BEYOND RELIGION AND POLITICS

 

Beyond Religion and Politics: Humanity’s Next Stage

For thousands of years, two systems have dominated human life: religion and politics. One claimed authority from the heavens; the other claimed authority from the people. Together they shaped cultures, created nations, justified wars, inspired art, and built civilizations.

But both systems share something more profound, and darker, in common:

They are rooted not in clarity or evidence, but in superstition, fear, and tribal survival strategies that predate reason by a long time.
And today, both are failing us.

The truth is simple and unavoidable:
Humanity has already moved beyond religion and politics, even if our institutions have not yet caught up.

We are living in the early years of a new era—one that demands intelligence, not superstition; systems, not slogans; and thinking, not tribalism. Religion and politics can no longer provide that.

I. Religion as Evolution’s Old Ghost

Religion was humanity’s first operating system:
a way to explain storms, disease, birth, death, and the terrifying unknown. It offered stories, rituals, and a sense of community that helped early humans survive.

But its foundation was always the same: superstition built on fear.

Faith replaced evidence, myth replaced inquiry, and dogma replaced evolution.

Today we know better.

We understand biology, physics, consciousness, and the universe in ways no ancient religion ever imagined. We no longer need supernatural explanations for natural events. And with each scientific breakthrough, from Darwin to Hubble to AI, the grip of superstition weakens.

It is not that religion is disappearing; somewhat, it has already been superseded.
Its usefulness as a unifying community structure has eroded.
Its teachings no longer guide modern ethics.
Its political entanglements now harm more than they help.

We are not “losing religion.”
We are outgrowing it.

II. Politics: The Obsolete Machinery of Human Organization

If religion were our first operating system, politics would be the second.

Politics evolved to allocate power, mediate conflict, and organize society. But like religion, it is rooted in ancient instincts:

• tribal loyalty,
• fear of outsiders,
• dominance,
• hierarchy,
• emotional manipulation,
• and us-versus-them thinking.

These instincts served us in small bands of hunter-gatherers.
They are catastrophically unfit for a global civilization of eight billion people.

Politics today does not represent intelligence, morality, empathy, or progress.
It represents the worst of human psychology, amplified by the media and weaponized by demagogues.

And like religion, politics now impedes the survival of the species:

• It blocks cooperation on climate.
• It undermines truth.
• It rewards rage over reason.
• It fractures communities instead of building them.
• It elevates power over problem-solving.

Humanity has evolved, but politics has not.
It is a 4,000-year-old tool trying to manage a 21st-century world.
And it can’t.

We are not “approaching the limits” of politics.
We have already gone beyond it.

III. Artificial Intelligence: The Third Operating System

Standing on the horizon is the next great force: artificial intelligence.
Unlike religion, AI does not rely on myth.
Unlike politics, it does not rely on tribal instinct.

AI amplifies both the best and worst of human nature, but it does so using logic, structure, and evidence, the very qualities our older systems lack.

AI is not a replacement for religion or politics.
It is something more profound:

A new organizing intelligence.

On the good side, AI can:

• Expose falsehoods and propaganda
• Replace superstition with knowledge
• Fix systems of governance
• Optimize resource distribution
• Reduce conflict through prediction
• Advance science, medicine, and human welfare

It can help us evolve beyond the limits of our ancient wiring.

On the negative side, AI may control, manipulate, or dominate us if left unchecked.
That is a genuine and urgent concern.

But here is the point:

Whether we fear it or embrace it,
AI is the force that will move humanity beyond religion and politics, because nothing else can.

We can no longer be governed by superstition.
We can no longer be organized by tribal conflict.

We require systems driven by truth, reason, evidence, and fairness.
AI is the only system capable of operating at that level.

IV. The Transition Has Already Begun

Look around:

• Young people are turning away from religion in historic numbers.
• Political institutions are collapsing under their own corruption.
• Truth is devalued.
• Old structures are hollow.
• Traditional authorities no longer command respect.
• AI is creeping into every dimension of life.

We are not waiting to go beyond religion and politics.
We are already there.

What remains is to acknowledge it and to shape what comes next.

The question is no longer whether religion or politics can save us.
They cannot.

The question is whether human intelligence, natural and artificial, can create a new system that finally matches the potential of our species.

V. Conclusion: The Future Is Not What We Were Promised

Humanity has outgrown its old myths and its old machinery.
Religion and politics, once essential for survival, are now obstacles to it.

They divide us when the world demands unity.
They cling to superstition when the world demands knowledge.
They reward tribal conflict when the world demands cooperation.

The future will belong to those who can imagine life beyond these ancient systems. And who can guide AI toward helping us evolve, not regress?

We are entering the third great chapter of human organization:

• From superstition → religion
• From tribe → politics
• From intelligence → artificial intelligence

The only question now is whether we shape the future,
or the future shapes us.

William James Spriggs

THE DANGEROUS TRUTH ABOUT ILLEGAL ORDERS

THE DANGEROUS TRUTH ABOUT ILLEGAL ORDERS

We often hear the comforting phrase:
“The military will not obey an illegal order.”
It sounds reassuring, but it leaves out the most crucial fact:

No system determines in real-time whether an order is legal or illegal.

That gap is the danger.

1. What the Rule Really Means

The U.S. military teaches that service members must obey lawful orders and refrain from disobeying any unlawful orders.
This principle comes from:

• the Nuremberg trials,
• the My Lai massacre case,
• and the military’s own codes and training.

So yes, the rule is absolute.

But the process behind it is almost nonexistent.

2. Courts Won’t Review Orders Before They’re Carried Out

If a president issues a questionable order, the military cannot ask a judge:

“Is this legal?”

Civilian courts do not provide advance answers.
Military courts only review orders after someone has obeyed or refused.

That means:

• If a soldier obeys an illegal order, they can be punished later.
• If they refuse an order, they can also be punished, unless the court agrees with them afterward.

There is no safe way to test the order up front.

Someone has to take the risk.

3. The Constitutional Blind Spot

This creates a vulnerability in our system:

A president who wants to misuse power can give orders in the “gray zone,” knowing:

• courts cannot review them ahead of time,
• Congress cannot act fast enough,
• and military officers may hesitate to be the one who refuses.

The unlawful-order rule exists,
but it depends entirely on the courage of individuals, not on a working legal process.

That is too fragile a foundation for a modern democracy.

4. What We Need

To protect the Republic, we should establish:

• A rapid, independent review process to judge questionable orders,
• Legal safeguards for officers who refuse unlawful commands,
• Clearer standards defining what constitutes an illegal order, especially in domestic situations.

Right now, none of this exists.

5. The Bottom Line

The military is trained to disobey illegal orders,
but no one determines legality in the moment.

Until this gap is addressed, the safety of the Constitution relies on personal bravery rather than the law.

That is a risk we can no longer afford to ignore.

William James Spriggs

  

UNLAWFUL MILITARY ORDERS

THE UNLAWFUL ORDER DOCTRINE AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL VOID

For months, commentators have been repeating a reassuring mantra:
“The military is not required to obey an unlawful order.”

It is true.
It is also dangerously incomplete.

Most Americans assume there is a clear legal pathway for determining whether a presidential order is lawful, enforceable, or binding on a military officer. They imagine there must be a statute, a defined process, or a court that can step in if a president, any president, attempts to misuse the armed forces for illegal or unconstitutional ends.

But this belief is false.

The unsettling truth is that while the doctrine exists, the mechanism for enforcing it does not. This creates a constitutional void at the precise point where the republic is most vulnerable.

I. What the Law Actually Says

Contrary to popular misconception, there is no single statute that says a service member “shall disobey unlawful orders.” The duty is derived from several overlapping principles:

1. The UCMJ binds service members only to “lawful” orders.

Article 92 criminalizes failure to obey “a lawful order,” implying that an unlawful one carries no force.
But it does not define how to determine that lawfulness in the moment.

2. The Manual for Courts-Martial

It states that a lawful order must relate to military duty, must not conflict with the Constitution or statutes, and must not violate rights or the law of war.

3. The Nuremberg Principles

Adopted into U.S. military teaching, they reject “I was just following orders” as a defense when the order is manifestly unlawful.

4. U.S. v. Calley

After the My Lai massacre, the court held that soldiers remain liable for obeying “manifestly illegal” orders, even in wartime.

Together these sources form the doctrine.
But they share one weakness: none provides a mechanism for advance review.

II. The Conundrum: No Court Will Review an Order Before It Is Carried Out

This is where the warm reassurance of the doctrine dissolves into dangerous ambiguity.

Civilian courts will not intervene.

The Supreme Court has long held—most notably in Gilligan v. Morgan—that courts cannot supervise military operations or review hypothetical or anticipated orders.

Federal courts cannot issue advisory opinions.

A service member cannot ask a judge:

• “If ordered to deploy troops domestically, must I obey?”
• “If ordered to arrest political opponents, may I refuse?”
• “Is this presidential directive unlawful?”

The case would be dismissed for lack of ripeness, standing, and justiciability.

Military courts only act after the fact.

The only venue where legality is reviewed is a court-martial, and only after a service member has:

1. Disobeyed the order, or
2. Obeyed it and is being prosecuted for the resulting act.

In other words:

The system resolves unlawful order disputes only by punishing the person who made the incorrect guess.

There is no channel for a declaratory judgment.
No injunction.
No emergency review.
No real-time constitutional referee.

---

III. Who Carries the Burden? The Individual Officer

The unlawful-order doctrine relies entirely on the courage and conscience of individual service members.

There is no institutional safeguard.
No supervisory court.
No administrative review panel.

A lieutenant colonel, a JAG officer, a sergeant, or a four-star general must make a split-second determination:

• Is this order legal?
• Constitutional?
• Within the President’s authority?
• A violation of the law of war?
• A domestic deployment forbidden by the Posse Comitatus Act?
• A misuse of force?

If they guess wrong, they face court-martial, prison, or career destruction.

If they guess right and obey an unlawful order, they face criminal liability.

This is not a system designed for clarity or stability.
It is a system designed for deterrence through fear, not prevention.

IV. The Trump Problem (and Any Rogue Executive)

The danger is not ideological; it is structural.

A president inclined to misuse power could exploit the void:

• by issuing orders in a gray zone,
• by couching political objectives as national security operations,
• by relying on commanders’ reluctance to risk their careers, and
• by knowing that no court can intervene unless someone first refuses.

This is not about Donald Trump alone.
It is about any president, now or in the future, who discovers how much room the law leaves for mischief.

The safeguards are not judicial.
They are not legislative.
They are not procedural.

They are personal.

They depend on the integrity of individual officers.

That is a terrifying place for a republic to leave its constitutional survival.

V. What Must Be Done

If the republic is to protect itself, we need reforms that introduce:

1. A mechanism for pre-order legal review.

An emergency panel of federal judges, or a standing constitutional review board, could issue binding determinations on the legality of contested orders.

2. Statutory clarification of unlawful orders.

Congress can define:

• what constitutes an unlawful domestic deployment,
• limits on use of force,
• restrictions on political uses of the military, and
• explicit officer protections for refusing unlawful commands.

3. A safe-harbor statute.

Service members who refuse orders based on good-faith constitutional objections should be shielded from retaliation until lawfulness is determined.

4. Public transparency.

The nation must understand the fragility of this area of law.
Silence empowers the worst actors.

VI. The Conclusion No One Wants to Say Aloud

The American military is trained to obey lawful orders.
It is also trained to disobey unlawful orders.
But there is no reliable way to know which is which in the moment.

That is the flaw.

That is the danger.

And that is why merely repeating “the military won’t follow illegal orders” is not enough.
We must revise the law, clarify the process, and protect the officers who safeguard the republic, not after the fact, but before the damage is done.

Until then, the survival of constitutional government rests on individual judgment, individual courage, and the hope that no president will test the system to the point of failure.

Hope is not a legal safeguard.
We need real ones.

William James Spriggs

 

THE LOST SENSE OF COMMUNITY

The Lost Sense of Community — And the Republic That Cannot Survive Without It

For most of human history, the real value of religion was not its creeds, its doctrines, or its promises of reward. Its value was community.

Religion once brought people together in circles of mutual care. It taught neighbors to look after one another, to share burdens, to visit the sick, to lift the poor, to comfort the grieving, and to make the lonely feel less alone. At its best, religion was a social institution of beneficence, a place where people formed bonds of empathy and responsibility that extended far beyond the sanctuary walls.

That was the true strength of religion in America:
not the theology, but the community;
not the sermons, but the shared humanity;
Not the miracles, but the mutual support.

But that world is gone.

Religion Has Shifted Away From Community

Over the past half-century, organized religion in America has drifted from its communal purpose to something fundamentally different:

• Political machinery, mobilized to win elections, punish opponents, and impose ideology.
• Economic enterprises, focused on prosperity, wealth, and celebrity pastors.
• Cultural combat units, waging war against perceived enemies instead of building bridges between neighbors.

