that is uncompromising, honest, and fearless. This battle is about more than just winning the next election; it’s about safeguarding the future of American democracy itself.

This is our task: to resist, to educate, and to rebuild. For the sake of those who have been betrayed, for the sake of truth, and the sake of future generations, we cannot let this betrayal go unanswered. We owe it to democracy—and ourselves—to resist the darkness and illuminate the path forward.

William James Spriggs

RESISTANCE WITH A CAPITAL "R"

Resistance in the Face of Tyranny: A Call to Action for Defending American Democracy

The 2024 election has ended, and with it, the unimaginable has become reality: the reins of power may soon return to Donald Trump, promising an administration unlike any seen in modern history. This moment demands resistance—organized, strategic, and unwavering. Democracy, once again, stands at a crossroads, and the responsibility to defend it rests squarely on our shoulders.

This article is a call to resistance, not just as a concept but as a defined movement. From the labor strikes of the 20th century to the civil rights marches of the 1960s, American history is rich with examples of people rising up against forces that threaten liberty, justice, and equality. Now, we look to those movements for inspiration and guidance as we plot a path forward in defense of democracy.

The History of Political Resistance Movements

Throughout history, resistance movements have sprung up in response to authoritarianism, injustice, and oppression. The American Revolution was born from resistance against tyranny, proving that organized efforts by dedicated individuals could create powerful change. In the 20th century, the civil rights movement leveraged nonviolent protest, legal challenges, and grassroots organizing to dismantle institutional racism. In South Africa, Nelson Mandela and the African National Congress (ANC) led a decades-long fight against apartheid, demonstrating the power of sustained, principled resistance.

Modern resistance, though, often faces sophisticated surveillance tools, disinformation, and political repression. Learning from the historical tactics used by these resistance movements can inform our strategy. We need an adaptive, resilient, and, above all, determined movement.

Steps to Building an Effective Resistance Movement

1. Establish Clear Leadership and Messaging

Resistance movements cannot succeed without clear leadership and a unifying message. Leadership should emerge from multiple sectors: activists, politicians, former military leaders, legal experts, and community organizers. Each must play a role in creating a resistance network that is both decentralized for security and unified in purpose.

A successful resistance movement must articulate clear goals and a message that resonates with the American people. This message must be rooted in American ideals of liberty, justice, and democracy, making it difficult for the opposition to paint resistance as anything other than patriotic.

2. Leverage Grassroots Support

True resistance is born from the grassroots. Communities, schools, churches, and social clubs should become organizing centers. The movement must be transparent and inclusive, involving people of all backgrounds who are willing to defend democratic values. Community events, town hall meetings, and local gatherings can build support, educate the public, and foster solidarity.

Social media and digital platforms will be essential tools in this stage. However, we must also be cautious of disinformation and create a trusted network of communication channels to keep the movement secure and unified.

3. Employ Nonviolent Tactics with a Strategic Edge

Nonviolent resistance has historically been one of the most effective tools against oppressive regimes. Organized boycotts, strikes, protests, and acts of civil disobedience can all be powerful tools to challenge authority and rally public support. A disciplined, nonviolent approach deprives the opposition of the opportunity to use force as a justified response.

Targeted economic pressure is also effective; boycotts can be organized against businesses and industries that support anti-democratic policies. Strategic protests and demonstrations in key locations can bring significant attention to the cause without risking lives or public backlash.

4. Legal and Institutional Resistance

The legal community must be mobilized to protect the Constitution and defend those persecuted for resisting authoritarian actions. Lawyers, scholars, and former public officials can use their knowledge of the law to mount a robust legal challenge to undemocratic actions, drawing on the Constitution, legal precedents, and human rights law.

Additionally, institutions like state governments, local governments, and even corporations have a role to play. Where the federal government fails, state and local governments can establish policies and protections that uphold democratic values, countering authoritarianism.

5. Prepare for Sustained Action and Support Networks

Effective resistance is not a sprint; it is a marathon. The Trump administration's policies and actions may stretch over the years, requiring an unwavering commitment from the resistance. Mental health and wellness programs and support systems should be established for those actively involved, ensuring that morale remains high and individuals are not overwhelmed by resistance demands.

Financial support networks are also vital. Funding from sympathetic organizations, charities, and individual donors can provide the resources necessary to sustain long-term operations. This can include everything from legal defense funds to support for families impacted by resistance activities.

6. Engage with International Allies

The threat posed by authoritarianism in the United States has global implications, and international allies can play a crucial role in the resistance. Human rights organizations, foreign governments that uphold democratic principles, and international advocacy groups can provide additional resources, diplomatic pressure, and moral support.

The resistance movement should not be isolated. Fostering connections with allies abroad gives it legitimacy and reinforces the message that defending democracy in the United States is a global cause.

A Call to Action

Resistance is not just a reaction but a commitment to the ideals upon which this nation was built. A movement grounded in moral clarity, guided by a united leadership, and supported by everyday Americans can become an unyielding force in the face of tyranny.

This is a time for courageous and resolute action. As Americans, we must resist not out of anger but out of a fierce commitment to freedom, equality, and justice. Resistance is not simply about rejecting an administration; it is about upholding the principles that define us as a people and protect our future as a nation.

Our strength lies in unity, courage, conviction, and power in collective action.

William James Spriggs

 

   

TRUMP IS OUR SERVANT

An Open Letter to President Trump: Remembering Who’s the Boss

Dear President Trump,

As citizens of the United States, we remind you of a fundamental truth: in a democracy, the people hold the ultimate power. Our government exists with the consent of the governed, and every official, from local representatives to the president, serves at the will of the people. We are your boss.

When we cast our ballots, we don’t simply elect a leader—we appoint a public servant. The role of the President is not to impose personal will upon the nation but to listen to, represent, and act on behalf of the diverse voices that make up this country. Like all those elected, you are accountable to us and must respond to the needs and will of the American people.

We ask you to remember this relationship. You are not here to lead with unchecked authority or to cater to the sycophants who may surround you. Instead, you are here to represent every American, to listen with humility, and to act with respect for the Constitution and the values of our democracy. Your position is one of privilege and responsibility and should be treated with the seriousness it deserves.

Over the past years, Americans have seen divisions widen, trust in institutions falter, and fear of political manipulation grow. Many feel that government is no longer responsive to the people it serves. Our leaders must honor their role as public servants to restore this trust.

We are your employers, and we reserve the right to hold you accountable. This accountability extends beyond election cycles—it is our duty, as engaged citizens, to voice our concerns, advocate for justice, and insist that government policies reflect the needs of the people. Our voices, whether spoken directly or through our representatives, are powerful, and we intend to use them to ensure that our government, including your office, serves the people.

We demand policies that uplift the people, respect for all voices in this great nation, and transparency in every decision that impacts our lives. This country was founded on the idea that government derives power from the people, and we stand united in our commitment to uphold that principle.

President Trump, remember: you work for us. We will hold you accountable, be heard, and  insist that our democracy remains a government of, by, and for the people.

Respectfully,

The American People