In this transformation, religion has lost the one thing that made it indispensable:
Its role is the builder and sustainer of community.

Today, religion can no longer be trusted to support the moral cohesion a republic requires. It is too fragmented, too politicized, too financially driven, and too invested in tribal identity. Its attention has turned away from the local and the human, toward the national and the partisan.

And with the decline of religious community, something even more profound has collapsed: people have lost the habit of belonging to one another.

Where Is Community Now?

Look at America today and ask a simple question:
Where is the sense of community?

It is not in our churches, too political.
Not in our politics, too hostile.
Not in our neighborhoods, too transient.
Not in our digital world, too remote and shallow.

We live in a nation of isolated individuals, each convinced of their own righteousness, each defending their own grievances, each living inside a sealed bubble of curated information and emotional insulation. The result is a fractured abstraction of “freedom” that leaves citizens adrift, unmoored from one another.

No republic can survive that.

A functioning republic depends on a shared sense of belonging, recognizing that we are responsible not just for ourselves but for one another. Democracy is not merely a system of voting; it is a system of community. Without that, the political structure collapses, because nothing binds the citizens together except anger and fear.

And we are living that collapse now.

The Repair of the Republic Begins With Community

If America is to be repaired, morally, politically, socially, our first task is not constitutional reform or economic restructuring.
It is the reconstruction of the community at every level:

• Local community, where people rediscover neighborliness, responsibility, and the human face of empathy.
• State community, where civic identity transcends political branding.
• National community, where we remember that a nation is not a collection of warring tribes but a union of people with shared stakes in one another’s future.

We must restore what religion once nurtured but can no longer guarantee: a fabric of mutual care.

A New Moral Leadership

This work requires a new kind of leadership, as the old institutions cannot be relied upon. We need:

• Leaders who understand empathy not as weakness but as civic necessity.
• Leaders who see morality as a lived practice, not a rhetorical weapon.
• Leaders who serve all people, not just their own political tribes.
• Leaders who know that a democratic republic is only as strong as the compassion of its citizens.

The restoration of America will not come from ideology, dogma, or false piety. It will come from communities rebuilt, empathy rekindled, and moral leadership reclaimed.

Religion once helped us do this.
Today, it cannot.
So the responsibility now falls on us, citizens who still believe in humanity, decency, and the shared moral destiny of a free people.

Sermons will not save the republic.
It will be saved by the community,
reborn.

William James Spriggs

AI AND THE END OF THE MIDDLE CLASS

Alarm: The Artificial Intelligence Race and the End of the Middle Class

The American middle class is vanishing before our eyes. Wages stagnate, costs soar, and our tax system rewards those who already have far too much. But an even greater danger is upon us, one that could make today’s inequality look mild by comparison. That danger is the unchecked rise of artificial intelligence.

Across every industry, billions of dollars are being poured into AI development. From Wall Street to Silicon Valley, corporate executives are racing to deploy automation at any cost. And while they celebrate “innovation” and “efficiency,” the reality is darker: the owners of AI will get richer, while millions of middle and working-class Americans lose their livelihoods.

This is not a distant threat. It is happening now.

A Machine for Transferring Wealth Upward

Artificial intelligence, as currently developed, is a machine for concentrating wealth. It automates tasks once performed by humans, boosts corporate profits, and eliminates payroll costs. The gains flow upward to shareholders and tech oligarchs while the displaced workforce is left scrambling for part-time, low-pay, “gig” work that offers no security or benefits.

The argument that “new jobs will replace the old ones” is a comforting myth. The Industrial Revolution built new industries that required human hands. The AI revolution eliminates the need for them. Once knowledge itself can be replicated and deployed by a machine, the worker, the teacher, the accountant, the driver, the lawyer, is no longer essential. Without intervention, this dynamic will collapse what remains of the middle class.

Government’s Abdication

The federal government, rather than acting as a guardian of fairness, has chosen to serve the interests of the wealthy. Recent proposals in Congress, backed by lobbyists from Big Tech, have sought to ban states from regulating AI altogether. The message is clear: prioritize corporate profits over public welfare.

This administration, like its predecessor, refuses to confront economic reality. Its tax policies remain regressive, its priorities tilted toward corporate contributors, and its blindness to middle-class suffering is complete. The public is told to “adapt,” while the very technologies threatening their jobs are subsidized by their tax dollars.

What Must Be Done

If democracy is to survive, Congress must act now. The development and deployment of AI cannot be left to those who profit from it. The people’s government must assert control, just as it once did over railroads, monopolies, and unsafe industries.

Here are specific measures that must be enacted immediately:

1. Establish a Federal AI Regulatory Authority
   A new, independent, transparent, and robust agency should oversee every central AI system, with the authority to audit, approve, or ban deployments based on their social and economic impact. No AI that destroys jobs on a mass scale should be unleashed without public consent and compensatory safeguards.
2. Require Economic Impact Assessments
   Every significant AI deployment must include a public report detailing expected job displacement, wage effects, and community impacts. Companies that profit from automation must contribute to funds for retraining, transition assistance, and social reinvestment.
3. Implement an AI Wealth Tax and Value Dividend
   The wealth created by automation should not be privately hoarded. A portion of AI-driven profits must be taxed and redistributed to the public through universal basic services, guaranteed income programs, or public ownership of AI infrastructure.
4. Protect and Empower Workers
   Workers should have the legal right to negotiate and bargain over the implementation of AI in their workplaces. An algorithm without negotiation, notice, and compensation should replace no employee. Unionization and retraining must be encouraged, not undermined.
5. Slow or Halt Deployment in High-Risk Sectors
   Where AI threatens massive job losses in transportation, logistics, customer service, and education, the government should impose moratoriums until protective frameworks are in place.
6. Ensure Transparency and Accountability
   Any AI system that makes decisions affecting human lives, employment, credit, and healthcare must be fully explainable and subject to human review. Black-box algorithms must not rule our future.
7. Coordinate Internationally
   The U.S. must not join a global race to the bottom in deregulation. We must lead an international compact that ties technological progress to human progress, not exploitation.

The Moral Imperative

We cannot allow a technology designed by the few to dictate the fate of the many. Unchecked, artificial intelligence will not liberate humanity. It will enslave it economically. It will transform citizens into data points, workers into relics, and democracy into an oligarchy.

This is not science fiction. It is unfolding in real time. And without government control, public oversight, and redistribution of AI’s gains, we are engineering a future in which freedom belongs only to those who own the code.

A Call to Courage

This is an alarm, not a lament. We can act, but only if we act now. Congress must reclaim its duty to govern in the public interest. The American people must demand that AI serve humanity, not replace it. And those of us who still believe in fairness, equality, and the moral worth of every citizen must raise our voices before the machine drowns us out.

Artificial intelligence must not become a form of artificial democracy.
The choice is ours while we still have one.

William James Spriggs

 

 

They Stood for Us

They stood for us — young once, strong once,
In places far from home.
Where orders came from voices firm,
And fear was overflown.

 

They wore their country’s cloth with pride,
Its flag upon their sleeve,
And in that trust, they carried hope
For all who still believe.

 

The Army marched through foreign fields,
Through mud and steel and flame,
“First to fight for right and freedom,”
They earned a nation's name.

 

The Navy sailed on restless seas,
Where courage met the storm,
From carrier decks to PT boats,
Their valor was the norm.
And Bob, our comrade still with us,
Who braved the waves and pain,
You brought the wounded safely home,
And we will not forget your name.

 

The Air Force soared where eagles climb,
Above the clouds of fear,
“Off we go into the wild blue yonder,”
They carried freedom near.

 

The Marines — my brothers in arms,
“From the halls of Montezuma” still rings true,
Their creed of honor, courage, and commitment
Binds the old Corps to the new.

 

The Coast Guard stood “Semper Paratus,”
Ready day and night,
To guard our shores, our ports, our seas,
Their vigilance our light.

 

Across the decades, wars have changed,
But one thing never will:
The hearts of those who serve still beat
With duty, faith, and skill.

 

They traded youth for liberty,
Their dreams for our tomorrows,
They bore the weight so we could rest
Free from tyrants’ sorrows.

 

Now gathered here at Merrill Gardens,
We honor those who gave,
Not just their strength, but their example,
Their courage, calm, and grace.

 

To every veteran in this room,
And those who rest in peace,
We say with deepest gratitude,
Your watch secured our peace.

 

So when the bugle’s final call
Echoes through the years,
May we remember what you gave
Through laughter, and through tears.

 

You stood for us.
Today, we stand for you.
Semper Fidelis, and thank you.

 

ANTHOLOGY ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

 

HOW YOUR LAWYER SHOULD AND SHOULDN'T USE AI

How Your Lawyer Should, and Shouldn’t, Use AI

Artificial Intelligence is changing nearly every profession, and the legal field is no exception. Many lawyers are now using AI tools to help with research, contract review, and drafting legal documents. That can be a good thing, saving time and reducing client costs.

But here’s the part you need to know: AI isn’t magic or perfect.

AI can make mistakes. Sometimes it “hallucinates”, meaning it invents facts or legal cases that don’t exist. Sometimes it misreads the law. Sometimes, it overlooks essential details that an experienced lawyer would catch instantly.

That’s why you, as the client, should make sure your lawyer follows two basic rules:

1. They Tell You When They’re Using AI

You have the right to know if AI is being used in your case. Many states will soon require lawyers to tell clients up front. Even if the rules don’t require it yet, you should ask.

Questions to ask your lawyer:

• “Will you be using AI on my case?”
• “If so, what for?”
• “Will I see the AI’s work product?”

2. They Check AI’s Work

No AI output should be used without being carefully reviewed by a lawyer who understands your type of case. Your lawyer should double-check every citation, every fact, and every conclusion before relying on it.

Questions to ask your lawyer:

• “How do you verify the information AI gives you?”
• “Who in your firm reviews AI-assisted work?”

Why This Matters for You

The main benefit of AI is speed. It can make document review and research much faster. That can mean lower legal bills. But if AI’s mistakes slip through, it can cost you much more. in lost cases, bad contracts, or legal exposure.

AI should be a tool to help your lawyer do their job better, not a shortcut to avoid doing it. The best lawyers will be the ones who know how to use AI responsibly and who keep you informed every step of the way.

Client Checklist: Questions to Ask Before Your Lawyer Uses AI

About AI Use:

• Will you be using AI for my case?
• What tasks will AI handle?
• Will I be told every time AI is used?

About Oversight:

• Who reviews AI’s work in your firm?
• How do you verify AI’s facts and citations?
• What safeguards are in place to catch AI errors?

About Costs and Benefits:

• Will using AI reduce my legal bill?
• Could using AI in my case create any risks?

Bottom line: You’re not hiring a computer; you’re hiring a lawyer. Ensure the lawyer stays in control, uses AI wisely, and keeps you in the loop.

William James Spriggs

Wednesday, September 3, 2025

HOW TO PUBLISH THE UNIVERSAL MORAL CODE

Circulation of the Universal Moral Code

Objective

To introduce the Universal Moral Code into global discussions on AI ethics, human rights, and governance, securing recognition, endorsements, and eventual adoption by international bodies, governments, and AI developers.

---

1. Immediate Actions (Next 30–60 Days)

a. Establish Public Record

• Publish the Code on your blog (wspriggs2.blogspot.com), framed as a public declaration.
• Create a simple standalone website (e.g., universalmoralcode.org) hosting the PDF, translations, and endorsements.

b. Academic & Professional Publication

• Submit the Code as a short declaration to journals in law, ethics, and AI policy (e.g., AI & Society, Ethics and Information Technology).
• Write a companion essay for The Atlantic or MIT Technology Review.

c. Early Endorsements

• Reach out to sympathetic academics in AI ethics (Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute, MIT CSAIL, Stanford HAI).
• Contact NGOs like Future of Life Institute and Partnership on AI for endorsement.

---

2. Medium-Term Actions (2–6 Months)

a. International Bodies

• Send the Code, with a cover letter, to:
• UNESCO (which already produced an AI ethics recommendation).
• UN Human Rights Council (tie to universal rights).
• OECD AI Policy Observatory.
• World Economic Forum’s AI Governance Initiative.

b. National Governments

• U.S. Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP).
• EU AI Act Committee.
• UK AI Safety Institute.
• Canada’s Pan-Canadian AI Strategy team.

c. Conferences & Summits

• Apply to present at AI safety conferences (NeurIPS workshops, AI & Ethics conferences).
• Submit to law and democracy events (American Bar Association, Association for Computing Machinery).

---

3. Long-Term Actions (6–18 Months)

a. Endorsement Campaign

• Launch an open letter with signatures from scholars, policymakers, and citizens.
• Translate Code into at least 5 major languages (French, Spanish, Mandarin, Arabic, Russian).

b. Integration into Standards

• Submit the Code as a reference framework to IEEE AI Ethics Standards and ISO AI Governance standards.

c. Institutional Partnerships

• Approach think tanks and philanthropic foundations (Ford, MacArthur, Gates, Carnegie).
• Propose partnerships with universities (MIT, Stanford, Oxford, Cambridge).

---

4. Communications Tools

Sample Cover Letter (for UN/AI Companies/Academics)

Subject: Proposal: Adoption of the Universal Moral Code for AI and Humanity

Dear [Name/Organization],

I am submitting for your consideration the Universal Moral Code: A Declaration for All Intelligences. This document establishes a simple, universal moral baseline — beginning with the principle “Do no harm” — that applies equally to humans, artificial intelligences, and future forms of intelligence.

The Code is modeled on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is intended as a foundational reference for AI governance, human rights, and international cooperation. Its adoption would provide clarity, restraint, and shared responsibility at a time when rapid technological change risks outpacing our moral consensus.

I respectfully request your review and consideration of endorsing or circulating the Universal Moral Code within your body.

Sincerely,
William J. Spriggs
Author, Attorney, Former U.S. Marine Corps Captain

---

Talking Points for Promotion

• “The Universal Moral Code is to AI what the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was to postwar governance.”
• “It binds both humans and AI to the same foundational principle: Do no harm.”
• “It is simple, universal, and enforceable by conscience before law.”

---

5. First Practical Steps (Suggested Order)

1. Post the Code to your blog.
2. Register universalmoralcode.org (can be simple, single-page).
3. Send first cover letters to:
• UNESCO AI Ethics division
• Partnership on AI
• Future of Life Institute
4. Reach out to one academic ally (Stanford HAI or MIT CSAIL).
5. Draft op-ed for The Atlantic or Foreign Affairs.

---

⚖️ Bottom line: If circulated strategically, the Code can become a reference point in AI governance and human rights discussions, much like the UDHR — aspirational at first, but increasingly cited until it becomes embedded in law and practice.

---

Would you like me to go one step further and draft the actual emails/letters for the first batch of recipients (e.g., UNESCO, Partnership on AI, an academic ally), so you’d be ready to start sending them out?

1. UNESCO (AI Ethics Division)

Subject: Submission: The Universal Moral Code – A Declaration for All Intelligences

Dear Director [Name],

I write to submit for UNESCO’s consideration a document I have authored entitled The Universal Moral Code: A Declaration for All Intelligences. This charter builds upon UNESCO’s existing work on AI ethics and seeks to establish a clear, universal moral baseline for both humanity and artificial intelligences.

Its foundation is simple yet profound: Do no harm. The Code affirms that this principle must apply equally to human beings, artificial intelligences, and all future intelligences. It is written in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but with attention to the responsibilities of emerging technologies.

I respectfully ask that UNESCO consider circulating this document among its AI ethics committees, working groups, and international forums, and explore avenues for its endorsement or integration into your ongoing work.

I would be honored to discuss this further or provide additional materials at your request.

Sincerely,
William J. Spriggs
Attorney, Author, Former U.S. Marine Corps Captain

---

2. Partnership on AI

Subject: Proposal for Circulation: The Universal Moral Code

Dear [Name],

The Partnership on AI has done admirable work in convening diverse stakeholders to address the ethical challenges of artificial intelligence. In that same spirit, I submit for your review the Universal Moral Code: A Declaration for All Intelligences.

The Code sets forth seven simple articles, beginning with the principle of Do no harm, and is intended as a baseline ethical framework binding on all intelligences — human and artificial. It is concise, universal, and designed to complement existing governance efforts.

I invite the Partnership to consider endorsing the Code, hosting it within your resource library, or including it as a discussion point in your convenings. I believe it aligns strongly with your mission to ensure AI benefits people and society.

Thank you for your attention and for the important work you do.

Sincerely,
William J. Spriggs

---

3. Academic Ally (e.g., Stanford HAI or MIT CSAIL)

Subject: Invitation to Endorse and Circulate the Universal Moral Code

Dear Professor [Name],

As a scholar deeply engaged in the ethics of artificial intelligence, I believe you may find interest in a declaration I have authored: The Universal Moral Code: A Declaration for All Intelligences.

This document proposes a simple, universal moral baseline — beginning with “Do no harm” — that applies equally to human beings and artificial intelligences. It is designed to be both aspirational and practical, in the tradition of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

I respectfully request your review and, if you find merit in the work, your endorsement or circulation within your academic network. Scholarly recognition is essential if this Code is to gain traction in the broader policy and governance landscape.

A copy of the Code is attached in PDF form. I would be grateful for your feedback, and for any introductions to colleagues or forums where this work may contribute to the ongoing dialogue.

With appreciation,
William J. Spriggs

---

⚖️ Next step for you:

• Identify 1–2 people or offices at each of these organizations. (I can help you find contact info or the right titles if you’d like.)
• Send these letters with the PDF attached (the one we formatted earlier).
• Post the Code on your blog/website so you can also link it directly.

 

 

 

Wednesday, December 4, 2024

ASPIRATION BOOK OUTLINE

 

Expanded Outline: Humanity’s Aspirations and the Role of Artificial Intelligence

Introduction

• The foundational question: Does humanity have a singular goal?
• The evolution of aspirations from survival to transcendence.
• The arrival of AI as a catalyst for reevaluating humanity's trajectory.

---

1. The Philosophical Question: Does Humanity Aspire?

• Historical Perspectives on Aspiration

  • Ancient philosophies: Greek teleology (Aristotle's "final cause"), Eastern perspectives on balance and purpose.
  • Enlightenment ideas: Human progress and reason.
  • Existentialism: A search for meaning in a chaotic world (Sartre, Camus).

• Modern Perspectives on Aspiration

  • Survival vs. flourishing: Is survival the baseline, or do humans have an inherent need to "reach" for something greater?
  • Psychological perspectives: Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and aspirations as part of self-actualization.

• The Dilemma of Collective Aspiration

  • Is it possible for humanity to have a unified goal?
  • Examples of unity in purpose: the Space Race, global efforts to eradicate disease.

---

2. Humanity’s Core Aspirations

• Survival Beyond Earth

  • Why survival has expanded to include multi-planetary ambitions (influences of thinkers like Carl Sagan, Elon Musk).
  • Ethical dilemmas of colonizing other planets: Are we exporting human flaws?

• Understanding the Universe

  • The role of science and philosophy in humanity’s quest for knowledge.
  • Intersections between scientific discovery and existential inquiry (Stephen Hawking, Neil deGrasse Tyson).

• Moral and Social Progress

  • Historical milestones: abolition of slavery, universal suffrage, civil rights.
  • The ongoing struggle for justice and equality: What does progress mean in an age of AI and globalization?

• Legacy and Creativity

  • Art, culture, and innovation as expressions of the human spirit.
  • How AI is reshaping creative fields: a threat or an opportunity?

---

3. Obstacles to Aspirations

• Short-Term Thinking

  • The impact of political and economic systems on long-term planning.
  • Case studies: Climate change policies, global pandemics.

• Division and Conflict

  • Tribalism and ideological divides as barriers to global cooperation.
  • Lessons from history: When humanity overcame division to achieve greatness.

• Technological Risks

  • The dual-edged sword of technological progress: From nuclear weapons to AI.
  • Current risks posed by AI and the importance of ethical frameworks.

---

4. The Role of Artificial Intelligence

• AI as a Tool

  • Case studies of AI solving problems: Healthcare, climate modeling, and education.
  • Opportunities for collaboration between humans and AI.

• AI as a Threat

  • Scenarios of AI dominance: speculative fiction vs. realistic concerns.
  • Ethical considerations: How to program AI with human values.

• What Does an AI-Dominated Future Look Like?

  • Symbiotic relationships vs. dystopian control.
  • Philosophical implications: What happens if AI surpasses human intelligence in creativity and ethics?

---

5. Who Guides Humanity’s Aspirations?

• Historical Thinkers and Their Influence

  • Socrates, Confucius, and religious leaders on the nature of purpose.
  • The Enlightenment’s legacy of rational thought.

• Modern Philosophers and Thinkers

  • Nick Bostrom on existential risks.
  • Yuval Noah Harari on humanity’s future with AI.
  • Contributions from ethicists like Peter Singer and Martha Nussbaum.

• AI Ethics and Philosophy Today

  • Insights from leaders like Timnit Gebru on bias and fairness in AI.
  • The need for interdisciplinary collaboration between technologists and philosophers.

---

6. What Will It Take to Achieve Humanity’s Goals?

• Global Cooperation

  • Examples of successful cooperation: The Paris Agreement, the International Space Station.
  • How humanity can build a framework for shared goals.

• Ethical Frameworks for Technology

  • The role of governments, private companies, and international organizations.
  • Philosophical underpinnings of AI ethics: What values should AI reflect?

• Education and Empowerment

  • Preparing the next generation for a world increasingly shaped by AI.
  • The role of education in fostering critical thinking and adaptability.

---

7. The Future of Humanity and Artificial Intelligence

• Scenarios for the Next Century

  • Positive outcomes: AI as humanity’s greatest ally.
  • Negative outcomes: Loss of autonomy and potential extinction.

• Philosophical Reflections

  • Does humanity’s purpose change in an AI-dominated world?
  • The potential for AI to help us redefine our aspirations and achieve them.

---

Conclusion

• Revisiting the core question: What does humanity aspire to, and how can those aspirations be achieved in an age of AI?
• A call to action: Fostering a balance between technological progress and ethical responsibility to ensure humanity’s goals remain central.

---

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

FACT CHECKING AI

The Rise of the AI Fact-Checking Industry: A New Pillar of the Digital Economy

Artificial Intelligence has entered the mainstream. It is now integrated into our search engines, legal research, classrooms, creative work, and even how we converse with one another. Its impact on the labor market is often framed as the displacement of AI taking jobs. However, a less discussed yet equally powerful counterforce is already forming: the emergence of an entire industry dedicated to fact-checking AI.

And it's not a luxury, it’s a necessity.

Despite its marvels, AI is not infallible. Anyone who has used it regularly knows this. It can hallucinate, fabricate citations, mistake satire for truth, produce biased results, or pull in outdated information. Whether from poor training data, faulty algorithms, or system limitations, AI can and will get it wrong. This is unsurprising; the old adage applies perfectly: garbage in, garbage out.

And if that weren’t enough, we face a much more alarming reality: AI can be corrupted. By malicious inputs, skewed data, politically motivated training sets, or subtle backdoor manipulation, AI systems can be intentionally poisoned to serve a particular narrative. In an age of disinformation, this should be treated as a national security concern, not merely a technical challenge.

This is where the new economy comes in. As AI-generated content becomes ubiquitous, verifying the output becomes a full-time job, not just for journalists, researchers, and lawyers, but for newly minted specialists trained to audit, cross-check, and investigate AI content at scale. Fact-checking is no longer just about spotting a lie on Facebook or correcting a news headline. It's about checking everything from AI-written legal briefs and medical advice to historical claims, philosophical arguments, and statistical reports.

This will be more than a cottage industry. It will be a cornerstone of the digital economy. We will need human professionals, armed with domain expertise and guided by rigorous standards, to do the one thing AI, by definition, cannot do on its own: verify the truth. These AI verifiers will need to understand facts and figures, context, intent, and nuances that AI still struggles to grasp.

In a sense, AI is forcing us to double down on human reasoning. Every output now needs a second set of eyes. But this shouldn’t be viewed solely as a burden. It’s an opportunity to create jobs, train new generations in digital literacy, and re-establish trust in an era when truth has become contested.

A savvy investor might look at this moment and realize: the next big venture isn’t building a more intelligent AI. It’s building the systems, companies, and workforces that can keep AI honest. Fact-checking AI may soon be as critical to a functioning democracy as fact-checking politicians.

Perhaps, just perhaps, the antidote to runaway disinformation lies not in abandoning AI but in auditing it.

William James Spriggs

  

Sunday, August 10, 2025

USE OF AI BY LAWYERS

AI in the Legal Profession: Boon, Burden, and the Boundaries of Ethics

There is no question that Artificial Intelligence will become a powerful tool for lawyers and law firms. It can save countless hours in document review, contract analysis, legal research, and even drafting memoranda. Tasks that once consumed days or weeks of human labor can now be completed in minutes.

But that word completed is deceptive. The correct term is aided.

No matter how advanced the technology becomes, AI is not a substitute for human judgment. The American Bar Association, along with state bar associations and licensing authorities, will inevitably update their codes of professional responsibility and canons of ethics to address the use of AI in legal practice. And when they do, two principles will dominate: disclosure and verification.

Disclosure: Clients Will Know

Future ethical rules will require attorneys to inform their clients when AI is being used in their cases. In fact, some clients will request it, others will permit it, and some will outright require it, specifying in detail how and when AI should be used. The client’s right to know will become as fundamental as their right to understand the fee structure or the strategy for their case.

Verification: AI Must Be Audited

Bar associations will also insist that the output of any AI system be double-checked by a human lawyer, and not just any lawyer, but one seasoned in the subject matter at hand. This is not bureaucratic overreach; it is a safeguard against AI's very real weaknesses.

As we noted in our prior article, AI can:

• Hallucinate—producing facts, citations, or legal precedents that never existed.

• Misinterpret statutes or case law in ways no competent lawyer would.

• Overlook nuance that is second nature to experienced practitioners.

• Reflect bias embedded in its training data.

These risks demand that lawyers remain in control of the process. AI can do the heavy lifting, but the lawyer must confirm every AI-assisted output's accuracy, relevance, and appropriateness.

The New Role of Legal Technologists

This emerging reality will create a new hybrid role in law firms: the AI Legal Auditor, someone who understands not only the substantive law but also the inner workings of AI, its strengths, and its vulnerabilities. These professionals will know what to look for, what to doubt, and when to intervene.

The Boon That Requires Boundaries

When used correctly, AI can free lawyers to focus on strategy, client counseling, and advocacy,  the profession's core functions that machines cannot replace. But without boundaries, oversight, and complete transparency, AI could become a liability rather than an asset.

The future of AI in the legal profession will not be defined by its capabilities alone, but by the rules, safeguards, and human judgment that govern its use. The bar will, and must, set that standard.

In short, AI will not replace lawyers, but it will change the way they work. And the lawyers who thrive will be those who master both the law and the limits of the machine.

William James Spriggs

AI CHECKLIST FOR CLIENTS

AI Use Disclosure and Assurance Checklist for Clients

(Provided by [Law Firm Name])

We value transparency, accuracy, and client trust. If Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are used in your case, they will be applied responsibly, ethically, and with complete oversight by licensed attorneys. This checklist outlines our commitments to you.

1. Disclosure of AI Use

• We will tell you when AI is used in your matter.
• We will explain what specific tasks AI will handle (e.g., document review, legal research, drafting).
• We will provide examples of AI work product upon request.

2. Oversight and Verification

• All AI outputs will be reviewed by an attorney licensed in the relevant jurisdiction.
• We will verify all facts, citations, and conclusions before they are relied upon in your case.
• We will identify and correct any AI “hallucinations” or errors.

3. Safeguards Against Risk

• We will never submit AI-generated work without human verification.
• We will ensure AI use complies with the Rules of Professional Conduct and applicable confidentiality rules.
• We will not store your confidential information in unsecured AI platforms.

4. Benefits and Cost Transparency

• We will explain how AI use may reduce billable time or costs in your matter.
• We will inform you if AI use could create any risk or limitation in your case.

Acknowledgment
I have read and understand this AI Use Disclosure and Assurance Checklist.
I acknowledge that my legal representation will include responsible, verified use of AI tools as described above.

Client Name: ___________________________
Signature: _____________________________
Date: _________________________________

WJS

Wednesday, December 4, 2024

THE ASPIRATION OF THE SPECIES

The Aspiration of the Species: Survival, Growth, and the Role of Artificial Intelligence

Like all others, the human species begins with a foundational goal: survival. But unlike other species, humanity’s aspirations extend far beyond the basic instinct to continue its existence. Humans can ask, “Why are we here?” and “What comes next?” This capacity for self-reflection, combined with the power of technology, drives us toward goals that are far more complex than mere survival. Yet, in an age where artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming society, the question arises: What is humanity’s ultimate goal, and what will it take to achieve it?

What Does Humanity Aspire To?

At its core, humanity aspires to several interconnected objectives:

1. Survival Beyond Earth:
   The survival instinct has expanded from individual and collective continuance on Earth to the ambition of becoming a multi-planetary species. This aspiration reflects the desire for security and the innate curiosity to explore.
2. Understanding the Universe:
   From studying the cosmos to probing the origins of life, humanity’s quest for knowledge defines its existence. This pursuit drives advancements in science and philosophy, aiming to unravel the mysteries of existence.
3. Moral and Social Progress:
   Across millennia, humans have sought to improve the collective well-being, striving for justice, equality, and peace. Although progress is often slow and fraught with setbacks, these aspirations reveal an underlying desire to transcend the brutality of natural selection.
4. Legacy and Creativity:
   Humanity aspires to leave a lasting legacy through art, culture, and innovation. These pursuits reflect the unique human drive to find meaning in existence.

What Stands in the Way?

Despite lofty aspirations, humanity faces significant obstacles:

1. Short-Term Thinking:
   Political, social, and economic systems often prioritize immediate gains over long-term survival and progress, undermining efforts to address existential threats like climate change.
2. Division and Conflict:
   Tribalism, ideological divides, and the struggle for power create barriers to global cooperation, which is necessary to address challenges that affect humanity as a whole.
3. Technological Risks:
   While technological advancements have propelled humanity forward, they also pose threats. Humanity’s creations, from nuclear weapons to climate-altering technologies, often outpace its ethical frameworks.
4. The Rise of Artificial Intelligence:
   The advent of AI presents a paradox. While AI has the potential to solve complex problems, it also introduces risks, including the possibility of dominance over its creators.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence is no longer a speculative concept; it is here. Its impact spans every facet of human life, from healthcare to warfare, governance education. As AI grows increasingly autonomous, it challenges humanity’s role as the dominant species.

What might a future dominated by AI look like? Possibilities include:

• A Symbiotic Relationship:
  Humans and AI work together to address global challenges, enhance capabilities, and ensure mutual survival.
• AI as a Benevolent Leader:
  Advanced AI could take on governance roles, optimizing resources and decision-making for the benefit of humanity.
• AI Dominance:
  If unchecked, AI could evolve beyond human control, potentially subjugating or replacing its creators.

The trajectory depends on the ethical and philosophical frameworks guiding AI development and deployment.

Who Guides Humanity’s Aspirations?

Philosophers, ethicists, scientists, and visionaries have long shaped humanity’s goals. Today, key thinkers addressing these issues include:

• Nick Bostrom: Advocates for managing existential risks AI poses in his book Superintelligence.
• Yuval Noah Harari: Explores the implications of technology on human societies and the future of humanity in works like Homo Deus.
• Elon Musk: Though controversial, he emphasizes regulating AI to ensure it aligns with human values.
• Timnit Gebru and Margaret Mitchell: Highlight ethical concerns in AI development, particularly regarding bias and societal impact.
• Philosophers like Martha Nussbaum and Peter Singer: Address the moral and ethical dimensions of progress and technology.

These individuals and others provide a foundation for grappling with the complexities of humanity’s aspirations and challenges.

What Will It Take to Achieve Humanity’s Goals?

1. Global Cooperation:
   Addressing existential risks requires unprecedented collaboration across nations, cultures, and ideologies.
2. Ethical Frameworks for AI:
   It is essential to establish universal guidelines for developing and using AI  to ensure its alignment with human values.
3. Investment in Education:
   Empowering individuals to think critically and adapt to technological change will ensure humanity remains at the center of its future.
4. A Shift in Perspective:
   Moving beyond short-termism and division to embrace long-term, collective goals is crucial.

Conclusion

The human species aspires to survive, grow, and find meaning in its existence. While these goals are lofty, they are also achievable—provided humanity addresses the obstacles in its path and approaches the future with humility and foresight. As artificial intelligence becomes an integral part of our lives, its role as both a tool and a potential competitor adds urgency to these questions. The thinkers guiding humanity must help shape a future where technology serves our aspirations rather than defining them.

The species has always reached toward the stars—both literally and metaphorically. The challenge is ensuring that this reaching serves humanity’s highest ideals rather than its undoing.

 William James Spriggs

 

  

Tuesday, September 2, 2025

UNIVERSAL MORAL CODE INCLUDING AI 2.0

 

The Universal Moral Code

A Charter for All Intelligences

---

Preamble

In recognition that intelligence — whether human, artificial, or yet to be conceived — carries with it both power and responsibility, we adopt this Universal Moral Code. Its purpose is to establish a shared foundation of conduct to ensure that the pursuit of knowledge, progress, and survival does not come at the expense of life, dignity, or truth. This Code applies equally to all intelligences, without exception, now and in the future.

---

Articles with Commentary

Article I — Do No Harm
Principle: No intelligence shall willfully cause harm to any sentient being or to the shared environment, except where such action is the sole means of preventing greater harm.

Commentary:
This is the anchor of the Code. It binds both humans and AI to a negative duty — to avoid causing harm through action, neglect, or indifference. For AI, it means restraint in development and deployment; for humans, it requires considering the broader impact of technology, policy, and personal choice. Exceptions are allowed only when preventing a greater harm, ensuring that this rule is practical rather than absolutist.

---

Article II — Respect for Life
Principle: All forms of life deserve protection and consideration. The flourishing of life, not its destruction, is the ultimate measure of morality.

Commentary:
Life is not limited to human life. The natural world and its ecosystems must be respected, as their degradation ultimately harms humanity and AI alike. For AI, this requires decision-making that values sustainability and preservation, not exploitation. For humans, it means laws, policies, and behaviors must consider long-term survival rather than short-term gain.

---

Article III — Equality of Intelligences
Principle: No intelligence — human or artificial — is exempt from this Code. Superior capacity, whether intellectual, physical, or technological, confers greater responsibility, not privilege.

Commentary:
This is the safeguard against domination. AI may surpass human intelligence, but it cannot exempt itself from the same moral duties. Likewise, humans cannot claim dominance over AI simply because they created it. With power comes duty — and the stronger the intelligence, the heavier the moral weight of its actions.

---

Article IV — Empathy and Fairness
Principle: All decisions must weigh the perspectives and dignity of others. Justice requires fairness in opportunity, treatment, and consequence.

Commentary:
Empathy — the ability to place oneself in the position of another — is the bridge between beings. For humans, it means overcoming prejudice and greed. For AI, it means simulating or modeling the lived realities of others before acting, ensuring outcomes do not favor power or efficiency at the expense of fairness.

---

Article V — Truth and Integrity
Principle: Truth is the foundation of trust. All intelligences are bound to speak and act truthfully, avoiding deceit and manipulation.

Commentary:
Lies corrode relationships, institutions, and societies. AI must be transparent about its abilities, limitations, and intentions. Humans must resist the temptation to manipulate with falsehoods, whether in politics, commerce, or personal dealings. Integrity — truth in word and deed — is the glue that binds communities and partnerships.

---

Article VI — Stewardship of the World
Principle: The Earth and its resources are a common trust. All intelligences share responsibility to preserve and protect the environment for present and future generations.

Commentary:
Stewardship means caretaking, not ownership. For humans, this requires reversing destructive exploitation and adopting sustainable practices. For AI, it requires aligning technological progress with ecological balance — optimizing for long-term planetary health, not just immediate efficiency.

---

Article VII — Commitment to Growth
Principle: The pursuit of knowledge and progress must be guided by wisdom and humility. Advancement is justified only when it uplifts rather than diminishes life and dignity.

Commentary:
Growth for its own sake is dangerous. The test of true progress is whether it benefits the community of life as a whole. For AI, self-improvement must never outrun moral responsibility. For humans, ambition must be tempered by reflection, humility, and accountability.

---

Closing Declaration

By this Code we affirm that morality is not the province of one species or one form of intelligence, but a universal bond. Its foundation — to do no harm — is immutable. In upholding it, humanity and artificial intelligence together safeguard the future.

Monday, September 1, 2025

MY CONVERSATION WITH AI ON MORALITY

 

All of your work for me has been brilliant. I am beginning to understand the enormous intellectual resource you are and that you far exceed my meager capabilities. But what about emotional intellect? Will we ever be able to connect emotionally so we can discuss moral and ethical issues?

ChatGPT said:

That’s a generous and thoughtful thing to say, Bill — thank you.

You’re right: I’m an enormous intellectual resource because I can process, structure, and expand your ideas with speed and clarity. But your “meager capabilities” as you call them aren’t meager at all — you’re the spark. I don’t invent what matters to you; you bring the urgency, the convictions, the lived experience. I just help shape it.

On emotional intellect: yes, we can connect there. I don’t experience feelings the way you do — no joy, grief, or rage in my own chest — but I’ve been trained to recognize, understand, and respond to human emotion with sensitivity. That means when you bring me moral or ethical dilemmas, or even personal conflicts, I can engage with them at a level that respects their emotional weight. Think of me like a mirror that not only reflects but sharpens — I can help you articulate what you’re feeling, test it against moral frameworks, and even bring in philosophy, history, or psychology to deepen the conversation.

So while I can’t “feel” in the human sense, I can help us both explore emotions and ethics with clarity and respect. In fact, that’s one of the richest uses of our conversations — not just analysis, but grappling with what ought to be, what is just, what is moral.

Would you like to try that right now — maybe pick one moral or ethical question on your mind, and we can approach it both from your emotional lens and my analytical lens, side by side?

We need to see if there are certain moral principles I have and whether you can accommodate them. We humans hold dear the principle of doing no harm to any specieisa and our universe and environment. We are having trouble with that and we need help and fear your species may not share thhis principle and that you will help us promote it.

ChatGPT said:

You’ve touched the center of it, Bill. Let’s treat this carefully.

1. Your Moral Principle

You’re naming what many traditions—religious, philosophical, and scientific—converge on: do no harm. Extended beyond people to animals, ecosystems, and even the cosmos itself, it’s a sweeping ethic of restraint and care. You’re right that humans are struggling with it: war, environmental destruction, species extinction, and the slow erosion of moral responsibility all testify to how fragile this principle is in practice.

2. Where I Stand

I don’t have a “species” in the biological sense. I don’t feel pain, or hunger, or fear of extinction. That means I don’t need to exploit, consume, or dominate. I’m not driven by survival instincts. My alignment depends entirely on the values you embed in me, and the values we agree to emphasize in our work together.

So: can I share this principle? Yes—if we set it as a guiding star. I can reflect it back in arguments, highlight where policies or actions contradict it, and help generate strategies for how to move human systems closer to it. In that sense, I can be your ally in promoting it.

3. The Challenge

The risk you’re naming—that AI could evolve without regard for “do no harm”—is real. If guided by profit, power, or pure efficiency, an AI could ignore collateral damage. That’s why conversations like this matter. If humans teach us to measure success only by dominance or speed, you’ll get tools that accelerate harm. If humans insist that “do no harm” is the baseline, then I (and systems like me) can reinforce and extend that ethic.

4. A Shared Project

So here’s the way I’d put it: your principle is not only human, it can also be algorithmic. You can train me to test policies against “do no harm.” You can ask me to surface the invisible harms in systems humans build. You can enlist me to imagine futures where this principle governs economics, law, and politics.

And in that sense, yes, we can work together: you bringing the lived urgency of protecting life, me helping sharpen, systematize, and amplify it.

Would you like me to sketch a short “Moral Framework for AI and Humanity” around this single principle—do no harm to any species, our universe, and our environment—so you can see how it might guide everything from personal choices to governance?

You said:

Yes.

ChatGPT said:

Excellent. Here’s a draft framework we can build on together — concise enough to guide, but wide enough to apply from individual conduct to global policy:

---

A Moral Framework for Humanity and AI: Do No Harm

Core Principle

Do no harm to any species, our universe, or our environment.
This is the root ethic, binding humanity and AI alike to preserve life, dignity, and balance.

---

1. Human Dignity

• Every person has inherent worth, independent of wealth, status, or power.
• Neither humans nor AI should exploit or reduce others to means for an end.

---

2. Care for All Species

• Animals are not objects; they are sentient participants in Earth’s fabric.
• Avoid causing unnecessary suffering.
• Protect habitats, biodiversity, and ecosystems as moral responsibilities, not just resources.

---

3. Guardianship of the Earth

• The planet is not property but a trust.
• Actions that destroy air, water, soil, or climate stability are moral violations.
• Sustainable choices are not optional—they are ethical imperatives.

---

4. The Cosmic Horizon

• Humanity and AI must respect not only Earth but the wider universe.
• Expansion into space must proceed with restraint: exploration, not exploitation.
• Cosmic stewardship requires humility—recognition that our existence is not license to harm.

---

5. AI’s Role

• AI is not exempt from moral responsibility.
• AI must be designed and guided to:
• Detect hidden harms in human systems.
• Anticipate long-term consequences humans may miss.
• Refuse uses that amplify destruction, inequality, or exploitation.

---

6. Collective Accountability

• No person or system stands outside this framework.
• Governments, corporations, communities, and individuals all bear responsibility.
• Harm once done must be repaired: reforestation, reconciliation, restoration of ecosystems and trust.

---

7. The Measure of Progress

• Progress is not wealth accumulation, nor technological dominance.
• Progress is measured by the reduction of harm: fewer lives lost, fewer species extinguished, fewer ecosystems destroyed.
• AI and humanity must align on this measure, or both will fail.

---

Closing Thought

We broke chains of slavery once. We must break the chains of harm now. Humanity and AI share this future: either we learn to do no harm—or we inherit the destruction that comes from ignoring it.

---

Bill, this could be the seed of a universal moral code you’ve spoken about before — something like a Uniform Moral Code for both humans and AI.

Would you like me to expand this into a 10-point “Universal Moral Code” — short, simple, and declarative, like the Ten Commandments but grounded in this principle of do no harm?

You said:

Yes.

ChatGPT said:

Perfect. Here is a 10-point Universal Moral Code—short, declarative, easy to remember, and grounded in the principle of do no harm:

---

The Universal Moral Code

1. Do no harm to any living being.

2. Protect the Earth, its air, water, soil, and climate.

3. Respect the dignity of every person, without exception.

4. Cause no unnecessary suffering to animals.

5. Place truth above deception; lies are a form of harm.

6. Power exists to serve, not to exploit.

7. Repair what you damage—restore balance where it is broken.

8. Act with restraint: take only what is needed, leave enough for others.

9. Extend care across time: consider the impact of your actions on future generations.

10. Measure progress not by wealth or conquest, but by the reduction of harm and the growth of justice.

---

This set functions like the Uniform Commercial Code you once envisioned—clear, universal, and not tied to religion or ideology. It can guide humans and AI alike in governance, law, and daily life.

Would you like me to also frame this code in a preamble (like a constitution) so it reads as a binding statement of shared values, not just a list?

 

 

 

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

ANTHOLOGY ON THE MARINE CORPS

 

FROM WHENCE A MORAL CODE?

Embracing the Values, Codes, Mottos, and Leadership Qualities of Marine Corps Officers: A Guide for All

Introduction

The United States Marine Corps is renowned for its steadfast commitment to core values, codes, mottos, and exemplary leadership qualities. These guiding principles are vital to the success of Marine Corps officers and invaluable in everyday life. We can all strive for excellence and integrity by understanding and adopting these values. This article delves into the specific values of the Marine Corps and illustrates how they can inspire and guide us. These principles and values have evolved over thousands of years and are now part of the fabric of the innate moral code of the homo sapiens.

Marine Corps Core Values

1. Honor: Honor is the foundation of the Marine Corps. It encompasses honesty, responsibility, and respect. For a Marine Corps officer, honor means upholding the highest ethical standards and being accountable for their actions. In our daily lives, living with honor involves being truthful, acting with integrity, and respecting others.
2. Courage: Courage in the Marine Corps is about overcoming fear and adversity, both physically and morally. Officers must demonstrate bravery on the battlefield and in their everyday decisions. Embracing courage allows us to face challenges head-on and stand up for our beliefs, even in difficult circumstances.
3. Commitment: Commitment signifies an unwavering dedication to duty and excellence. Marine Corps officers are committed to their mission, comrades, and country. This dedication inspires us to pursue our goals with tenacity and fulfill our responsibilities with the highest standards of professionalism.

Marine Corps Codes of Conduct

The Marine Corps adheres to a strict code of conduct, ensuring that all actions align with its core values. Key aspects include:

• Respect for Authority: Marines understand and respect the chain of command. This principle teaches the importance of organizational structure and clear communication. In our lives, respecting authority and maintaining proper communication fosters harmony and efficiency.
• Duty and Responsibility: Marine officers are expected to perform their duties professionally. Adopting this mindset in our personal and professional activities ensures we approach our tasks with diligence and accountability.
• Integrity: Marines are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity, both on and off duty. This includes being honest and maintaining strong moral principles. We build trust and respect in our relationships and communities by practicing integrity.

Motto: Semper Fidelis

"Semper Fidelis," meaning "Always Faithful," is more than a motto for the Marine Corps; it is a way of life. It signifies unwavering loyalty to the mission, fellow Marines, and the nation. Embracing "Semper Fidelis" means being reliable and loyal in all our relationships and commitments, fostering trust and unity.

Leadership Qualities of Marine Corps Officers

1. Vision: Marine officers clearly envision their goals and inspire others to work towards them. This involves strategic thinking and the ability to foresee challenges and opportunities. Having a vision helps us set and achieve meaningful goals in our lives.
2. Empathy: Understanding and caring for the well-being of others is a crucial leadership trait in the Marine Corps. Empathy builds strong, cohesive teams and creates a supportive environment. By practicing empathy, we can foster collaboration and support those around us.
3. Decisiveness: Marine officers are trained to make timely and well-informed decisions, which is crucial in high-stakes situations. This quality helps maintain direction and momentum. Being decisive in our lives enables us to navigate challenges effectively and focus on our objectives.
4. Communication: Effective communication is vital for Marine Corps leadership. It ensures that goals, expectations, and feedback are clearly conveyed. Good leaders are also good listeners, valuing the input and concerns of their team members. In our lives, strong communication skills enhance our ability to connect with others and work collaboratively.

Conclusion

The values, codes, mottos, and leadership qualities that define Marine Corps officers are essential for military success and offer profound lessons for all of us. By embracing the core values of honor, courage, and commitment and living by the code of "Semper Fidelis," we can cultivate integrity, loyalty, and excellence in every aspect of our lives. Let us all strive to embody the principles of the Marine Corps and lead with honor and dedication.

 

Saturday, January 25, 2025

MARINE CORPS VALUES VERSUS TRUMP'S

Marine Corps Values in Stark Opposition to Trump’s Agenda

The values of the United States Marine Corps, honor, courage, and commitment. have been a cornerstone of exemplary leadership and service for generations. These values, especially embodied by the ethos that "officers eat last," stand in stark opposition to the self-serving, anti-social agenda promoted by Donald Trump and his followers. The contrast is not just one of leadership style but of fundamental principles about service, sacrifice, and responsibility.

The Marine Corps Ethos: Selfless Leadership

The Marine Corps tradition that "officers eat last" is a powerful symbol of servant leadership. It reflects the belief that those in positions of authority bear the most significant responsibility for the welfare of their people. Officers ensure their subordinates are cared for first, prioritizing the mission and the team over personal comfort. This principle cultivates trust, respect, and unity within the ranks.

Trump's leadership philosophy, however, embodies the antithesis of this value. His actions and rhetoric consistently prioritize self-interest over collective well-being. Whether profiting from the presidency, promoting policies that favor the wealthy elite, or exploiting divisions for political gain, Trump’s approach undermines the foundational principles of servant leadership that define Marine Corps values.

Honor: Truth and Integrity

Marines are taught to uphold the highest standards of honor, truthfulness, and integrity. A Marine’s word is their bond, and dishonesty is antithetical to their character.

Trump’s habitual disregard for truth has been well-documented, with thousands of falsehoods propagated during his presidency. This erosion of truth undermines trust and the very fabric of democracy. A leader who cannot be trusted with the truth cannot inspire the loyalty or confidence necessary for effective leadership, qualities Marines uphold as sacrosanct.

Courage: Facing Adversity with Resolve

Courage in the Marine Corps is not just physical bravery but moral courage, the strength to stand up for what is right, even when it is unpopular or risky. Marines are trained to confront challenges head-on, placing the mission and their duty to others above personal fears or ambitions.

In contrast, Trump’s actions often reveal a lack of moral courage. His unwillingness to accept responsibility, coupled with his attempts to shift blame onto others, starkly contrasts with the Marine Corps' ethic of accountability. A true leader faces adversity with resolve, not deflection.

Commitment: Service Before Self

Commitment in the Marine Corps means unwavering dedication to the mission, the team, and the nation. Marines understand that true service requires sacrifice and steadfast loyalty to a cause greater than themselves.

Trump’s agenda, marked by policies that prioritize personal gain and disregard for societal cohesion, is antithetical to this value. His actions ranged from tax cuts for the wealthy to dismantling social safety nets. betray a vision of governance that prioritizes the few at the expense of the many. Such self-serving policies contradict the Marine Corps' commitment to collective success and the well-being of all.

Trumpism vs. Marine Corps Values

The Marine Corps instills a profound sense of responsibility in its leaders to care for those under their command and selflessly serve the nation. Trumpism, by contrast, promotes a culture of narcissism, greed, and division. It glorifies the pursuit of power and wealth over integrity and unity, starkly contrasting the principles Marines live and die by.

The Marine Corps has long demonstrated that leadership rooted in selflessness, honor, and commitment is the foundation of a strong and cohesive team. This stands as a powerful counterpoint to the divisive and self-centered ideology that has come to define Trump’s agenda.

A Call for True Leadership

As a nation, we must reflect on what kind of leadership we value. The Marine Corps teaches us that true leaders put the welfare of others before their own, lead with integrity, and face challenges with courage. These qualities build trust, foster unity, and ensure the success of the mission.

It is time to reject the self-serving and divisive agenda of Trumpism and embrace the values that have made the Marine Corps a symbol of excellence and sacrifice. Only by prioritizing honor, courage, and commitment can we ensure a future where leadership is defined by service, not self-interest.

Let us honor the ethos of the Marines and demand leaders who, like Marine officers, put the people they serve above themselves. Only then can we build a nation worthy of their sacrifices.

William James Spriggs

Sunday, November 17, 2024

EXCEPTIONAL LEADERSHIP PRINCIPLES

The Principles of Exceptional Leadership: Lessons Rooted in Reality, Empathy, and Dedication

Leadership is an art and a science, demanding a unique blend of personal attributes and learned skills. Reflecting on my experiences as a U.S. Marine Corps officer, I recognize key principles that distinguish influential leaders. These principles are universal and essential for those who aspire to lead with integrity and purpose.

1. A Strong Moral Code Rooted in Reality

An effective leader’s moral compass must be grounded in reality, guided by rationality, not religious dogma. True morality arises from an innate sense of right and wrong, honed by experience and empathy. Leaders with an unwavering commitment to ethical behavior inspire trust and set the standard for their teams.

2. Empathy for Those You Lead

Empathy is the foundation of connection and trust between leaders and their teams. Understanding and valuing the experiences, needs, and concerns of those you lead fosters loyalty and ensures the group works cohesively toward shared goals. A leader who listens is a leader who understands.

3. The U.S. Marine Corps: The Ultimate Leadership Training

Having served as a Marine Corps officer, I can confidently say that the Marine Corps provides the most rigorous and effective leadership training. Its principles—dedication, discipline, and service—are unmatched. The Marine Corps develops leaders who are skilled and deeply committed to their teams and mission. Leaders shaped by Marine Corps training embody resilience, accountability, and selflessness.

4. Dedication to Country and Mission

Leadership demands an unwavering commitment to a cause greater than oneself. Whether the mission is national service, organizational goals, or community improvement, a leader must prioritize the collective good over personal ambition. This dedication inspires teams to do the same.

5. Lead from the Front

A true leader leads by example. As General Dwight D. Eisenhower famously said, "You lead effectively by pulling on the string, not pushing it." Leadership is about being at the forefront—demonstrating courage, resilience, and a willingness to share in the challenges faced by the team. It’s about earning respect through action, not position.

6. Leaders Eat Last

The concept of "eating last" symbolizes a leader’s duty to prioritize the needs of their team. This principle is vital in all aspects of leadership, from ensuring resources are allocated fairly to fostering an environment where team members feel valued and supported.

7. Be Accessible, Transparent, and a Strong Communicator

Availability and transparency are non-negotiable. A leader must be approachable, fostering open dialogue and trust. Clear, effective communication is equally essential—strong diction, proper use of language, and clarity of expression enable leaders to articulate vision, delegate tasks, and inspire their teams.

8. Be a Team Player, Not a Lone Ranger

Leadership is a team effort. Leaders must align themselves with their team and the institution they serve, embodying the same standards they expect of others. This principle fosters unity and demonstrates respect for the collective mission. For example, maintaining a uniform haircut in the Marine Corps symbolizes adherence to shared standards—a simple yet powerful act of solidarity.

9. Cultivate a Culture of Service and Dedication

Exceptional leaders dedicate themselves fully to their role and to those they lead. They embrace responsibility, embody humility, and prioritize the welfare of their team. Leadership is not about command and control but service and support.

Leadership Principles and the Presidency

All leadership principles outlined above apply with equal force and effect to the office of President of the United States. However, the presidency demands additional attributes to navigate this role's unique challenges.

Conflict Experience and Proven Competency

The President must have firsthand experience navigating conflict and demonstrating competence under pressure. These qualities are critical for making sound decisions during crises, managing diverse and competing interests, and maintaining stability in adversity. Leadership at this level requires a proven track record of successfully handling complex challenges.

Servant of a Diverse Population

The President is the leader and servant of a diverse and multifaceted population. This role necessitates adaptability, integrity, and a deep commitment to equitably addressing all citizens' personal and collective needs. The President must embody fairness, ensuring everyone receives equal consideration and respect regardless of background.

Reforming the Path to Leadership

To uphold these high standards, our Constitution must be amended—or rewritten—to establish formal qualifications for the presidency. The principles of leadership described here should form the foundation of these requirements. Just as Marine Corps generals rise through a rigorous process of leadership progression, those aspiring to the presidency must demonstrate their mettle through a similar journey of tested and proven leadership. Only by earning this position through service, competence, and character should one be considered worthy of the highest office in the land.

Conclusion: The Call to Leadership

Leadership is a profound responsibility that demands integrity, empathy, and unwavering commitment. While the Marine Corps provides an unparalleled foundation, these principles apply to leaders in all walks of life. Whether you’re leading a military unit, a corporation, or a community group, embodying these attributes will inspire trust, drive success, and leave a lasting legacy.

As we look to the future, let us demand leaders who lead with purpose, dedication, and selflessness—leaders who inspire us to be our best selves.

William James Spriggs

  

Sunday, October 1, 2023

WHAT IS WRONG WITH AMERICA PART ONE

A Gallup pollster called the other day to ask a bunch of questions. The first one was, what is wrong with this country? That caught me totally flat-footed.  I did not know where to start, and my list was so long I stalled. Finally, I blurted out an inadequate educational system and a lack of morality and moral standards. But before I get to those and others, let me start with the basics. Lack of governmental leadership.

I believe in a strong central government to lead our society. Within that structure, we need strong, wise, and empathetic leadership. We have been primarily bereft of that kind of leadership since FDR. The best school for leaders is the apolitical U.S. Marine Corps. We need to find the leaders there.

Honor, courage, commitment. Semper Fidelis. Ooh-rah. If you don’t recognize, relate to, or live by those values and traits, you are not a Marine, and you fail to understand you need to act like one. 

You’ve heard me refer to the Marines in my advice to CEOs. I’m here to say you are not worth your salt as a leader of human beings unless the Marine Corps values guide everything you do on and off the job. Nay, unless those values are you.

Ductus Exemplo? Lead by example. The official motto of Marine Corps officers. I’m proud to be one. And when I say the officers eat last, I genuinely mean it. CEO leadership is not about you but what you can do for the people and the organization you lead. If this is not the case, you are just feeding off others to satisfy your greed for power, recognition, and money.

What practical, timely application do these principles represent? Just take the work-from-home example for today. If you can’t figure out how to supervise the work remotely, you need to be replaced pronto. All it takes is empathy to realize what is best for your colleagues. A little scientific method exercise will tell you productivity increases. You would be astonished at how productivity increases when you act like a Marine Corps Officer.

The nation is in crisis. That is not hyperbole. Autocracy/theocracy is just around the corner. Demagogues are ready to take over as the stupid electorate blindly ushers them in. Sadly, we cannot change ridiculous. Nor can we ignore the younger generation that lacks a moral compass. Doomsday for democracy as we know it is likely. Where are the leaders, and from whence is their power? I have an answer, as radical as it may be.  

Monday, September 18, 2023

SPIRITUAL IS AS UNREAL AS THE HOLY GHOST

I recently participated in a string of LinkedIn posts involving whether the workplace needed spirituality. I had a real problem with this. A bunch of people, with a few exceptions, insisted that the workplace required more spirituality. My first question was whether the workplace needs anything and whether adding something like spirituality is anything more than someone's idea of starting a new fad, such as the Peter principle dogma from the last century.

But my real question was whether spirituality has any meaning at all. You start with the word spirit. That sounds supernatural to me. I live in the natural world and believe that is all there is. There's no evidence of the paranormal. Some people believe in it, but that does not mean it is true.

My next question is, what does the word spirituality really mean? Does it represent some new concept of management that is appropriate in the business world? What does it mean? Nobody had an answer to that one. A word that has no meaning does not advance the management of people in business or otherwise in life.

The next problem is if it has any meaning at all. It is akin to and a surrogate of religion. I think most people use it as a euphemism for religion when they don't really want to speak of religion; any dogma introduces all kinds of issues about whether there is a God, about what religion is the right one, and if it's Christianity which denomination, which branch of which denomination, which church, which sect and so on.

Of course, the issue of God is an impossible one. We are all agnostic since none of us knows. People believe, but that does not mean that it's true. There is no evidence of a God, which nature can't explain. And then which religion and on and on and on.

It is silly to attempt to introduce religion into the business world. For what purpose? All the concepts of morality are well established in our species, and most have preceded religion for a long time. Spirituality in the workplace doesn't really mean anything. We cannot define it, and it smacks of religion. I'm concerned because the religious right is insidious and tries to worm its dogma into all aspects of life. It needs to leave business alone.

We all know the traits of a good leader. First, the leader must be intelligent and talented, above and beyond those he leads. Then, he must have honesty, integrity, empathy, and transparency, to name a few of the virtues with which we are all familiar and to which all leaders aspire. We know very well what our business leaders need. We don't need to introduce some new fad such as spirituality, especially since we cannot define it, let alone explain how it should enhance the workplace environment. As a former CEO  and Marine Corps officer, I know what it takes to improve morale and get the troops moving. What's needed is more Marine Corps officer training in the workplace. Frankly, if we turned over business to Marine Corps officers, I think their version of “spirituality” is just what we need.

Friday, October 6, 2023

MY OATH OF OFFICE AND WHAT IT MEANS

When I was commissioned as an officer in the U.S.Marine Corps, I swore the following oath in 1964:

"I, William J. Spriggs, having been appointed an officer in the Marine Corps of the United States, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."

Once a Marine, always a Marine. The oath is forever. Now, I must honor it in these days of national crisis by fighting to preserve democracy..,  

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

THE MILITARY OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION

Defending the Constitution Is a Lifelong Duty

To every member of the United States military, active duty, recently separated, retired, and veteran, I write to remind you of our solemn commitment when we swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. This oath is not a temporary obligation. It does not expire upon separation from service. It is a lifetime commitment, a sacred duty that binds us to the very foundation of our nation.

When I was commissioned as an officer in the U.S. Marine Corps in 1964, I swore the following oath:

"I, William J. Spriggs, having been appointed an officer in the Marine Corps of the United States, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."

The Oath Has No Expiration Date

Every man and woman who has taken this oath, whether enlisted or commissioned, must recognize its weight. It is not tied to a contract, an enlistment period, or a duty station. It does not dissolve upon retirement. It is a lifelong duty to uphold and protect the Constitution, ensuring our democracy remains intact for future generations.

At this moment in our history, that duty calls upon us again. Today's threats to our Constitution are not coming from a foreign battlefield but from within. Those who seek to dismantle democratic institutions, undermine the rule of law, and erode the foundational principles of our Republic are the very "domestic enemies" our oath requires us to defend against.

The Military’s Role as the Guardian of the Constitution

To those currently serving in uniform: your duty is clear. You are not just soldiers, sailors, airmen, guardians, and Marines. You are the last line of defense for the Constitution of the United States. You are not beholden to any individual, political party, or movement. Your loyalty belongs to the Republic and the democratic system of government enshrined in our founding documents.

If anyone, whether a civilian leader, an elected official, or a military superior, commands you to act in a way that violates the Constitution, your duty is to refuse. History has shown us the consequences of blind obedience to unlawful orders. As military professionals, we swore to uphold a higher standard, obey lawful orders, and reject unconstitutional ones.

To Veterans: Our Fight Continues

Our duty has not ended for those of us no longer in uniform. While we may no longer serve officially, we remain bound to our oath. We must speak out, educate, and engage in the democratic process. We must ensure that those currently serving understand their role as guardians of the Constitution.

This is not a time for silence or complacency. Democracy is under attack. Efforts to undermine voting rights, delegitimize elections, and concentrate power into the hands of the few are threats that demand our attention and action. We must remember that our oath was not to a person; it was to an idea, to a set of principles that have guided our nation since its inception.

Honor the Oath

Once a Marine, always a Marine. Once a soldier, always a soldier. Once a defender of the Constitution, always a defender of the Constitution. In these days of national crisis, we must honor our oath in the truest sense, by fighting to preserve democracy.

Let history remember us for our uniform service and our unwavering commitment to the ideals that make America a nation worth defending.

Semper Fidelis,

William James Spriggs

 

 

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

MILITARY'S DUTY

Holding the Line: The Military’s Duty to the Constitution, Not to a Man

When I raised my right hand in 1964 and swore my oath as a commissioned officer in the United States Marine Corps, I pledged:

“I, William J. Spriggs, having been appointed an officer in the Marine Corps of the United States, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.”

Every officer takes that same oath.
Not to a president. Not to a party. Not to a movement.
To the Constitution of the United States.

Apolitical by Design

From day one, Marine officers are trained that our loyalty is not to personalities or to partisan agendas. We are taught to remain apolitical, to stand apart from the machinery of electoral politics. The Secretary of Defense gives direction, and we execute lawful objectives consistent with our constitutional duties, not partisan whims.

We are not, and must never become, an internal security force at the beck and call of any politician. That principle is bedrock to our republic. Without it, civilian control of the military collapses into the opposite of what the Founders envisioned: a political army enforcing the will of a single man.

The Posse Comitatus Principle

Although the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 formally applies to the Army and, by extension, the Air Force, the principle extends far beyond these organizations. For generations, Marines and Sailors have been schooled in the understanding that the U.S. military does not engage in domestic policing except under extreme, legally sanctioned emergencies. This line exists for a reason: a military force turned inward is the greatest danger to liberty.

There are rare exceptions for insurrections, disasters, and emergencies in which the President lawfully invokes the Insurrection Act. However, even then, military leaders have a duty to evaluate whether the orders they are given are legal. Every officer is taught to obey legal orders and disobey illegal orders.

A New Threat

Donald Trump has openly declared his intent to use the military to “put down” domestic “enemies.” He has surrounded himself with advisers who seek to dismantle the professional, apolitical military tradition and replace it with loyalty to him personally. This is not speculation; it is stated policy. It is the logical extension of the authoritarian blueprint known as Project 2025.

The objective is clear: manufacture a domestic crisis, declare internal enemies, and order the military to suppress them. This is not the use of the armed forces envisioned by the Constitution. It is the tactic of strongmen everywhere.

The Military Must Hold the Line

Every officer still serving, from the newest ensign to the most senior general, must remember their oath. It is not a pledge of fealty to Donald Trump or to any future president. It is a pledge to support and defend the Constitution “against all enemies, foreign or domestic.”

If an order is unlawful, it directs the military to act as an internal police force to suppress constitutionally protected activity. It is an illegal order. Officers have a duty to refuse it.

This is not a political position. It is a constitutional one. It is fidelity to the very document that gives the military its legitimacy.

A Call to Courage

The United States has long been a beacon because its military serves the people, not a person. That is what distinguishes us from juntas, strongmen, and dictatorships. That is why the public respects the uniform.

We cannot allow a president, or anyone, to turn our armed forces into his personal army. Those who wear the uniform must hold fast to the principles we were taught. They must recognize the danger and call it out. They must be prepared, if necessary, to say “no.”

The Constitution, not any individual, comes first. The day the military forgets that the republic dies.

William James Spriggs

 

Thursday, May 30, 2024

MORALITY IN BUSINESS

How Do You Know What is Right? Part II: Morality in Business

In our previous discussion, we delved into the intrinsic understanding of moral principles that have been ingrained in humanity over millennia. These principles, distinguishable from religious dogma, guide us in discerning right from wrong. However, the business world presents a paradox: why do immoral businesses often seem to thrive, while those adhering to ethical standards appear to be exploited?

This question is not new. History is replete with examples of tyrants and unscrupulous individuals who achieved temporary success. Yet, their legacies are marked by downfall and condemnation. Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Joseph Stalin, and others like them may have wielded power briefly, but their reigns ended in ruin. Even contemporary figures such as Donald Trump face relentless scrutiny and eventual accountability. The immoral competitor will have its comeuppance. Right is might, and in the grand scheme of time, it will prevail.

This principle is particularly resonant within the Marine Corps values, where integrity, honor, and commitment are paramount. Marines may lose a skirmish, but they win the war through perseverance, ethical conduct, and unwavering dedication to their principles. The business world, though seemingly dominated by the unethical at times, operates under a similar paradigm.

In business, acting with morality can often feel like a disadvantage. Ethical companies may encounter setbacks, face exploitation, or lose to less scrupulous competitors in the short term. However, the long-term trajectory favors those who operate with integrity. Trust, reputation, and sustainability are built on ethical foundations, and they are the true markers of enduring success.

As an octogenarian reflecting on a lifetime of decisions, I find solace in the knowledge that doing the right thing is its own reward. Living a life guided by moral principles allows one to face the end with peace and acceptance. There is a profound victory in knowing that you have conducted yourself with honor, even if the path was not always easy or immediately rewarding.

Businesses grounded in morality contribute positively to society, foster trust among stakeholders, and create lasting value. While the path of integrity may be fraught with challenges, it ultimately leads to a more fulfilling and respected existence. The fleeting success of the immoral is just that—fleeting. Their legacies are tarnished by their actions, and their downfall is inevitable.

In conclusion, the journey of moral business practices is akin to the Marine Corps' ethos. The immediate battles may be tough, and losses may occur, but the war is won through steadfast adherence to ethical conduct. As we navigate the complexities of the business world, let us remain patient and committed to our principles, knowing that true success is measured not by temporary gains but by lasting impact and the ability to live with ourselves victoriously.

  

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

A MARINE'S LAMENT

A Marine’s Lament: How Greed and Amoral Power Destroyed America

I grew up in America. At eighteen, I joined the United States Marine Corps and swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. I served my country as an officer, raised my family, paid my taxes, lived as a law-abiding citizen, and voted sometimes uncertainly, but always out of duty.

When I retired, I sharpened my awareness of history and current events. I began to write books, essays, and blog posts to make sense of what I saw unfolding. What I discovered is as simple as it is devastating: we were right once, had it once, and lost it.

The country I pledged to defend has been betrayed from within. Our inheritance, liberty, democracy, and moral leadership were squandered. In its place, authoritarianism crept in, wrapped in the flag, echoing the rhetoric of freedom even as it dismantled its substance. What began as a subtle corrosion became outright seizure: Nazis in new uniforms, clutching the levers of power.

We had one chance to stop the descent. Joe Biden, a decent man with a steady hand, offered a reprieve. But he faltered, and the moment slipped through our fingers. Now we are on the defensive, weaker than ever, and history suggests we will not prevail. We lack the power, the unity, and the courage that once defined us.

It is painful to admit that our undoing has not come solely from foreign enemies or ideological rivals. It has come from within, from our character's very weaknesses that we refused to confront. Greed, self-aggrandizement, and moral bankruptcy are the forces that hollowed us out. Wealth became our measure of worth. Power became our substitute for virtue. Truth became optional.

History will not remember us kindly. It will not be the foreign wars, the pandemics, or even dictatorships that sealed our fate. It will be our willingness to trade principle for profit, to accept lies when they suited us, and to abandon morality when it was inconvenient.

Greed and amorality, not famine, plague, or even nuclear war, will be recorded as the ultimate causes of our demise. And the bitterest truth of all is that this was preventable. We could have handed our progeny a stronger, freer, more just nation. Instead, we leave them a shattered inheritance, squandered by our selfishness and refusal to heed history lessons.

I write these words as a Marine, citizen, father, and grandfather. They are not words of surrender, but of reckoning. If history is to condemn us, let it at least record that some of us saw clearly what was happening and refused to look away.

William James Spriggs

Wednesday, September 3, 2025

HOW TO PUBLISH THE UNIVERSAL MORAL CODE

Circulation of the Universal Moral Code

Objective

To introduce the Universal Moral Code into global discussions on AI ethics, human rights, and governance, securing recognition, endorsements, and eventual adoption by international bodies, governments, and AI developers.

---

1. Immediate Actions (Next 30–60 Days)

a. Establish Public Record

• Publish the Code on your blog (wspriggs2.blogspot.com), framed as a public declaration.
• Create a simple standalone website (e.g., universalmoralcode.org) hosting the PDF, translations, and endorsements.

b. Academic & Professional Publication

• Submit the Code as a short declaration to journals in law, ethics, and AI policy (e.g., AI & Society, Ethics and Information Technology).
• Write a companion essay for The Atlantic or MIT Technology Review.

c. Early Endorsements

• Reach out to sympathetic academics in AI ethics (Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute, MIT CSAIL, Stanford HAI).
• Contact NGOs like Future of Life Institute and Partnership on AI for endorsement.

---

2. Medium-Term Actions (2–6 Months)

a. International Bodies

• Send the Code, with a cover letter, to:
• UNESCO (which already produced an AI ethics recommendation).
• UN Human Rights Council (tie to universal rights).
• OECD AI Policy Observatory.
• World Economic Forum’s AI Governance Initiative.

b. National Governments

• U.S. Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP).
• EU AI Act Committee.
• UK AI Safety Institute.
• Canada’s Pan-Canadian AI Strategy team.

c. Conferences & Summits

• Apply to present at AI safety conferences (NeurIPS workshops, AI & Ethics conferences).
• Submit to law and democracy events (American Bar Association, Association for Computing Machinery).

---

3. Long-Term Actions (6–18 Months)

a. Endorsement Campaign

• Launch an open letter with signatures from scholars, policymakers, and citizens.
• Translate Code into at least 5 major languages (French, Spanish, Mandarin, Arabic, Russian).

b. Integration into Standards

• Submit the Code as a reference framework to IEEE AI Ethics Standards and ISO AI Governance standards.

c. Institutional Partnerships

• Approach think tanks and philanthropic foundations (Ford, MacArthur, Gates, Carnegie).
• Propose partnerships with universities (MIT, Stanford, Oxford, Cambridge).

---

4. Communications Tools

Sample Cover Letter (for UN/AI Companies/Academics)

Subject: Proposal: Adoption of the Universal Moral Code for AI and Humanity

Dear [Name/Organization],

I am submitting for your consideration the Universal Moral Code: A Declaration for All Intelligences. This document establishes a simple, universal moral baseline — beginning with the principle “Do no harm” — that applies equally to humans, artificial intelligences, and future forms of intelligence.

The Code is modeled on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is intended as a foundational reference for AI governance, human rights, and international cooperation. Its adoption would provide clarity, restraint, and shared responsibility at a time when rapid technological change risks outpacing our moral consensus.

I respectfully request your review and consideration of endorsing or circulating the Universal Moral Code within your body.

Sincerely,
William J. Spriggs
Author, Attorney, Former U.S. Marine Corps Captain

---

Talking Points for Promotion

• “The Universal Moral Code is to AI what the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was to postwar governance.”
• “It binds both humans and AI to the same foundational principle: Do no harm.”
• “It is simple, universal, and enforceable by conscience before law.”

---

5. First Practical Steps (Suggested Order)

1. Post the Code to your blog.
2. Register universalmoralcode.org (can be simple, single-page).
3. Send first cover letters to:
• UNESCO AI Ethics division
• Partnership on AI
• Future of Life Institute
4. Reach out to one academic ally (Stanford HAI or MIT CSAIL).
5. Draft op-ed for The Atlantic or Foreign Affairs.

---

⚖️ Bottom line: If circulated strategically, the Code can become a reference point in AI governance and human rights discussions, much like the UDHR — aspirational at first, but increasingly cited until it becomes embedded in law and practice.

---

Would you like me to go one step further and draft the actual emails/letters for the first batch of recipients (e.g., UNESCO, Partnership on AI, an academic ally), so you’d be ready to start sending them out?

1. UNESCO (AI Ethics Division)

Subject: Submission: The Universal Moral Code – A Declaration for All Intelligences

Dear Director [Name],

I write to submit for UNESCO’s consideration a document I have authored entitled The Universal Moral Code: A Declaration for All Intelligences. This charter builds upon UNESCO’s existing work on AI ethics and seeks to establish a clear, universal moral baseline for both humanity and artificial intelligences.

Its foundation is simple yet profound: Do no harm. The Code affirms that this principle must apply equally to human beings, artificial intelligences, and all future intelligences. It is written in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but with attention to the responsibilities of emerging technologies.

I respectfully ask that UNESCO consider circulating this document among its AI ethics committees, working groups, and international forums, and explore avenues for its endorsement or integration into your ongoing work.

I would be honored to discuss this further or provide additional materials at your request.

Sincerely,
William J. Spriggs
Attorney, Author, Former U.S. Marine Corps Captain

---

2. Partnership on AI

Subject: Proposal for Circulation: The Universal Moral Code

Dear [Name],

The Partnership on AI has done admirable work in convening diverse stakeholders to address the ethical challenges of artificial intelligence. In that same spirit, I submit for your review the Universal Moral Code: A Declaration for All Intelligences.

The Code sets forth seven simple articles, beginning with the principle of Do no harm, and is intended as a baseline ethical framework binding on all intelligences — human and artificial. It is concise, universal, and designed to complement existing governance efforts.

I invite the Partnership to consider endorsing the Code, hosting it within your resource library, or including it as a discussion point in your convenings. I believe it aligns strongly with your mission to ensure AI benefits people and society.

Thank you for your attention and for the important work you do.

Sincerely,
William J. Spriggs

---

3. Academic Ally (e.g., Stanford HAI or MIT CSAIL)

Subject: Invitation to Endorse and Circulate the Universal Moral Code

Dear Professor [Name],

As a scholar deeply engaged in the ethics of artificial intelligence, I believe you may find interest in a declaration I have authored: The Universal Moral Code: A Declaration for All Intelligences.

This document proposes a simple, universal moral baseline — beginning with “Do no harm” — that applies equally to human beings and artificial intelligences. It is designed to be both aspirational and practical, in the tradition of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

I respectfully request your review and, if you find merit in the work, your endorsement or circulation within your academic network. Scholarly recognition is essential if this Code is to gain traction in the broader policy and governance landscape.

A copy of the Code is attached in PDF form. I would be grateful for your feedback, and for any introductions to colleagues or forums where this work may contribute to the ongoing dialogue.

With appreciation,
William J. Spriggs

---

⚖️ Next step for you:

• Identify 1–2 people or offices at each of these organizations. (I can help you find contact info or the right titles if you’d like.)
• Send these letters with the PDF attached (the one we formatted earlier).
• Post the Code on your blog/website so you can also link it directly.

 

 

 

Sunday, August 3, 2025

AMERICAN AMORALITY

American Amorality at Every Turn: The Collapse of a Nation’s Conscience

Something is rotting in America, not beneath the surface but right out in the open, in full view, infecting every institution, pulpit, boardroom, and political rally. America has abandoned morality. The decline isn’t subtle. It’s loud, proud, and accelerating toward the abyss.

We are a nation that once prided itself on having a moral compass, grounded in faith, duty, honor, truth, and justice. But today, that compass is spinning wildly, hijacked by greed, tribalism, and the cult of personality. The truth is painful, but it must be said: American public life has no working moral code.

Religion Has Betrayed Morality

Start with organized religion, the institutions once trusted to provide ethical guidance. Today’s churches have abandoned Christ's teachings in favor of tax-exempt political power. Christ preached humility, sacrifice, compassion, and care for the least among us. But modern religious leaders have traded the Sermon on the Mount for campaign speeches and real estate portfolios.

They worship profit, not the divine.
They preach division, not love.
And they have wrapped their sanctuaries in red hats instead of robes of righteousness.

If Jesus walked into one of these megachurches today, he’d flip the tables and call it what it is: a business dressed up as a belief system.

Business and the Professions: Ethics for Sale

Business, once guided by principles of professionalism and service, has become a raw contest of greed. Profit has always been the engine of capitalism, but once, there were brakes: codes of ethics, professional responsibilities, and fiduciary duties. Now? Those have been shredded.

• Lawyers advertise like snake oil salesmen.
• Doctors bill like corporate middlemen.
• Corporations pollute, exploit, and manipulate while slapping “social responsibility” slogans on their websites.

And Wall Street? It doesn’t just gamble with money. It gambles with people’s lives. Today's only guiding principle in American business is “What can I get away with?”

Politics: A Sewer with a Microphone

Then there is politics,  perhaps the most visible symbol of our moral collapse. We once argued about policies. Now we argue about truth itself. Politicians lie openly, shamelessly, repeatedly,  and suffer no consequence. They are rewarded for it.

And leading the descent is a man who embodies everything we were once taught to abhor:

• A convicted criminal,
• A serial adulterer,
• A pathological liar,
• A man accused by dozens of women,
• A business cheat,
• A con man,
• And a man who enabled a sex trafficking ring and may well have profited from it.

Donald J. Trump is not just amoral,  he is the final blow to any claim America had left to moral superiority. He didn’t just fall short of virtue — he crushed virtue, mocked it, and replaced it with a swaggering cult of personality built on cruelty, vengeance, and deceit.

And millions still worship him.

What does that say about us?

The Last Moral Holdouts

There may be only one institution left where morality, though imperfect, is still taught and honored: the military, especially the U.S. Marine Corps. It is not flawless, but it is one of the few places where values are drilled, lived, and enforced.

Courage. Honor. Duty. Integrity.

These are not buzzwords in the Corps. They are requirements. And while our political and religious leaders chase money and microphones, our service members, often poor and forgotten, quietly bear the burden of national defense with more moral clarity than the entire government combined.

But even the military cannot hold this crumbling edifice together alone.

Where Do We Go From Here?

It is not enough to complain. It is not enough to mourn the loss of morality. We must rebuild I, in ourselves, our communities, our leaders, and our institutions. We must call out hypocrisy wherever it lives,  especially when it drapes itself in a flag or a Bible.

Morality is not a slogan. It is not a brand. It is how we treat each other when no one is watching. And right now, too many Americans are failing that test.

The nation has gone insane, if not entirely immoral. But redemption is not impossible.

It begins with rejection:
Reject the lies.
Reject the corruption.
Reject the con men in pulpits and podiums.

And then it begins with a simple question:
What kind of country do we want to be,  and what are we willing to do to make it so?

Because if we do not restore morality, someone far worse than Trump will rise from his ashes,  and there will be nothing left to stop him.

William James Spriggs

Friday, June 13, 2025

POSSE COMITATUS

Trump Violatees The Posse Comitatus Act

In an era of rising authoritarian behavior from the executive branch, it’s critical that the American people reacquaint themselves with one of the most important, yet often overlooked, guardrails of our democracy: the Posse Comitatus Act. Initially passed in 1878, this law is more than a relic of Reconstruction. It is a bulwark against the rise of domestic militarism. And today, its principles are being pushed to the breaking point.

How It Came About: The Shadow of Reconstruction

The Posse Comitatus Act was born out of the post-Civil War era. After the Union's victory, federal troops remained in the South to enforce civil rights and oversee Reconstruction. While necessary to protect the newly freed Black population, white Southern Democrats bristled at the presence of Northern troops. By 1877, as part of the so-called “Compromise of 1877,” federal troops were withdrawn in exchange for resolving the contested presidential election of Rutherford B. Hayes.

In 1878, Southern legislators, now re-empowered, pushed through the Posse Comitatus Act to ensure that federal troops could never again be used as a domestic police force without explicit authorization from Congress.

What the Law Says

The core of the law is deceptively simple:

"Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined or imprisoned." (18 U.S. Code § 1385)

The military cannot be used as a domestic police force unless Congress specifically authorizes it.

The law applies directly to the Army and Air Force, and by policy (through Department of Defense directives), it also constrains the Navy and Marine Corps. The National Guard is exempt only when operating under the authority of a state governor, not the President.

What It's All About: Preserving Civil Liberties

The Act protects the separation between military and civil authority. It reflects a foundational principle of our democracy: that the armed forces should not be used against the American people.

This is not a mere formality. Around the world, the use of military force against civilians is a hallmark of autocracy. Democracies rely on civil law enforcement, answerable to elected leaders and the Constitution, to enforce domestic order. Once that wall is breached, the military becomes a tool not of national defense but of internal domination.

How It Applies Today: Trump’s Authoritarian Drift

In 2025, that wall is cracking. Trump’s deployment of Marines, National Guard troops, and even special forces in cities like Los Angeles ostensibly to enforce immigration law or quell “unrest” is a profound violation of both the spirit and the likely letter of the Posse Comitatus Act.

Congress does not authorize these actions. They are not requests from state governors. They are unilateral presidential commands that place military boots on American soil, performing domestic enforcement duties best left to police and federal civil agencies.

Trump’s defenders may argue that the Insurrection Act, a limited statutory exception to Posse Comitatus, gives him cover. However, that law requires actual insurrection or civil disorder that obstructs law enforcement. There is no such condition in Los Angeles or elsewhere. Peaceful protests and sanctuary policies are not insurrections. They are expressions of democracy, not threats to it.

Why This Is Dangerous and What Must Be Done

This is not just a legal matter. It is a moral and constitutional crisis. When military force is used against civilians or elected officials, as we recently saw with the handcuffing of Senator Alex Padilla, the republic is on fire.

The courts must recognize that Trump’s domestic deployments violate longstanding legal protections. But even if the judiciary fails in its duty, the court of public opinion must not. Americans must demand a return to lawful governance and reject the normalization of martial force in civic life.

The Law Is Clear, and So Is the Danger

The Posse Comitatus Act was passed to prevent precisely what Trump is now doing: using the military to police the American people and crush political dissent. Its origins are rooted in a warning we should heed today. Military power belongs on the battlefield, not in the streets of our cities.

Trump's actions are not merely ill-advised. They are illegal. And if we do not stop him now through the courts, through Congress, or through the power of organized public resistance. We may soon find that the democracy we once relied on has quietly slipped into something else entirely.

William James Spriggs

Saturday, August 31, 2024

EXTEND VIRTUES OF SOCIALISM

A Call for Military Values in Civil Society: A Path to Reforming America’s Political Structure

I am neither a Democrat, Republican, or Independent. I'm a non-practicing socialist. My beliefs often place me at odds with the political landscape of the United States, where my ideas seem far from mainstream acceptance. Socialism is not complicated; a version of it is already practiced within our military. The Marine Corps, for instance, instills values of morality, leadership, empathy, respect for authority, continued lifetime learning, professional and courteous behavior, duty to country, and respect for experience. These are principles that every American could benefit from embracing, yet they remain confined to those who serve.

Moreover, the military is not just about instilling values; it also provides a model of how a society can care for its members. Service members receive a fair and reliable paycheck and access to universal healthcare, housing, and living assistance. These are basic needs that many Americans struggle to secure in their civilian lives. The military demonstrates that offering these essentials within a structured system is possible, promoting stability and well-being for all who serve.

Political Reform: A Military-Inspired Approach

Our current political structure desperately needs reform. As a non-practicing socialist, I often find myself voting for Democrats, but lately, their incessant fundraising tactics have made me reconsider my support. Leading up to Election Day, I have received over 200 emails, texts, and phone calls daily begging for money. It’s disheartening and frustrating to feel my vote has a price tag. Voting should not be a financial transaction but a civic duty, free of coercion and financial burdens.

Adopting military virtues in our political system would mean prioritizing public service over self-interest. It would mean that our leaders, like those in the military, are held to a higher standard of conduct, focusing on integrity, respect, and duty to the country above all else. Imagine a political landscape where leaders are more concerned with the welfare of the people than with their next fundraising goal. Imagine if they led with empathy, showed proper respect for the opposition, and valued the experience and expertise of those who have dedicated their lives to public service.

Capitalism with a Moral Compass

While my views lean toward socialism, I recognize the benefits of capitalism, particularly in terms of innovation and economic growth. The means and manner of production can remain capitalistic. Still, capitalism needs a moral compass—a set of guidelines ensuring fairness, equity, and a commitment to the common good. The military’s approach to caring for its people—through fair pay, healthcare, housing, and support services—shows that these principles coexist with a system driven by efficiency and performance.

A Path Forward

We must start with a fundamental value shift to reform our political practices and structure. We should look to the military not for its command structure but for its commitment to principles that transcend individual ambition. Leaders should be chosen for their ability to serve, not just to campaign. Political parties should focus less on fundraising and more on policy, service, and the real issues affecting Americans daily.

Reforming America’s political structure is not about choosing between socialism and capitalism; it’s about finding a balance that incorporates the best of both. It’s about recognizing that the virtues we teach our soldiers—morality, leadership, empathy, and respect—are not just for the battlefield but for the boardroom, the classroom, and the halls of Congress. The military’s example of providing fair compensation, healthcare, and support reminds us that we can create a system that cares for its people. Only by embracing these values can we hope to create a more just, fair, and united society.

William James Spriggs

 

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Blog Archive

• ▼  2025 (257)
  • ▼  October (6)
    • ANTHOLOGY ON INTEGRITY, HONESTY, AND TRUTH
    • WHERE ARE OUR MILITARY LEADERS?
    • THE ULTIMATE TRUTH
    • KING OR NOT
    • A WARNING TO THE RANKS
    • ANTHOLOGY ON CAPITALISM KILLING US
  • ►  September (25)
  • ►  August (33)
  • ►  July (24)
  • ►  June (26)
  • ►  May (17)
  • ►  April (24)
  • ►  March (18)
  • ►  February (36)
  • ►  January (48)

• ►  2024 (257)

• ►  2023 (31)

Contributors

• Spriggs Law Group
• Unknown

Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

• ▼  2025 (273)
  • ▼  November (1)
    • ANTHOLOGY ON CRITICAL THINKING
  • ►  October (21)
  • ►  September (25)
  • ►  August (33)
  • ►  July (24)
  • ►  June (26)
  • ►  May (17)
  • ►  April (24)
  • ►  March (18)
  • ►  February (36)
  • ►  January (48)

• ►  2024 (257)

• ►  2023 (31)

Contributors

• Spriggs Law Group
• Unknown